Literature DB >> 28765795

Inpatient versus Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Perioperative Complication Analysis of 259,414 Patients From the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Databases.

Shearwood McClelland1, Peter G Passias1, Thomas J Errico1, R Shay Bess1, Themistocles S Protopsaltis1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common operations utilized to address pathology of the cervical spine. Few reports have attempted to compare complications associated with inpatient versus outpatient ACDF.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2001-2012 and the State Ambulatory Services Database (SASD) for New Jersey (NJ) from 2003-2012 were used for analysis. Patients receiving ACDF (defined as anterior cervical fusion (ICD-0 code=81.02) + excision of intervertebral disc (80.51)) were segmented into an inpatient group derived from the NIS, and an outpatient group derived from the NJ SASD. Patients receiving > 2 levels fused (ICD-9 codes 81.63-81.64), or surgery for cancer (ICD-9 codes 140-239), or trauma (ICD-9 codes=805.0-806.9) were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the analysis for patient age, race, sex, primary payer for care, and number of medical diagnoses.
RESULTS: Of the 94,492,438 inpatients comprising the NIS from 2001-2012, 257,398 received ACDF. Of the 4,194,207 outpatients comprising the NJ SASD, 2,016 received ACDF. PSM of 10,080 patients (all 2,016 SASD and 8,064 from NIS) was performed, and subsequent analysis revealed that durotomy (P=0.001;OR=0.81), paraplegia, postoperative infection, hematoma/seroma (OR=0.14), respiratory complications, acute posthemorrhagic anemia and red blood cell transfusion (all P<0.001) were less frequent in outpatient versus inpatient ACDF (p<0.05). These results were similar to an unmatched analysis involving all of the NIS patients.
CONCLUSION: Accepting the limitations of the NIS and SASD (inability to distinguish between one and two-level fusions, no long-term follow-up, potential selection bias, disparities between inpatient and outpatient ACDF populations), these findings indicate that for 1-2 level ACDF, perioperative complications, including durotomy, paraplegia, hematoma, and acute posthemorrhagic anemia were more commonly reported following inpatient ACDF. Future studies involving outpatient analysis of several states will be necessary to determine whether these results of outpatient ACDF are applicable nationwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; inpatient; nationwide inpatient sample; outpatient; perioperative outcomes; state ambulatory and services database

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765795      PMCID: PMC5537979          DOI: 10.14444/4011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  12 in total

1.  The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks.

Authors:  R B CLOWARD
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion.

Authors:  G W SMITH; R A ROBINSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1958-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Inpatient safety trends in laparoscopic and open nephrectomy for renal tumours.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Kerrin L Palazzi; David C Chang; Nicholas T Ward; J Kellogg Parsons
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Saniya S Godil; Anthony L Asher; Scott L Parker; Clinton J Devin
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Evan Pushchak; Sigita Burneikiene; Jeffrey J Thramann
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Anticipating the effects of Medicaid expansion on surgical care.

Authors:  Seth A Waits; Bradley N Reames; Kyle H Sheetz; Michael J Englesbe; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005.

Authors:  Marjorie C Wang; William Kreuter; Christopher E Wolfla; Dennis J Maiman; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Tim Adamson; Saniya S Godil; Melissa Mehrlich; Stephen Mendenhall; Anthony L Asher; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-02-05

9.  Safety and feasibility of outpatient ACDF in an ambulatory setting: A retrospective chart review.

Authors:  William C Tally; Sanjiwan Tarabadkar; Boris V Kovalenko
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2013-12-01

10.  Comparison of inpatient vs. outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Liu; Rudy P Briner; Jonathan A Friedman
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Steven J McAnany
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

2.  Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.

Authors:  Jason M Cuellar; Edward Nomoto; Ehsan Saadat; Anthony Ma; Patrick Hill; Michael Kropf; Todd H Lanman; Brian Perri; Khawar Siddique; Willis Wagner; Rajeev Rao; Albert Wong; Michael Eng; Stephen Stephan; Neel Anand; Hyun Bae; Alexandre Rasouli
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

3.  Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Bertrand Debono; Pascal Sabatier; Guillaume Boniface; Philippe Bousquet; Jean-Paul Lescure; Valérie Garnaud; Olivier Hamel; Guillaume Lonjon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF.

Authors:  Brian L Dial; Valentine R Esposito; Richard Danilkowicz; Jeffrey O'Donnell; Barrie Sugarman; Daniel J Blizzard; Melissa E Erickson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Comparison of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed in an Inpatient Versus Outpatient Setting.

Authors:  Avani Vaishnav; Patrick Hill; Steven McAnany; Dil V Patel; Brittany E Haws; Benjamin Khechen; Kern Singh; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-03-12

6.  Ambulatory Surgical Centers: Improving Quality of Operative Spine Care?

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings; Vincent C Traynelis
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-01-06

7.  Comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis of 20,035 procedures.

Authors:  Michael P Kucharik; Nathan H Varady; Matthew J Best; Samuel S Rudisill; Sara A Naessig; Christopher T Eberlin; Scott D Martin
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-11-15

Review 8.  Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion combined with thyroid gland surgery, a tailored case and literature review.

Authors:  Konstantinos M Themistoklis; Stefanos I Korfias; Themistoklis I Papasilekas; Konstantinos A Boviatsis; Agis G Kokkoros; Eleftherios D Spartalis; Georgios P Mimidis; Damianos E Sakas
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.