Literature DB >> 28735897

RADX Promotes Genome Stability and Modulates Chemosensitivity by Regulating RAD51 at Replication Forks.

Huzefa Dungrawala1, Kamakoti P Bhat1, Rémy Le Meur2, Walter J Chazin2, Xia Ding3, Shyam K Sharan3, Sarah R Wessel1, Aditya A Sathe1, Runxiang Zhao1, David Cortez4.   

Abstract

RAD51 promotes homology-directed repair (HDR), replication fork reversal, and stalled fork protection. Defects in these functions cause genomic instability and tumorigenesis but also generate hypersensitivity to cancer therapeutics. Here we describe the identification of RADX as an RPA-like, single-strand DNA binding protein. RADX is recruited to replication forks, where it prevents fork collapse by regulating RAD51. When RADX is inactivated, excessive RAD51 activity slows replication elongation and causes double-strand breaks. In cancer cells lacking BRCA2, RADX deletion restores fork protection without restoring HDR. Furthermore, RADX inactivation confers chemotherapy and PARP inhibitor resistance to cancer cells with reduced BRCA2/RAD51 pathway function. By antagonizing RAD51 at forks, RADX allows cells to maintain a high capacity for HDR while ensuring that replication functions of RAD51 are properly regulated. Thus, RADX is essential to achieve the proper balance of RAD51 activity to maintain genome stability.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA2; CXorf57; PARP inhibitor; RAD51; RPA; SMARCAL1; ZRANB3; double-strand break; fork reversal; homologous recombination; replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735897      PMCID: PMC5548441          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  76 in total

1.  ATRIP binding to replication protein A-single-stranded DNA promotes ATR-ATRIP localization but is dispensable for Chk1 phosphorylation.

Authors:  Heather L Ball; Jeremy S Myers; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.

Authors:  Luis Ignacio Toledo; Matthias Altmeyer; Maj-Britt Rask; Claudia Lukas; Dorthe Helena Larsen; Lou Klitgaard Povlsen; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Niels Mailand; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Holliday junction processing enzymes as guardians of genome stability.

Authors:  Shriparna Sarbajna; Stephen C West
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Secondary somatic mutations restoring BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Barbara Norquist; Kaitlyn A Wurz; Christopher C Pennil; Rochelle Garcia; Jenny Gross; Wataru Sakai; Beth Y Karlan; Toshiyasu Taniguchi; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases.

Authors:  Rémy Bétous; Frank B Couch; Aaron C Mason; Brandt F Eichman; Maria Manosas; David Cortez
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  A role for the MRN complex in ATR activation via TOPBP1 recruitment.

Authors:  Anja M Duursma; Robert Driscoll; Josh E Elias; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Degradation of Escherichia coli DNA: evidence for limitation in vivo by protein X, the recA gene product.

Authors:  G Satta; L J Gudas; A B Pardee
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1979-01-05

8.  The basic cleft of RPA70N binds multiple checkpoint proteins, including RAD9, to regulate ATR signaling.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Sivaraja Vaithiyalingam; Gloria G Glick; Daniel A Mordes; Walter J Chazin; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair.

Authors:  Stephen C Kowalczykowski
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 10.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  72 in total

Review 1.  A tough row to hoe: when replication forks encounter DNA damage.

Authors:  Darshil R Patel; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  RADX controls RAD51 filament dynamics to regulate replication fork stability.

Authors:  Madison B Adolph; Taha M Mohamed; Swati Balakrishnan; Chaoyou Xue; Florian Morati; Mauro Modesti; Eric C Greene; Walter J Chazin; David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  PARPi focus the spotlight on replication fork protection in cancer.

Authors:  Katharina Schlacher
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 4.  Replication-Coupled DNA Repair.

Authors:  David Cortez
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.

Authors:  Sarah A Joseph; Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Jen-Wei Huang; Raquel Cuella-Martin; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-15

Review 6.  Mechanisms of direct replication restart at stressed replisomes.

Authors:  Brooke A Conti; Agata Smogorzewska
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-08-16

Review 7.  Functions of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF in maintaining genome stability.

Authors:  Lisa A Poole; David Cortez
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 8.  How cells ensure correct repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Joonyoung Her; Samuel F Bunting
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Main steps in DNA double-strand break repair: an introduction to homologous recombination and related processes.

Authors:  Lepakshi Ranjha; Sean M Howard; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 10.  RPA and RAD51: fork reversal, fork protection, and genome stability.

Authors:  Kamakoti P Bhat; David Cortez
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.