Literature DB >> 24157495

Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly?

D Mostello1, J J Chang2, F Bai2, J Wang3, C Guild4, K Stamps2, T L Leet2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether congenital anomalies are associated with breech presentation at the time of birth. STUDY
DESIGN: A population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted among 460,147 women with singleton live births using the Missouri Birth Defects Registry, which includes all defects diagnosed during the first year of life. Maternal and obstetric characteristics and outcomes between breech and cephalic presentation groups were compared using χ(2)-square statistic and Student's t-test. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT: At least one congenital anomaly was more likely present among infants breech at birth (11.7%) than in those with cephalic presentation (5.1%), whether full-term (9.4 vs 4.6%) or preterm (20.1 vs 11.6%). The relationship between breech presentation and congenital anomaly was stronger among full-term births (aOR 2.09, CI 1.96, 2.23, term vs 1.40, CI 1.26, 1.55, preterm), but not in all categories of anomalies.
CONCLUSION: Breech presentation at delivery is a marker for the presence of congenital anomaly. Infants delivered breech deserve special scrutiny for the presence of malformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24157495     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2013.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  25 in total

1.  The perinatal mortality in breech deliveries and observations on affecting factors. A retrospective study of 2227 cases.

Authors:  O Kauppila
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1975

2.  Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database. The Eurofetus Team.

Authors:  H Grandjean; D Larroque; S Levi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Neonatal recognition of familial dysautonomia.

Authors:  F B Axelrod; R F Porges; M E Sein
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Breech presentation.

Authors:  D P Cruikshank
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.

Authors:  R M Mickey; S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Age at diagnosis of birth defects.

Authors:  Carol Bower; Edwina Rudy; Ann Callaghan; Jennifer Quick; Natasha Nassar
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-04

7.  Fetal presentation during pregnancy.

Authors:  T Sørensen; E Hasch; A P Lange
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-09-01       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Singleton breech presentation in labor: experience in 1980.

Authors:  M L Gimovsky; R H Paul
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Birth defects surveillance in Florida: infant death certificates as a case ascertainment source.

Authors:  Jean Paul Tanner; Jason L Salemi; Kimberlea W Hauser; Jane A Correia; Sharon M Watkins; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-09-14

Review 10.  Routine screening for fetal anomalies: expectations.

Authors:  James D Goldberg
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Impact of Fetal Anomalies on Contemporary Labor Patterns.

Authors:  Anna C McCormick; Jennifer J McIntosh; Weihua Gao; Judith U Hibbard; Meredith O Cruz
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Comparison of Apgar scores in breech presentations between vaginal and cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jonny Karunia Fajar; Mohd Andalas; Harapan Harapan
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  A comparison of risk factors for breech presentation in preterm and term labor: a nationwide, population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Anna E Toijonen; Seppo T Heinonen; Mika V M Gissler; Georg Macharey
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Neonatal Mortality and Long-Term Outcome of Infants Born between 27 and 32 Weeks of Gestational Age in Breech Presentation: The EPIPAGE Cohort Study.

Authors:  Elie Azria; Gilles Kayem; Bruno Langer; Laetitia Marchand-Martin; Stephane Marret; Jeanne Fresson; Véronique Pierrat; Catherine Arnaud; François Goffinet; Monique Kaminski; Pierre-Yves Ancel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cesarean deliveries and maternal weight retention.

Authors:  Kandice A Kapinos; Olga Yakusheva; Marianne Weiss
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.