Literature DB >> 32971328

Time for remodeling: SNF2-family DNA translocases in replication fork metabolism and human disease.

Sarah A Joseph1, Angelo Taglialatela1, Giuseppe Leuzzi1, Jen-Wei Huang1, Raquel Cuella-Martin1, Alberto Ciccia2.   

Abstract

Over the course of DNA replication, DNA lesions, transcriptional intermediates and protein-DNA complexes can impair the progression of replication forks, thus resulting in replication stress. Failure to maintain replication fork integrity in response to replication stress leads to genomic instability and predisposes to the development of cancer and other genetic disorders. Multiple DNA damage and repair pathways have evolved to allow completion of DNA replication following replication stress, thus preserving genomic integrity. One of the processes commonly induced in response to replication stress is fork reversal, which consists in the remodeling of stalled replication forks into four-way DNA junctions. In normal conditions, fork reversal slows down replication fork progression to ensure accurate repair of DNA lesions and facilitates replication fork restart once the DNA lesions have been removed. However, in certain pathological situations, such as the deficiency of DNA repair factors that protect regressed forks from nuclease-mediated degradation, fork reversal can cause genomic instability. In this review, we describe the complex molecular mechanisms regulating fork reversal, with a focus on the role of the SNF2-family fork remodelers SMARCAL1, ZRANB3 and HLTF, and highlight the implications of fork reversal for tumorigenesis and cancer therapy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; DNA damage; Genomic instability; Innate Immunity; Replication fork remodeling; Replication stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32971328      PMCID: PMC8092973          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  293 in total

Review 1.  Functions of SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF in maintaining genome stability.

Authors:  Lisa A Poole; David Cortez
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Genetic interaction mapping in mammalian cells using CRISPR interference.

Authors:  Dan Du; Assen Roguev; David E Gordon; Meng Chen; Si-Han Chen; Michael Shales; John Paul Shen; Trey Ideker; Prashant Mali; Lei S Qi; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  EZH2 promotes degradation of stalled replication forks by recruiting MUS81 through histone H3 trimethylation.

Authors:  Beatrice Rondinelli; Ewa Gogola; Hatice Yücel; Alexandra A Duarte; Marieke van de Ven; Roxanne van der Sluijs; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Jos Jonkers; Raphaël Ceccaldi; Sven Rottenberg; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  SMARCAL1 maintains telomere integrity during DNA replication.

Authors:  Lisa A Poole; Runxiang Zhao; Gloria G Glick; Courtney A Lovejoy; Christine M Eischen; David Cortez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  TrxG and PcG proteins but not methylated histones remain associated with DNA through replication.

Authors:  Svetlana Petruk; Yurii Sedkov; Danika M Johnston; Jacob W Hodgson; Kathryn L Black; Sina K Kovermann; Samantha Beck; Eli Canaani; Hugh W Brock; Alexander Mazo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  DNA Polymerase Delta Synthesizes Both Strands during Break-Induced Replication.

Authors:  Roberto A Donnianni; Zhi-Xiong Zhou; Scott A Lujan; Amr Al-Zain; Valerie Garcia; Eleanor Glancy; Adam B Burkholder; Thomas A Kunkel; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  SIRF: Quantitative in situ analysis of protein interactions at DNA replication forks.

Authors:  Sunetra Roy; Jessica W Luzwick; Katharina Schlacher
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Helicase-like transcription factor (Hltf) gene-deletion promotes oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) in colorectal tumors of AOM/DSS-treated mice.

Authors:  Rebecca A Helmer; Gurvinder Kaur; Lisa A Smith; Beverly S Chilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection.

Authors:  Thomas Costelloe; Raphaël Louge; Nozomi Tomimatsu; Bipasha Mukherjee; Emmanuelle Martini; Basheer Khadaroo; Kenny Dubois; Wouter W Wiegant; Agnès Thierry; Sandeep Burma; Haico van Attikum; Bertrand Llorente
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Bacillus subtilis PriA Winged Helix Domain Is Critical for Surviving DNA Damage.

Authors:  Lindsay A Matthews; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.476

2.  REV1-Polζ maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient cancer cells through mutagenic repair of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps.

Authors:  Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Vincenzo Sannino; Raquel Cuella-Martin; Jen-Wei Huang; Foon Wu-Baer; Richard Baer; Vincenzo Costanzo; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 3.  PCNA Loaders and Unloaders-One Ring That Rules Them All.

Authors:  Matan Arbel; Karan Choudhary; Ofri Tfilin; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Strand annealing and motor driven activities of SMARCAL1 and ZRANB3 are stimulated by RAD51 and the paralog complex.

Authors:  Swagata Halder; Lepakshi Ranjha; Angelo Taglialatela; Alberto Ciccia; Petr Cejka
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 19.160

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.