Literature DB >> 28740685

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups.

Daniel Fudulu1, Harriet Lewis1, Umberto Benedetto1, Massimo Caputo1, Gianni Angelini1, Hunaid A Vohra1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) aims to preserve the sternal integrity and improve postoperative outcomes. In low risk patients, this technique can be achieved with comparable mortality to the conventional approach and there is evidence of possible reduction in intensive care and hospital length of stay, transfusion requirement, renal dysfunction, improved respiratory function and increased patient satisfaction. In this review, we aim to asses if these benefits can be transferred to the high risk patient groups. We therefore, discuss the available evidence for the following high risk groups: elderly patients, re-operative surgery, poor lung function, pulmonary hypertension, obesity, concomitant procedures and high risk score cohorts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgical procedures; aortic valve; elderly; left ventricular (LV) dysfunction; reoperation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28740685      PMCID: PMC5506162          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  77 in total

1.  Assessment based on EuroSCORE of ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Marie De Smet; Benoît Rondelet; Jean-Luc Jansens; Martine Antoine; Didier De Cannière; Jean-Louis Le Clerc
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2004-03

2.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Trilogy Aortic Valve System: multicenter experience.

Authors:  Ingo Breitenbach; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker; Leo A Bockeria; Jerzy Sadowski; Christoph Schmitz; Boguslaw Kapelak; Krzysztof Bartus; Ravil Muratov; Wolfgang Harringer
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Octogenarians undergoing cardiac surgery outlive their peers: a case for early referral.

Authors:  S C Stoica; F Cafferty; J Kitcat; R J F Baskett; M Goddard; L D Sharples; F C Wells; S A M Nashef
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in octogenarian, high-risk, transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.

Authors:  Andrew W ElBardissi; Prem Shekar; Gregory S Couper; Lawrence H Cohn
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Jessie J Zhou; Nithya Niranjan; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

6.  Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.

Authors:  Daniyar Gilmanov; Pier Andrea Farneti; Matteo Ferrarini; Filippo Santarelli; Michele Murzi; Antonio Miceli; Marco Solinas; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-10

7.  The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: A comparison of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Augusto D'Onofrio; Stefano Salizzoni; Antonino S Rubino; Laura Besola; Claudia Filippini; Ottavio Alfieri; Antonio Colombo; Marco Agrifoglio; Theodor Fischlein; Filippo Rapetto; Giuseppe Tarantini; Magnus Dalèn; Davide Gabbieri; Bart Meuris; Carlo Savini; Giuseppe Gatti; Marco Luigi Aiello; Fausto Biancari; Ugolino Livi; Pier Luigi Stefàno; Mauro Cassese; Bruno Borrello; Mauro Rinaldi; Carmelo Mignosa; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Mitral valve surgery and acute renal injury: port access versus median sternotomy.

Authors:  Brian J McCreath; Madhav Swaminathan; John V Booth; Barbara Phillips-Bute; Sophia T H Chew; Donald D Glower; Mark Stafford-Smith
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Sutureless aortic valve bioprothesis '3F/ATS Enable'--4.5 years of a single-centre experience.

Authors:  Jerzy Sadowski; Bogusław Kapelak; Roman Pfitzner; Krzysztof Bartuś
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.108

10.  Sutureless aortic valve implantation through an upper v-type ministernotomy: an innovative approach in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Concistrè; Antonio Miceli; Francesca Chiaramonti; Pierandrea Farneti; Stefano Bevilacqua; Egidio Varone; Marco Solinas; Mattia Glauber
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb
View more
  4 in total

1.  Minimally-invasive versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: systematic review with meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.

Authors:  Mathew P Doyle; Kei Woldendorp; Martin Ng; Michael P Vallely; Michael K Wilson; Tristan D Yan; Paul G Bannon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Partial upper sternotomy for aortic valve replacement provides similar mid-term outcomes as the full sternotomy.

Authors:  Tomas Holubec; Petr Kacer; Jan Hlavicka; David Janda; Petr Budera; Petr Tousek; Marek Maly; Richard Fojt; Hana Linkova
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Efficacy of Aortic Valve Replacement through Full Sternotomy and Minimal Invasion (Ministernotomy).

Authors:  Hammad M A Aliahmed; Rimantas Karalius; Arūnas Valaika; Arimantas Grebelis; Palmyra Semėnienė; Rasa Čypienė
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Early and late outcomes after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in obese patients.

Authors:  Giovanni Mariscalco; Paola D'Errigo; Fausto Biancari; Stefano Rosato; Francesco Musumeci; Marco Barbanti; Marco Ranucci; Gennaro Santoro; Gabriella Badoni; Danilo Fusco; Martina Ventura; Corrado Tamburino; Fulvia Seccareccia
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 3.318

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.