Literature DB >> 33624464

[Application of suspensory external fixation technique in treatment of proximal humeral fracture].

Yonghui Zhao1, Shaoquan Pu2, Hao Yin3, Qian Lü2, Yongqing Xu2, Yueliang Zhu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of suspensory external fixation technique in treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS: Between August 2013 and October 2018, 14 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with suspensory external fixation technique. There were 10 males and 4 females with an average age of 55.9 years (range, 43-76 years). There were 10 cases of falling injury and 4 cases of traffic accident injury. Among them, there were 9 cases of Neer type Ⅲ and 5 cases of Neer type Ⅳ. The time from injury to operation was 3-7 days (mean, 4.6 days). Nine cases were complicated with osteoporosis. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 6.1±1.2. The effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated by hospital stay, fracture healing time, removal time of external fixator, postoperative complications, VAS score, and Neer score of shoulder joint function.
RESULTS: All operations were successfully completed, and the hospital stay was 6-14 days, with an average of 9.4 days. All the incisions healed by first intention, and no infection or other complications occurred. All patients were followed up 16-60 months (mean, 35.4 months). X-ray films examination showed that all fractures healed, the healing time was 4-7 months (mean, 4.9 months). The removal time of external fixator was 5-8 months (mean, 6.3 months). VAS scores were 1.5±0.8 at 1 month after operation and 1.0±0.9 at last follow-up, both of which were significantly improved when compared with preoperative score, the differences were significant between different time points ( P<0.05). Neer score of shoulder joint function was 75-100 (mean, 91.1); 9 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, and 1 case was fair. The excellent and good rate was 92.9%. During follow-up, there was no adverse events such as acromion impingement, nonunion, or pseudoarthrosis.
CONCLUSION: For proximal humeral fractures, the suspensory external fixation technique is a simple and reliable treatment method that can significantly improve joint function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Proximal humeral fracture; shoulder joint; suspensory external fixation technique

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33624464      PMCID: PMC8171674          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202009016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  17 in total

1.  The incidence of proximal humeral fractures in New York State from 1990 through 2010 with an emphasis on operative management in patients aged 65 years or older.

Authors:  Omar Khatib; Ikemefuna Onyekwelu; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 2.  A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert C Sproul; Jaicharan J Iyengar; Zlatko Devcic; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique.

Authors:  G Konrad; J Bayer; P Hepp; C Voigt; H Oestern; M Kääb; C Luo; M Plecko; K Wendt; W Köstler; N Südkamp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Preoperative assessment of the cancellous bone mineral density of the proximal humerus using CT data.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Tobias Roth; Martin Gschwentner; Armin Suckert; Michael Blauth; Clemens Hengg; Franz Kralinger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Reducing Postoperative Fracture Displacement After Locked Plating of Proximal Humerus Fractures: Current Concepts.

Authors:  Jared M Newman; Mani Kahn; Konrad I Gruson
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2015-07

6.  Minimally invasive polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis for 3-4 part proximal humeral fractures: our institutional experience.

Authors:  Héctor J Aguado; Juan Mingo; Miguel Torres; Aranzazú Alvarez-Ramos; Miguel A Martín-Ferrero
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates.

Authors:  Juan Agudelo; Matthias Schürmann; Philip Stahel; Peter Helwig; Steven J Morgan; Wolfgang Zechel; Christian Bahrs; Anand Parekh; Bruce Ziran; Allison Williams; Wade Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant.

Authors:  Michael J Gardner; Sreevathsa Boraiah; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases.

Authors:  D Gallinet; P Clappaz; P Garbuio; Y Tropet; L Obert
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 10.  A scoping review of the proximal humerus fracture literature.

Authors:  Gerard P Slobogean; Herman Johal; Kelly A Lefaivre; Norma J MacIntyre; Sheila Sprague; Taryn Scott; Pierre Guy; Peter A Cripton; Michael McKee; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.