Literature DB >> 28735839

Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures: a detailed survey of 711 patients in a metropolitan area.

Daniele Passaretti1, Vittorio Candela2, Pasquale Sessa2, Stefano Gumina2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Literature lacks data concerning several epidemiologic aspects of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs).
METHODS: This retrospective study included 711 consecutive patients (209 men, 502 women) who sustained a PHF in the last 3 years. Participants were divided into 2 groups, adults and children. Data regarding age, sex, date, and fracture side were collected. According to the mechanism of injury, we arbitrarily distinguished 7 subgroups. PHFs were classified according to the head-greater-lesser-shaft (HGLS)-Hertel classification and to the Salter-Harris classification using x-ray and computed tomography imaging.
RESULTS: PHFs represent 5.03% of the overall fractures. The right side was involved in 389 patients (54.7%; P = .6). The mean age of male and female patients was 55.4 (standard deviation,  21.9) years and 67.0 (standard deviation, 16.1) years, respectively (P = .0001). Significant differences in the trauma mechanism between female patients (street/home low-energy trauma) and male patients (high-energy trauma) were found. A significant correlation between trauma mechanisms from 1 to 5 and fracture patterns H-G-L-S, HL-G-S, HGL-S, and HLS-G was observed. The occurrence of the same patterns significantly varied according to different age subgroups. Considering the pediatric population, a significant incidence of Salter-Harris 2 in both genders was found. No correlation was observed between the fracture patterns and the trauma mechanism.
CONCLUSIONS: PHFs have a higher prevalence and incidence in females and in older age, respectively; they are more frequent in the winter months. In addition, male fractures are due to different traumatic events than those in females. A correlation between trauma and PHF pattern was evident only for adults. Some fracture patterns are correlated with different ranges of age in all patients.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hertel classification; Proximal humeral fractures; Salter-Harris classification; proximal humeral fractures epidemiology; proximal humerus trauma mechanisms; shoulder fractures

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28735839     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  25 in total

1.  The Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fracture Using Internal Fixation with Fixed-angle Plates.

Authors:  Patrick Ziegler; Sven Maier; Ulrich Stöckle; Markus Gühring; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  [Fracture analysis, indication for endoprosthesis and implant selection in proximal humeral fractures].

Authors:  M Kimmeyer; V Rentschler; J Schmalzl; C Gerhardt; L J Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-14

3.  No change in outcome ten years following locking plate repair of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Rachel Ranson; Rachel Roller; Nicket Dedhia; Connor P Littlefield; Sanjit Konda; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth Egol
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 4.  [Post-traumatic necrosis of the humeral head-Endoprosthesis or joint preservation].

Authors:  A Wegner; D Wassenaar; A Busch; M Stanjek; C Mayer; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Long-stemmed Hemiarthroplasty with Cerclage Wiring for the Treatment of Split-Head Fractures of the Proximal Humerus with Metaphyseal Extension: A Report of 2 Cases.

Authors:  A Panagopoulos; K Solou; A Kouzelis; S Papagiannis; I Tatani; Z T Kokkalis
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-06-14

6.  Incidence and risk factors for pseudosubluxation of the humeral head following proximal humerus fracture.

Authors:  Carl M Cirino; David E Kantrowitz; Frank S Cautela; Michael Gao; Paul J Cagle; Bradford O Parsons
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-22

7.  Comparison of CFR-PEEK and conventional titanium locking plates for proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective controlled study of patient outcomes.

Authors:  A Padolino; G Porcellini; B Guollo; E Fabbri; G N Kiran Kumar; P Paladini; G Merolla
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

8.  Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail.

Authors:  Greta Lorenz; Wolfgang Schönthaler; Wolfgang Huf; Micha Komjati; Christian Fialka; Sandra Boesmueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Trends in incidence of proximal humerus fractures, surgical procedures and outcomes among elderly hospitalized patients with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2013).

Authors:  Maria Angeles Martinez-Huedo; Rodrigo Jiménez-García; Eduardo Mora-Zamorano; Valentín Hernández-Barrera; Manuel Villanueva-Martinez; Ana Lopez-de-Andres
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  [Application of suspensory external fixation technique in treatment of proximal humeral fracture].

Authors:  Yonghui Zhao; Shaoquan Pu; Hao Yin; Qian Lü; Yongqing Xu; Yueliang Zhu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.