Literature DB >> 17321962

The safety of instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Alan T Villavicencio1, Evan Pushchak, Sigita Burneikiene, Jeffrey J Thramann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Reported hospitalization times after an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedure range between 20 hours to 4 days. Reasons for this wide variation are manifold, but the safety of an instrumented ACDF in the setting of a hostile medical-legal climate is most likely the primary concern influencing such a discrepancy.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of performing single, two- and three-level ACDF with instrumentation on an outpatient or 23-hour observation period basis in order to potentially diminish the additional cost of hardware without compromising the purported benefits of surgery. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing instrumented ACDF on an outpatient basis was performed. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 103 patients with neck pain and/or radiculopathy undergoing ACDF were enrolled into this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Included the evaluation of intraoperative and perioperative complications, which were reported for a total of 6 months after surgery. Clinical examination and radiographical assessment, including plain radiographs and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (when required), were performed to assess complications.
METHODS: Complications were divided into two groups: major and minor. Major complications included vertebral fracture and dehydration resulting in readmission. Minor complications included allergic reactions to medications that did not require hospitalization, and transient (< or = 3 months) neurologic deficit. A comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis was performed to generate a large comparison group in order to compare the complication rates in our outpatient series to those reported in the literature.
RESULTS: A total of 99 patients (96.1%) undergoing single and two-level ACDF were discharged less than 15 hours after their surgeries (median time: 8 hours; range: 2-15 hours), and 4 patients (3.9%) were discharged after a 23-hour observation period following three-level ACDF. The overall complication rate in our outpatient series was 3.8% (n=4), including 1.9% (n=2) major and 1.9% (n=2) minor complications. The overall complication rate in the 633 patient meta-analysis derived comparison group was 0.95% (n=6). The difference between overall complication rates was not found to be significantly different (p = .12). The hardware-related complication rate in the meta-analysis comparison group was 0.5% (n=3), and was not found to be significantly different from our rate of 0% (p < or = 1).
CONCLUSION: Performing ACDF with instrumentation on an outpatient basis is feasible, and it is not associated with higher overall or hardware-related complication rates as compared with complication rates reported in the literature, suggesting that this procedure is safe to perform on an outpatient basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17321962     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  31 in total

1.  Modified posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for lateral cervical disc herniation: the vertical anchoring technique.

Authors:  Conggang Liao; Qiang Ren; Lei Chu; Lei Shi; Qingshuai Yu; Zhenjian Yan; Kexiao Yu; Chao Liu; Wenkai Wu; Yang Xiong; Zhongliang Deng; Liang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Decompression for cervical disc herniation using the full-endoscopic anterior technique - German version].

Authors:  S Oezdemir; M Komp; P Hahn; S Ruetten
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 3.  Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Edward M DelSole; Heeren S Makanji; Mark F Kurd
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Myung Soo Youn; Myeong Hwan Shon; Yoon Jae Seong; Jong Ki Shin; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; R Shay Bess; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-10

6.  Instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: is it safe?

Authors:  Courtney S Sheperd; William F Young
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

7.  Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.

Authors:  Armin Arshi; Christopher Wang; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Inpatient versus Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Perioperative Complication Analysis of 259,414 Patients From the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Databases.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; R Shay Bess; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04-03

9.  Trends and Costs of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Comparison of Inpatient And Outpatient Procedures.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Anthony D'Oro; Zorica Buser; Jim A Youssef; Jong-Beom Park; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Darrel S Brodke; Jeffrey C Wang; S Tim Yoon
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2018

10.  Single level cervical disc herniation: A questionnaire based study on current surgical practices.

Authors:  Saeid Abrishamkar; Yousef Karimi; Mohammadreza Safavi; Pouria Tavakoli
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.