Literature DB >> 20674945

Sutureless aortic valve replacement with the Trilogy Aortic Valve System: multicenter experience.

Ingo Breitenbach1, Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker, Leo A Bockeria, Jerzy Sadowski, Christoph Schmitz, Boguslaw Kapelak, Krzysztof Bartus, Ravil Muratov, Wolfgang Harringer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the modular sutureless Arbor Trilogy Aortic Valve System (Arbor Surgical Technologies, Irvine, Calif), designed for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: In a prospective multicenter study, 32 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis underwent aortic valve replacement with the Trilogy valve between 2006 and 2008. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6 patients. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at baseline, at discharge, at 4 to 6 months, at 11 to 14 months, and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: Valve implantation was successful in 30 patients. The procedure was converted to conventional aortic valve replacement in 2 patients. Mean bypass time was 111 ± 42 minutes, and crossclamp time was 70 ± 23 minutes. Valve implantation took 21 ± 7 minutes. The transvalvular gradients at discharge were 10 ± 3 mm Hg (mean) and 20 ± 7 mm Hg (peak), and the effective orifice area was 1.9 ± 0.4 cm(2). At 2-year follow-up, gradients were 7 ± 3 mm Hg (mean) and 14 ± 4 mm Hg (peak), and the effective orifice area was 1.9 ± 0.3 cm(2). There was no intraoperative mortality: Two patients died of causes unrelated to the valve during follow-up. One redo aortic valve replacement was performed at 22 months for prosthetic valve endocarditis.
CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless aortic valve replacement is feasible and safe with the Trilogy System. After an initial learning curve, the modular valve design allows a more rapid and simple implantation compared with conventional stented tissue valves. The simplicity may also facilitate a greater adoption of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement by a broader spectrum of surgeons.
Copyright © 2010 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20674945     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.06.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  16 in total

Review 1.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Yi-Chin Tsai; Nithya Niranjan; Denis Bouchard; Thierry P Carrel; Otto E Dapunt; Harald C Eichstaedt; Theodor Fischlein; Borut Gersak; Mattia Glauber; Axel Haverich; Martin Misfeld; Peter J Oberwalder; Giuseppe Santarpino; Malakh Lal Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Marco Vola; Tristan D Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 2.  Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Jessie J Zhou; Nithya Niranjan; Marco Di Eusanio; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

Review 3.  What are the current results of sutureless valves in high-risk aortic valve disease patients?

Authors:  Amir H Sepehripour; Leanne Harling; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-17

4.  Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Fabio Bertoldo; Sara Rita Vacirca; Monica Greci; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Sutureless versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: Outcomes in 70 High-Risk Patients Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Procedures.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; Mehmet Ali Yuruk; Ali Ihsan Parlar; Ugur Ziyrek; Ali Kemal Arslan; Ufuk Sayar; Ilker Mataraci
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-02-01

6.  A technique of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: an alternative to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Authors:  Luke B Henderson; Zuorui Song; Xiaotian Sun; John P Pirris
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hiroshi Furukawa; Kazuo Tanemoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-31

8.  Transcatheter, sutureless and conventional aortic-valve replacement: a network meta-analysis of 16,432 patients.

Authors:  Declan Lloyd; Jessica G Y Luc; Ben Elias Indja; Vannessa Leung; Nelson Wang; Kevin Phan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Mid-term follow-up after suture-less aortic heart valve implantation.

Authors:  Grzegorz Filip; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Boguslaw Kapelak; Jacek Piatek; Magdalena Bartus; Janusz Konstanty-Kalandyk; Maciej Brzezinski; Krzysztof Bartus
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Changing trends in aortic valve procedures over the past ten years-from mechanical prosthesis via stented bioprosthesis to TAVI procedures-analysis of 50,846 aortic valve cases based on a Polish National Cardiac Surgery Database.

Authors:  Krzysztof Bartus; Jerzy Sadowski; Radoslaw Litwinowicz; Grzegorz Filip; Marek Jasinski; Marek Deja; Mariusz Kusmierczyk; Szymon Pawlak; Marek Jemielity; Dariusz Jagielak; Piotr Hendzel; Piotr Suwalski; Zdzisław Tobota; Bohdan Maruszewski; Boguslaw Kapelak
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.