Literature DB >> 11084565

Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.

E L Mozurkewich1, E K Hutton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare a trial of labor with elective repeat cesarean delivery among women with previous cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1989 through 1999 with the following terms: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, trial of labor, trial of scar, and uterine rupture. We included all controlled trials from developed countries in which the control group had been eligible for a trial of labor. Outcomes of interest were uterine rupture, hysterectomy, maternal febrile morbidity, maternal mortality, 5-minute Apgar score <7, and fetal or neonatal mortality. We computed pooled odds ratios for each outcome.
RESULTS: The search strategy identified 52 controlled studies, 37 of which were excluded because many of the control subjects were not eligible for a trial of labor. Fifteen studies with a total of 47,682 women were included. Uterine rupture occurred more frequently among women undergoing a trial of labor than among those undergoing elective repeat cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-3.05). There was no difference in maternal mortality risk between the 2 groups (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-6.38). Fetal or neonatal death (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.28) and 5-minute Apgar scores <7 (odds ratio, 2.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.88) were more frequent in the trial of labor group than in the control group. Mothers undergoing a trial of labor were less likely to have febrile morbidity (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.77) or to require transfusion (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.76) or hysterectomy (odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.57).
CONCLUSION: A trial of labor may result in small increases in the uterine rupture rate and in fetal and neonatal mortality rates with respect to elective repeat cesarean delivery. Maternal morbidity, including febrile morbidity, and the need for transfusion or hysterectomy may be reduced with a trial of labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084565     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.108890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  28 in total

1.  Clinical indications and determinants of the rise of cesarean section in three hospitals in rural China.

Authors:  Cheng Qin; Min Zhou; William M Callaghan; Samuel F Posner; Jun Zhang; Cynthia J Berg; Gengli Zhao
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-10

2.  The UTAH VBAC Study.

Authors:  Greg Gochnour; Stephen Ratcliffe; Mary Bishop Stone
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

3.  Neonatal mortality risk for repeat cesarean compared to vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States, 1998-2002 birth cohorts.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2010-03

Review 4.  Neonatal morbidity and mortality after elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Caroline Signore; Mark Klebanoff
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

5.  Effect of interpregnancy interval on the success rate of trial of labor after cesarean.

Authors:  A L Rietveld; P W Teunissen; B M Kazemier; C J M De Groot
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  Labour and Childbirth After Previous Caesarean Section: Recommendations of the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OEGGG).

Authors:  P Reif; C Brezinka; T Fischer; P Husslein; U Lang; A Ramoni; H Zeisler; P Klaritsch
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Ravi M Patel; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Induction of labor with prostaglandin e2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix.

Authors:  Abdul-Kareem Alsayegh; Salah Roshdy; A Hany Akef; S Maha Youssef
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2007-07

9.  The utility of clinical care pathways in determining perinatal outcomes for women with one previous caesarean section; a retrospective service evaluation.

Authors:  Sikolia Z Wanyonyi; Robinson N Karuga
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Ioannis Mylonas; Klaus Friese
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.