Literature DB >> 19784899

Sutureless aortic valve bioprothesis '3F/ATS Enable'--4.5 years of a single-centre experience.

Jerzy Sadowski1, Bogusław Kapelak, Roman Pfitzner, Krzysztof Bartuś.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with acquired heart malformations, including aortic valve disease, is still challenging. Due to ageing of population, patients undergoing valve surgery are older than in the past. The 3F Therapeutics, conducting a programme of construction of heart valves for transarterial or transapical implatation, prepared the 'Enable' bioprosthetic valve for sutureless insertion in the aortic position. The first world implantation was performed in our Department on 13 January 2005. AIM: To present our experience, qualification criteria and methods of implantation of sutureless bioprosthesis of aortic valve 'Enable'.
METHODS: The 'Enable' valve is a tubular structure, tailored and sutured of equine pericardium, treated with glutaraldehyde, and mounted on an openwork Nitinol" alloy stent. It consists of two distal rings connected with three vertical sticks. The characteristic property of nitinol is thermoplaticity: due to refrigeration it becomes elastic and easy to bend, after rewarming returns to the initial dimensions and shape, remaining stable at the body temperature. Distension of the nitinol ring make possible strong mounting of the valve in aortic annulus. The examined group consised of 27 patients (16 males, 11 females), aged 60-78 years (average 69.5), with advanced aortic valve disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and aortic gradient up to 102 mmHg. Exclusion criteria were: severe annular deformations or bicuspid aortic valve, other valves' malformations, coronary disease, severe other comorbidities or no agreement for 'Enable' valve implantation. The patients were operated using extracorporeal circulation, general moderate hypothermia and cold crystalloid cardioplegia. Care was taken to remove calcifications, estimate of aortic annulus geometry, valve size selection, and orientation of the valve toward coronary ostia The mounting time was approximately one min, and the aorta cross-clamp time was reduced to 26-56 min, mean 30 min.
RESULTS: There was no mortality in the perioperative period, and during 3 months to 4.5 years of follow-up. No severe complications were present after surgery. One patient needed reoperation on post operative day 4 due to severe perivalvular leak. One other patient presented discrete leak with no need for intervention. The clinical improvement of one to three NYHA classes was observed. Echocardiographic and MSCT examinations confirmed adequate position of the valves, no structural deteriorations, normal movement and coaptation of the leaflets. The average maximal transvalvular gradient was 11.6 mmHg and the mean gradient--6.8 mmHg, which remained stable during the follow-up period. No thromboembolic or infective complications were present.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) The 'Enable' aortic bioprosthetic valve has very good hemodynamic properties. (2) Self-expanding thermoplastic nitinol-made ring allows permanent stable mounting. (3) The quick fixation (about 1 min) significantly shortens the operation time. (4) The 'Enable' valve seems to be suitable for patients with increased periopertive risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19784899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kardiol Pol        ISSN: 0022-9032            Impact factor:   3.108


  10 in total

Review 1.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Yi-Chin Tsai; Nithya Niranjan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Tristan D Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

2.  Comparison of radial deformability of stent posts of different aortic bioprostheses.

Authors:  Martins Kalejs; Romans Lacis; Vladimir Kasyanov; Iveta Ozolanta; Philippe Abdel Sayed; Peteris Stradins; Ludwig Karl von Segesser
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-11-01

3.  Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Fabio Bertoldo; Sara Rita Vacirca; Monica Greci; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A technique of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Authors:  Luke B Henderson; Zuorui Song; Xiaotian Sun; John P Pirris
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Transcatheter, sutureless and conventional aortic-valve replacement: a network meta-analysis of 16,432 patients.

Authors:  Declan Lloyd; Jessica G Y Luc; Ben Elias Indja; Vannessa Leung; Nelson Wang; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Mid-term follow-up after suture-less aortic heart valve implantation.

Authors:  Grzegorz Filip; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Boguslaw Kapelak; Jacek Piatek; Magdalena Bartus; Janusz Konstanty-Kalandyk; Maciej Brzezinski; Krzysztof Bartus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups.

Authors:  Daniel Fudulu; Harriet Lewis; Umberto Benedetto; Massimo Caputo; Gianni Angelini; Hunaid A Vohra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Evaluation of the Rebound Hernia Repair device for laparoscopic hernia repair.

Authors:  Gonzalo Torres-Villalobos; Laura Sorcic; George R Ruth; Rafael Andrade; Luis A Martin-del-Campo; J Kyle Anderson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Perceval Sutureless Valve - are Sutureless Valves Here?

Authors:  Rahul Chandola; Kevin Teoh; Abdelsalam Elhenawy; George Christakis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2015

10.  Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Sutureless versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Yesim Guner; Ayse Çiçek; Mehmet Karacalilar; Burak Ersoy; Mugisha Kyaruzi; Burak Onan
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-05-23
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.