| Literature DB >> 28763489 |
Renee M Petri1, Poulad Pourazad1, Ratchaneewan Khiaosa-Ard1, Fenja Klevenhusen1, Barbara U Metzler-Zebeli2, Qendrim Zebeli1.
Abstract
Subacute rumen acidotic (SARA) conditions are a consequence of high grain feeding. Recent work has shown that the pattern of grain feeding can significantly impact the rumen epimural microbiota. In a continuation of these works, the objective of this study was to determine the role of grain feeding patterns on the colonization and associated changes in predicted functional properties of the fiber-adherent microbial community over a 48 h period. Eight rumen-cannulated Holstein cows were randomly assigned to interrupted or continuous 60%-grain challenge model (n = 4 per model) to induce SARA conditions. Cows in the continuous model were challenged for 4 weeks, whereas cows of interrupted model had a 1-wk break in between challenges. To determine dynamics of rumen fiber-adherent microbial community we incubated the same hay from the diet samples for 24 and 48 h in situ during the baseline (no grain fed), week 1 and 4 of the continuous grain feeding model as well as during the week 1 following the break in the interrupted model. Microbial DNA was extracted and 16SrRNA amplicon (V3-V5 region) sequencing was done with the Illumina MiSeq platform. A significant decrease (P < 0.001) in fiber-adherent rumen bacterial species richness and diversity was observed at the end of a 4 week continuous SARA challenge in comparison to the baseline. A total of 159 operational taxonominc units (OTUs) were identified from the microbial population representing > 0.1% relative abundance in the rumen, 18 of which were significantly impacted by the feeding challenge model. Correlation analysis of the significant OTUs to rumen pH as an indicator of SARA showed genus Succiniclasticum had a positive correlation to SARA conditions regardless of treatment. Predictive analysis of functional microbial properties suggested that the glyoxylate/dicarboxylate pathway was increased in response to SARA conditions, decreased between 24h to 48h of incubation, negatively correlated with propanoate metabolism and positively correlated to members of the Veillonellaceae family including Succiniclasticum spp. This may indicate an adaptive response in bacterial metabolism under SARA conditions. This research clearly indicates that changes to the colonizing fiber-adherent rumen microbial population and their predicted functional genes occur in both the short (48 h) and long term (4 wk) under both continuous and interrupted SARA challenge models.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28763489 PMCID: PMC5538656 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182271
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Dry matter intake (DMI) and pH taken on treatment sampling day.
| Parameter | Intermittent Feeding | Continous Feeding | SEM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base-I | INT | Base-C | CONT-1 | CONT-4 | |||
| DMI (kg per day) | 10.9 | 17.3 | 9.9 | 15.3 | 17.3 | 0.98 | < 0.001 |
| Mean pH | 6.53 | 5.96 | 6.48 | 6.2 | 6.24 | 0.075 | < 0.001 |
| Time spent pH < 5.8 (min) | 0 | 425 | 0 | 145 | 231 | 91.1 | 0.013 |
Values are least squares means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Values are a mean of data from 24 and 48 h sampling points under two subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) challenge models.
a,b For each variable, means in the same feeding model within the same row differ, superscripts are based on Tukey's HSD test.
2Base-C = forage only diet for continuous challenge model, Base-I = forage only diet for intermittent challenge model, INT = SARA inducing diet for intermittent challenge model, CONT-1 = SARA inducing diet sample after one week of continuous challenge model, CONT-4 = SARA inducing diet sample after 4 weeks of continuous challenge model.
Alpha diversity measures of rumen fiber-associated communities based on treatment and duration of incubation.
| Item | Intermittent Feeding | Continuous Feeding | SEM | Insitu Incubation (hours) | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base-I | INT | Base-C | CONT-1 | CONT-4 | 24h | 48h | Phase | Time | |||
| Observed OTUs | 2762 | 1856 | 2836 | 1850 | 1577 | 97 | 2174 | 2178 | 61.3 | < 0.001 | 0.97 |
| Chao | 3868 | 2903 | 4007 | 2815 | 2374 | 141.9 | 3207 | 3180 | 89.7 | < 0.001 | 0.84 |
| Simpson | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.007 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.4 |
| Shannon | 9.00 | 7.47 | 9.11 | 7.30 | 6.85 | 0.239 | 7.85 | 8.04 | 0.151 | < 0.001 | 0.4 |
Values are least squares means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
a,b For each variable, means in the same feeding model within the same row differ, superscripts are based on Tukey's HSD test.
1Base-C = forage only diet for continuous challenge model, Base-I = forage only diet for intermittent challenge model, INT = SARA inducing diet for intermittent challenge model, CONT-1 = SARA inducing diet sample after one week of continuous challenge model, CONT-4 = SARA inducing diet sample after 4 weeks of continuous challenge model.
2 OTU = operational taxonomic unit to 97% identity
3 Phase = sampling point for either model
Percent relative abundance and taxonomic classification of significant OTUs representing greater than 0.5% ruminal abundance.
| OTU | Feeding Phases | SEM | NCBI | Percent identity to NCBI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermittent Feeding | Continous Feeding | ||||||||
| Base-I | INT | Base-C | CONT-1 | CONT-4 | |||||
| OTU1 | 5.75 | 2.66 | 5.11 | 4.34 | 3.01 | 0.611 | 0.005 | 98 | |
| OTU3 | 0.12 | 1.66 | 0.13 | 3.52 | 7.36 | 1.745 | 0.03 | 86 | |
| OTU5 | 0.81 | 2.74 | 0.46 | 2.40 | 1.00 | 0.508 | 0.01 | 99 | |
| OTU6 | 0.79 | 2.48 | 0.46 | 1.64 | 1.89 | 0.389 | 0.01 | 100 | |
| OTU7 | 0.90 | 1.82 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 0.354 | 0.02 | 99 | |
| OTU10 | 1.84 | 1.06 | 1.97 | 1.85 | 0.82 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 88 | |
| OTU11 | 1.00 | 1.54 | 0.83 | 1.49 | 1.70 | 0.179 | 0.01 | 99 | |
| OTU12 | 1.83 | 0.72 | 1.92 | 1.65 | 0.52 | 0.169 | <0.0001 | 86 | |
| OTU21 | 0.42 | 1.11 | 0.26 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.188 | 0.01 | 95 | |
| OTU23 | 0.32 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 1.35 | 0.254 | 0.04 | 84 | |
| OTU24 | 0.65 | 1.03 | 0.59 | 0.92 | 0.45 | 0.119 | 0.01 | 93 | |
| OTU25 | 0.84 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.40 | 0.093 | 0.01 | 94 | |
| OTU27 | 1.04 | 0.55 | 0.89 | 0.6 | 0.53 | 0.102 | 0.003 | 94 | |
| OTU32 | 0.52 | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 1.04 | 0.148 | 0.05 | 93 | |
| OTU33 | 0.17 | 1.14 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 0.6 | 0.205 | 0.01 | 99 | |
| OTU34 | 0.96 | 0.32 | 1.08 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.12 | <0.0001 | 88 | |
| OTU35 | 1.10 | 0.19 | 1.02 | 0.47 | 0.17 | 0.126 | <0.0001 | 98 | |
| OTU38 | 0.99 | 0.09 | 1.03 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 0.14 | <0.0001 | 94 | |
| OTU40 | 1.17 | 0.28 | 0.76 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.161 | <0.0001 | 92 | |
| OTU46 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 0.84 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.102 | <0.0001 | 84 | |
| OTU47 | 0.73 | 0.05 | 0.77 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.097 | <0.0001 | 94 | |
| OTU49 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.12 | 0.5 | 0.125 | 0.01 | 99 | |
Values are least squares means ± standard error of the mean (SEM)
1All OTUs presented in this table have a significant effect of treatment (P ≤ 0.05)
2OTU = operational taxonomic unit to 97% identity, numbered based on highest percent abundance and continuing in decreasing order
3Base-C = forage only diet for continuous challenge model, Base-I = forage only diet for intermittent challenge model, INT = SARA inducing diet for intermittent challenge model, CONT-1 = SARA inducing diet sample after one week of continuous challenge model, CONT-4 = SARA inducing diet sample after 4 weeks of continuous challenge model.
4Contrasts refers to orthogonal contrast analysis
5NCBI = National Center for Biotechnology Information
6Percent identity (%)
a,b For each variable, means in the same feeding model within the same row differ, superscripts are based on Tukey's HSD test.
Fig 1Mean values of OTUs combined with significant variation between continuous and interrupted challenge models.
Fig 2Principal coordinate analysis of the beta-diversity of rumen in-situ samples using weighted UniFrac.
Analysis by PERMANOVA revealed a diet effect (P = 0.001) and an effect of feeding phase (P = 0.03).
Fig 3Mean percent relative abundance of family groups between diets.
(A) Decreasing percent abundance (B) Increasing percent abundance in the SARA diet in comparison to the forage diet.
Fig 4Effect of in situ incubation time on OTUs classified by the GreenGenes database.
Pearson correlation coefficients for OTUs with rumen environmental parameters.
| OTU | Greengenes taxonomic classification (97%) | DMI | Mean pH | Duration of time (min) spend under pH 5.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | ns | -0.63 | 0.50 | |
| 12 | 0.60 | ns | ns | |
| 21 | ns | -0.73 | 0.64 | |
| 33 | ns | -0.50 | ns | |
| 34 | ns | 0.55 | ns | |
| 35 | ns | 0.61 | -0.50 | |
| 38 | -0.57 | 0.61 | -0.53 | |
| 46 | -0.56 | 0.54 | ns | |
| 47 | -0.61 | 0.63 | -0.54 |
ns: not significant
1Analysis was performed for OTUs (≥0.5% of the relative abundance) which showed a significant effect of treatment. All OTUs shown in this table had a P< 0.001 for the given correlations.
2OTU = operational taxonomic unit to 97% identity, ranked in decreasing order based on total percent abundance
3DMI = dry matter intake (kg per day)
Predicted functional pathway analysis using the Kyoto Encyclepedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG).
| KEGG Pathway ID | Intermittent Feeding | Continous Feeding | SEM | Insitu Incubation (hours) | SEM | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base-I | INT | Base-C | CONT-1 | CONT-4 | 24h | 48h | Phase | Time | Phase × Time | |||
| Cell cycle | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.005 | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.37 | 0.24 |
| Cytoskeleton proteins | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.5 | 0.48 | 0.009 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.006 | 0.01 | 0.8 | 0.36 |
| Bacterial secretion system | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.016 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.06 | 0.46 |
| Chromosome | 1.93 | 1.99 | 1.93 | 2.02 | 2.03 | 0.015 | 2 | 1.96 | 0.01 | < 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.87 |
| Transcription factors | 1.84 | 1.92 | 1.81 | 1.93 | 1.77 | 0.038 | 1.84 | 1.87 | 0.024 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.2 |
| DNA replication proteins | 1.61 | 1.53 | 1.63 | 1.58 | 1.57 | 0.018 | 1.58 | 1.59 | 0.012 | 0.007 | 0.55 | 0.91 |
| Transcription machinery | 1.39 | 1.21 | 1.40 | 1.28 | 1.26 | 0.03 | 1.28 | 1.34 | 0.019 | < 0.001 | 0.04 | 0.53 |
| Translation factors | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.7 | 0.006 | 0.7 | 0.71 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.95 |
| Base excision repair | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.005 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.32 | 0.82 |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | 2.33 | 2.29 | 2.35 | 2.30 | 2.28 | 0.017 | 2.3 | 2.32 | 0.011 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.87 |
| Amino acid related enzymes | 1.87 | 1.85 | 1.88 | 1.84 | 1.88 | 0.009 | 1.87 | 1.86 | 0.006 | 0.01 | 0.49 | 0.09 |
| Methane metabolism | 1.65 | 1.63 | 1.67 | 1.63 | 1.54 | 0.028 | 1.59 | 1.66 | 0.018 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.31 |
| Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism | 1.57 | 1.59 | 1.57 | 1.60 | 1.63 | 0.01 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.006 | 0.002 | 0.95 | 0.03 |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 1.46 | 1.47 | 1.46 | 1.45 | 1.42 | 0.011 | 1.44 | 1.46 | 0.007 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.48 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | 1.37 | 1.24 | 1.38 | 1.29 | 1.37 | 0.025 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.016 | 0.001 | 0.73 | 0.54 |
| Carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes | 1.29 | 1.21 | 1.30 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 0.016 | 1.24 | 1.27 | 0.01 | < 0.001 | 0.09 | 0.84 |
| Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.16 | 0.011 | 1.14 | 1.12 | 0.007 | < 0.001 | 0.13 | 0.75 |
| Fructose and mannose metabolism | 0.91 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.017 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.65 | 0.62 |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.90 | 0.98 | 0.92 | 0.021 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.57 | 0.52 |
| Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.008 | 0.8 | 0.81 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.23 | 0.55 |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 0.83 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.015 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.8 |
| One carbon pool by folate | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.79 | 0.8 | 0.006 | < 0.001 | 0.35 | 0.74 |
| Galactose metabolism | 0.69 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 | 0.014 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.009 | 0.04 | 0.97 | 0.58 |
| Glycerophospholipid metabolism | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.007 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.004 | 0.03 | 0.84 | 0.27 |
| Propanoate metabolism | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.008 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.47 | 0.51 |
| Thiamine metabolism | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.006 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.004 | 0.002 | 0.86 | 0.49 |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.52 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.012 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.007 | < 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.67 |
| Pentose and glucuronate interconversions | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.016 | 0.51 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 0.008 | 0.31 | 0.61 |
Values are least squares means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
a,b For each variable, means in the same feeding model within the same row differ, superscripts are based on Tukey's HSD test.
1Base-C = forage only diet for continuous challenge model, Base-I = forage only diet for intermittent challenge model, INT = SARA inducing diet for intermittent challenge model, CONT-1 = SARA inducing diet sample after one week of continuous challenge model, CONT-4 = SARA inducing diet sample after 4 weeks of continuous challenge model.
Correlation analysis of significant predicted functional functional pathways (KEGG) to rumen environmental parameters.
| KEGG Predicted Functional Pathway | Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) / | Mean pH | Duration (min) under pH 5.8 | DMI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metabolism | |||||
| Energy Metabolism | Carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes | r | 0.80 | -0.72 | -0.42 |
| < .0001 | < .0001 | 0.01 | |||
| Energy Metabolism | Oxidative phosphorylation | r | 0.50 | -0.28 | -0.20 |
| Metabolism of Cofactors and Vitamins | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.21 | ||
| One carbon pool by folate | r | 0.60 | -0.41 | -0.30 | |
| < .0001 | 0.01 | 0.06 | |||
| Carbohydrate Metabolism | Propanoate metabolism | r | 0.53 | -0.45 | -0.38 |
| 0.0004 | 0.004 | 0.01 | |||
| Carbohydrate Metabolism | Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | r | -0.61 | 0.49 | 0.43 |
| < .0001 | 0.001 | 0.01 | |||
| Nucleotide Metabolism | Pyrimidine metabolism | r | 0.65 | -0.67 | -0.43 |
| < .0001 | < .0001 | 0.01 | |||
Values are least squares means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
1 Kyoto Encyclepedia of Genes and Genomes
2 DMI = dry matter intake (kg per day)