| Literature DB >> 29708476 |
Verônica da Silva Cardoso1, Alane Beatriz Vermelho1, Eduardo Ricci Junior2, Igor Almeida Rodrigues3, Ana Maria Mazotto1, Claudiu T Supuran4.
Abstract
The β-carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) from Leishmania spp. (LdcCA) is effectively inhibited by aromatic/heterocyclic sulphonamides, in the low nanomolar range, but no in vitro antileishmanial activity was detected for such compounds. We formulated some of these sulphonamides as nanoemulsions (NEs) in clove oil, and tested them in vitro against Leishmania infantum MHOM/BR/1974/PP75 and Leishmania amazonensis IFLA/BR/1967/PH8 strains. Interesting inhibitory concentrations IC50 were observed for some of the sulphonamides NEs, with IC50 as low as 3.90 µM (NE-3F) and 2.24 µM (NE-5B) for L. amazonensis and 3.47 µM (NE-5B) for L. infantum. Some of the investigated NEs displayed toxicity for macrophages beyond the parasites. For the same nonoemulsions, a selective index (SI) greater than for Amphotericin B. Haemolytic assay using human red blood cells indicate that the NEs were less cytotoxic than amphotericin B, a widely used antifungal agent. NEs demonstrated to be an excellent strategy for increasing the penetration of these hydrophilic drugs through membranes, with a huge increase of efficacy over the sulphonamide CA inhibitor (CAI) alone.Entities:
Keywords: Leishmania; Sulphonamide; nanoemulsions; β-carbonic anhydrase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29708476 PMCID: PMC6010131 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2018.1463221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.Sulphonamides 3F, 3G, 3W, 5B, 5C and 5D used in the study and their LdcCA inhibitory action (KIs, nM).
Figure 2.Haemolysis caused by different agents: amphotericin B (AMP) and nanoemulsions containing inhibitors. (A) NE-3F, NE-3G, NE-3W, AMP, and NEs; B. NE-5B, NE-5C, NE-5D, AMP, and NEs. (B) Haemolysis was determined by an absorbance reading at 540 nm and compared to haemolysis achieved with 1% Triton X-100 (reference for 100% haemolysis). Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
NEs size and polydispersity index.
| Formulation/drug | Drug (mg) | Oil clove (ml) | AP (ml) | Size (nm) | PDI | Stability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | 1 | 9 | 31.54 ± 0.413 | 0.105 ± 0.012 | Stable | |
| 5 | 1 | 9 | 60.12 ± 2.36 | 0.274 ± 0.033 | Stable | |
| 5 | 1 | 9 | 100.63 ± 2.05 | 0.262 ± 0.008 | Stable | |
| 5 | 1 | 9 | 97.34 ± 2.82 | 0.264 ± 0.15 | Stable | |
| 5 | 1 | 9 | 44.83 ± 0.753 | 0.123 ± 0.078 | Stable | |
| 5 | 1 | 9 | 53.99 ± 1.12 | 0.233 ± 0.003 | Stable | |
| 5 | 1 | 9 | 35.09 ± 0.575 | 0.165 ± 0.019 | Stable |
Drug concentration 500 µg/mL.
Mean ± SD of n = 3 determinations.
AP: aqueous phase containing detergent (Pluronic F127) and water.
Viability assay of L. amazonensis promastigotes, cytotoxicity test using RAW 267.4 macrophage cells, and determining the selectivity index of nanoemulsions.
| Nanoemulsions | AMP6 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | 128 | >128 | 128 | 32 | >28 | >28 | 4 |
| IC50 | 3.90 ± 1.96a | 12.01 ± 0.58b | 10.55 ± 4.51b | 2.24 ± 0.178c | 12.41 ± 0.45b | 18.26 ± 5.28d | 0.61 ± 0.01e |
| IC90 | 105.58 ± 30.63a | n.d. | 92.74 ± 38.23b | 22.46 ± 6.80c | n.d. | n.d. | 1.23 ± 0.23d |
| CC504 µM | 8.13 ± 1.1a | 6.77 ± 1.7b | 3.21 ± 0.55c | 6.51 ± 1.11b | 8.04 ± 1.33a | 6.75 ± 0.98b | 1.07 ± 1.49d |
| IS505 | 2.06 ± 0.17a | 0.48 ± 0.21c | 0.34 ± 0.12d | 2.12 ± 0.11a | 0.64 ± 0.22c | 0.37 ± 0.09d | 1.78 ± 0.01b |
The means compared by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
n.d.: not determined.
1MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
2IC50: concentration which reduced 50% of the proliferation of L. amazonensis promastigote stage.
3IC90: concentration which reduced 90% of the proliferation of L. amazonensis promastigote stages.
4CC50: concentration in μg·ml−1 cytotoxic for 50% of RAW 264.7 cells.
5SI: selectivity index = CC50/IC50.
6AMP: amphotericin B.
a,b,c,d,eIn the lines: averages with equal letters do not differ statistically (p>.05).
Viability assay of L. infantum promastigotes, cytotoxicity test using RAW 267.4 macrophage cells, and determining the selectivity index of NEs.
| Nanoemulsions | AMP6 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | >128 | >128 | >128 | 64 | >128 | >128 | 4 |
| IC50 | 12.00 ± 4.3a | 10.72 ± 2.68a | 12.46 ± 1.35a | 3.47 ± 0.35c | 14.58 ± 0.88a | 51.70 ± 5.18b | 0.67 ± 0.10d |
| IC90 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 52.03 ± 8.01a | n.d. | n.d. | 1.01 ± 0.03b |
| CC504 µM | 8.13 ± 1.19a | 6.77 ± 1.07b | 3.21 ± 0.55c | 6.51 ± 1.11b | 8.04 ± 1.33a | 6.75 ± 0.98b | 1.07 ± 1.49d |
| IS505 | 0.66 ± 0.17a | 0.77 ± 0.21a | 0.34 ± 0.12a | 2.01 ± 0.11b | 0.87 ± 0.22a | 0.11 ± 0.09c | 1.59 ± 0.01d |
The means compared by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
n.d.: not determined.
1MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration.
2IC50: concentration which reduced 50% of the proliferation of L. infantum promastigote stage.
3IC90: concentration which reduced 90% of the proliferation of L. infantum promastigote stages.
4CC50: Concentration in μg·ml−1 cytotoxic for 50% of RAW 264.7 cells.
5SI: selectivity index = CC50/IC50.
6AMP: Amphotericin B.
a,b,c,dIn the lines: averages with equal letters do not differ statistically (p>.05).
Haemolitic index of nanoemulsions 3F, 3G, 3W, 5B, 5C, and 5D.
| Haemolysis (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| µM | Nanoemulsion without drug | |||||||
| HC50 | 168.28 ± 14.15a | 138.96 ± 32.97a | >256 | >256 | 168.62 ± 18.45a | >256 | 27.93 ± 1.71b | >256 |
| 256 | 55.81 ± 14.50 | 68.51 ± 1.3 | 25.79 ± 2.0 | 43.04 ± 1.1 | 45.32 ± 16.13 | 55.7 ± 10.4 | 100.0 ± 0 | 15.75 ± 1.24 |
| 128 | 40.43 ± 16.73 | 49.9 ± 10.2 | 9.03 ± 0.06 | 40.0 ± 0.93 | 38.01 ± 1.48 | 40.22 ± 2.1 | 100.0 ± 0 | 13.37 ± 3.49 |
| 64 | 40.87 ± 9.36 | 49.86 ± 0.8 | 10.0 ± 0.01 | 24.37 ± 2.9 | 45.89 ± 9.25 | 17.35 ± 9.5 | 75.7 ± 5.24 | 6.71 ± 5.33 |
| 32 | 7.17 ± 0.30 | 10.0 ± 0.04 | 8.06 ± 0.04 | 21.17 ± 2.1 | 10.11 ± 0.18 | 12.15 ± 0.3 | 57.81 ± 6.7 | 4.75 ± 2.66 |
| 16 | 1.10 ± 0.17 | 9.25 ± 0.43 | 7.74 ± 0.43 | 2.11 ± 0.20 | 8.24 ± 0.42 | 4.29 ± 0.50 | 20.81 ± 0.5 | 1.68 ± 0.51 |
| 8 | 1.11 ± 0.24 | 7.32 ± 0.56 | 6.96 ± 0.56 | 1.22 ± 0.38 | 8.21 ± 0.36 | 6.27 ± 0.46 | 2.09 ± 0.15 | 1.81 ± 0.22 |
| 4 | 1.20 ± 0.34 | 6.04 ± 0.07 | 5.13 ± 0.20 | 1.04 ± 0.06 | 1.16 ± 0.28 | 2.02 ± 0.04 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 1.35 ± 0.37 |
| 2 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 5.72 ± 0.49 | 3.13 ± 0.07 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 1.02 ± 0.04 | 1.12 ± 0.20 | 1.18 ± 0.31 | 1.74 ± 0.76 |
The means compared by the Student–Newman–Keuls test.
a,bIn the lines: averages with equal letters do not differ statistically (p > .05).