| Literature DB >> 28757760 |
Jonny Karunia Fajar1, Mohd Andalas2,3, Harapan Harapan1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The mode of delivery in breech presentation (BP) is controversial. Several studies have reported the advantages and disadvantages of delivery mode in BP. The aim of this study was to compare the Apgar scores in BPs between vaginal and cesarean delivery.Entities:
Keywords: Apgar score; Breech presentation; Cesarean delivery; Vaginal delivery
Year: 2017 PMID: 28757760 PMCID: PMC5509192 DOI: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_5_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi
Figure 1Flow chart of the study. BP: Breech presentation; BWE: Birth weight estimation
Summary of odds ratio and 95% confidence interval regarding the association of Apgar scores of breech presentation with the mode of delivery
| Apgar score | Mode of delivery | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pervaginal, | Perabdominal, | |||
| 1st min | 0.0001 | |||
| <7 | 28 (53.8) | 12 (7.8) | 6.462 (2.476-16.870) | |
| ≥7 | 24 (46.2) | 141 (92.2) | ||
| 5th min | 0.0180 | |||
| <7 | 17 (32.7) | 2 (1.3) | 7.727 (1.416-42.175) | |
| ≥7 | 35 (67.3) | 151 (98.7) | ||
OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, P: Significance, n: Amount of the patients
Figure 2Forest plot of the association between Apgar scores in breech presentations and mode of delivery in various studies
Summary of the comparison of this study with other several studies regarding the association of the mode of delivery for breech presentation and their outcomes
| First author name and year | BP | Total labor | Vaginal labor | Cesarean section | Population | OR | 95% CI | VAS (>7/<7) | CAS (>7/<7) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main | 240 | NA | NA | NA | US | NA | NA | NA | 0.0010 | NA | NA |
| Thorpe-Beeston | 3447 | 117,000 | 961 | 2486 | UK | 1.52 | 1.04 | 2.22 | 0.0300 | 917/44 | 2410/76 |
| Albrechtsen | 1212 | 41,026 | 639 | 573 | Norway | 16.39 | 5.93 | 45.25 | 0.0001 | 573/66 | 168/4 |
| Irion | 705 | 32,230 | 385 | 320 | Switzerland | 2.52 | 0.51 | 12.56 | 0.2600 | 379/6 | 318/2 |
| Hannah | 646 | 2088 | 88 | 558 | Canada | 1.70 | 0.75 | 3.93 | 0.2000 | 80/8 | 527/31 |
| Herbst and Thorngren-Jerneck, 2001 | 1050 | 30,641 | 603 | 447 | Sweden | NA | NA | NA | 0.0020 | NA | NA |
| Golfier | 1116 | NA | 414 | 702 | France | 2.18 | 1.50 | 3.18 | 0.0001 | 347/67 | 645/57 |
| Gilbert | 100,667 | 3,271,092 | 4952 | 95,715 | California | 1.50 | 1.30 | 1.60 | 0.0001 | NA | NA |
| Rietberg | 28,750 | 350,609 | 16,975 | 11,775 | Netherlands | 4.83 | 4.13 | 5.65 | 0.0001 | 15,760/1215 | 11,590/185 |
| Goffinet | 8105 | 264,105 | 2526 | 5579 | France and Belgium | 3.17 | 1.92 | 5.25 | 0.0001 | 2465/37 | 5547/26 |
| Our results | 205 | 5252 | 52 | 153 | Indonesia | 36.67 | 8.10 | 166.10 | 0.0001 | 35/17 | 151/2 |
BP: Breech presentation, US: United States, UK: United Kingdom, NA: Not available, OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence interval, P: Significance, VAS: Vaginal labor Apgar score, CAS: Cesarean section Apgar score