Literature DB >> 7899027

A selective history of the study of visual motion aftereffects.

N J Wade1.   

Abstract

The visual motion aftereffect (MAE) was initially described after observation of movements in the natural environment, like those seen in rivers and waterfalls: stationary objects appeared to move briefly in the opposite direction. In the second half of the nineteenth century the MAE was displaced into the laboratory for experimental enquiry with the aid of Plateau's spiral. Such was the interest in the phenomenon that a major review of empirical and theoretical research was written in 1911. In the latter half of the present century novel stimuli (like drifting gratings, isoluminance patterns, spatial and luminance ramps, random-dot kinematograms, and first-order and second-order motions), introduced to study space and motion perception generally, have been applied to examine MAEs. Developing theories of cortical visual processing have drawn upon MAEs to provide a link between psychophysics and physiology; this has been most pronounced in the context of monocular and binocular channels in the visual system, the combination of colour and contour information, and in the cortical sites most associated with motion processing. The relatively unchanging characteristic of the study of MAEs has been the mode of measurement: duration continues to be used as an index of its strength, although measures of threshold elevation and nulling with computer-generated motions are becoming more prevalent. The MAE is a part of the armoury of motion phenomena employed to uncover the mysteries of vision. Over the last 150 years it has proved itself immensely adaptable to the shifts of fashion in visual science, and it is likely to continue in this vein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7899027     DOI: 10.1068/p231111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  12 in total

1.  Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; P van Hof; M J van der Smagt; F A Verstraten
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Motion adaptation in chromatic motion-onset visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  D J McKeefry
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices.

Authors:  Wen Li; Erin Luxenberg; Todd Parrish; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Neural basis of 3-D shape aftereffects.

Authors:  Andrea Li; Belinda Tzen; Alevtina Yadgarova; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Scopes of perception: the experimental manipulation of space and time.

Authors:  N J Wade; D Heller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997

6.  Stable individual signatures in object localization.

Authors:  Anna Kosovicheva; David Whitney
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Fore-aft translation aftereffects.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensory adaptation and short term plasticity as Bayesian correction for a changing brain.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Beau Cronin; Mriganka Sur; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Testing neuronal accounts of anisotropic motion perception with computational modelling.

Authors:  William Wong; Nicholas Seow Chiang Price
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interdependent Mechanisms for Processing Gender and Emotion: The Special Status of Angry Male Faces.

Authors:  Daniel A Harris; Vivian M Ciaramitaro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.