Literature DB >> 34551930

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Multisite, Comparative Analysis of Patient Safety Measures.

Jason M Cuellar1,2, Edward Nomoto1,2,3, Ehsan Saadat1,2, Anthony Ma1, Patrick Hill1,2,3, Michael Kropf1,2, Todd H Lanman1,4, Brian Perri1,2,3, Khawar Siddique1,4,3, Willis Wagner5, Rajeev Rao5, Albert Wong1,4,3, Michael Eng2, Stephen Stephan2, Neel Anand1,2,3, Hyun Bae1,2, Alexandre Rasouli1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency and complexity of spinal surgery performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) is increasing. However, safety and efficacy data of most spinal procedures adapted to the ASC are sparse and have focused on anterior cervical surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day complication and readmission rates of anterior lumbar spine surgery performed in an ASC or inpatient setting.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective comparative analysis of 226 consecutive anterior lumbar surgeries (283 levels treated) completed in an ASC (n = 124) or in an inpatient tertiary care hospital (n = 102) over a 3-year period. These included anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), artificial disc replacement (ADR), and hybrids. Patients undergoing simultaneous or staged posterior procedures within 3 months were excluded. Patient demographics and surgical parameters between the two surgical settings were compared. Ninety-day medical complications and readmission rates were assessed. One-way analysis of variance and Chi-square analysis were used. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The two study groups had similar baseline characteristics. While there was a trend toward fewer complications, reoperations, and readmissions for the ASC cohort, the differences were not statistically significant. There were 7 intraoperative complications (5.6% minor vascular injury) in the inpatient cohort and 0 in the ASC cohort. The overall 90-day postoperative complication rate was 5.6% for the inpatient cohort and 0.9% for the ASC cohort. The 90-day readmission rate was 1.9% in the ASC cohort and 1.6% in the inpatient cohort. The 90-day reoperation rate was 0.8% for the inpatient cohort and 0% in the ASC cohort. The average hospital stay was 2.3 ± 1.5 days for the inpatient cohort.
CONCLUSION: The 90-day readmission rates were lower for outpatients than for inpatients, while the complication and reoperation rates were similar. Our results demonstrate that anterior lumbar procedures, including single-level and multilevel ALIF, ADR, and hybrid procedures, can be performed safely in an ASC. This has significant cost savings implications for the ASC setting. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2021 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADR; ALIF; ASC; ambulatory surgery center; anterior lumbar interbody fusion; hybrid; inpatient; lumbar disc replacement; lumbar spine surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34551930      PMCID: PMC8651185          DOI: 10.14444/8123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  38 in total

1.  Success and safety in outpatient microlumbar discectomy.

Authors:  Natalie M Best; Rick C Sasso
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-07

2.  Outpatient laminotomy and discectomy.

Authors:  H S An; J M Simpson; R Stein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-06

Review 3.  Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration.

Authors:  Wilco Jacobs; Niels A Van der Gaag; Alexander Tuschel; Marinus de Kleuver; Wilco Peul; A J Verbout; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

4.  Outpatient and Inpatient Readmission Rates of 1- and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgeries.

Authors:  Syed I Khalid; Adam Carlton; Rita Wu; Ryan Kelly; Akhil Peta; Owoicho Adogwa
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Five-year results of lumbar disc prostheses in the SWISSspine registry.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Christian Etter; Christian Bärlocher; Friedrich Sgier; Philippe Otten; Paul Heini; Oliver Hausmann; Gianluca Maestretti; Martin Baur; François Porchet; Thomas M Markwalder; Stefan Schären; Michal Neukamp; Christoph Röder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Outpatient and Inpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Comparison of 30-day Outcomes.

Authors:  Dale N Segal; Jacob M Wilson; Christopher Staley; S Tim Yoon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Jack E Zigler; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-10-19

8.  Early outcomes and safety of outpatient (surgery center) vs inpatient based L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Ryan Snowden; Dylan Fischer; Paul Kraemer
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Inpatient versus Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Perioperative Complication Analysis of 259,414 Patients From the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Databases.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; R Shay Bess; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04-03

10.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Tim Adamson; Saniya S Godil; Melissa Mehrlich; Stephen Mendenhall; Anthony L Asher; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.