Literature DB >> 28733907

Multiple intracranial aneurysms: a direct hemodynamic comparison between ruptured and unruptured vessel malformations.

Philipp Berg1, Oliver Beuing2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite numerous studies addressing the rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms that have been published, the assessment thereof still remains challenging. Image-based simulations enable a precise prediction of patient-specific blood flow information. However, those approaches normally consider only small segments of the complete cerebral vasculature.
METHODS: To test the validity of the consideration of single aneurysms in one computational setup, domains of the complete anterior and posterior circulations with multiple intracranial aneurysms (MIA) were simulated. Six patients with MIA were investigated, while 3D surfaces of eleven unruptured and six ruptured aneurysms were segmented. The segmentations were used for the determination of morphological parameters and also for image-based blood flow simulations used to characterize the hemodynamic properties of each aneurysm.
RESULTS: In the geometric comparison, neck aspect ratios of unruptured and ruptured aneurysms did not differ significantly. In contrast, size ratios, aspect ratios, surface areas, volumes, and non-sphericity indices were significantly higher in the ruptured cases. The analysis of hemodynamic parameters demonstrated that in each patient, the ruptured aneurysm exhibited the lowest averaged wall shear stresses and highest oscillatory shears. Unstable flow was also detected in ruptured aneurysms based on increased oscillatory velocity.
CONCLUSION: In this small study involving patients with MIA, different morphologies and flow patterns were observed between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. The analysis of the hemodynamics in such patients revealed a good agreement with studies that only considered single malformations. Additionally, complex flow patterns are detected in ruptured cases, which require deeper investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational fluid dynamics; Hemodynamics; Multiple intracranial aneurysms; Rupture risk

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28733907     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1643-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  36 in total

1.  Point: CFD--computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination.

Authors:  D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? The role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  J Xiang; V M Tutino; K V Snyder; H Meng
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.

Authors:  M A Castro; C M Putman; J R Cebral
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  CFD for evaluation and treatment planning of aneurysms: review of proposed clinical uses and their challenges.

Authors:  Bongjae Chung; Juan Raul Cebral
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Hemodynamic Differences Between Ruptured and Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Simultaneously Existing in the Same Location: 2 Case Reports and Proposal of a Novel Parameter Oscillatory Velocity Index.

Authors:  Takanori Sano; Fujimaro Ishida; Masanori Tsuji; Kazuhiro Furukawa; Shinichi Shimosaka; Hidenori Suzuki
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Does the DSA reconstruction kernel affect hemodynamic predictions in intracranial aneurysms? An analysis of geometry and blood flow variations.

Authors:  P Berg; S Saalfeld; S Voß; T Redel; B Preim; G Janiga; O Beuing
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Multiple intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients.

Authors:  T Inagawa
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Size ratio: a morphological factor predictive of the rupture of cerebral aneurysm?

Authors:  Meihua Li; Zhiqun Jiang; Huiqiang Yu; Tao Hong
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  L-D Jou; D H Lee; H Morsi; M E Mawad
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Young-Gyun Jeong; Yong-Tae Jung; Moo-Seong Kim; Choong-Ki Eun; Sang-Hwan Jang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-01-31
View more
  7 in total

1.  Novel Models for Identification of the Ruptured Aneurysm in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage with Multiple Aneurysms.

Authors:  H Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; J Wang; N Varble; S-I Sugiyama; A Shimizu; L Jing; J Liu; X Yang; A H Siddiqui; J M Davies; H Meng
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Semiautomatic neck curve reconstruction for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment based on morphological parameters.

Authors:  Sylvia Saalfeld; Philipp Berg; Annika Niemann; Maria Luz; Bernhard Preim; Oliver Beuing
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH)-phase II: rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Philipp Berg; Samuel Voß; Gábor Janiga; Sylvia Saalfeld; Aslak W Bergersen; Kristian Valen-Sendstad; Jan Bruening; Leonid Goubergrits; Andreas Spuler; Tin Lok Chiu; Anderson Chun On Tsang; Gabriele Copelli; Benjamin Csippa; György Paál; Gábor Závodszky; Felicitas J Detmer; Bong J Chung; Juan R Cebral; Soichiro Fujimura; Hiroyuki Takao; Christof Karmonik; Saba Elias; Nicole M Cancelliere; Mehdi Najafi; David A Steinman; Vitor M Pereira; Senol Piskin; Ender A Finol; Mariya Pravdivtseva; Prasanth Velvaluri; Hamidreza Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; Nikhil Paliwal; Hui Meng; Santhosh Seshadhri; Sreenivas Venguru; Masaaki Shojima; Sergey Sindeev; Sergey Frolov; Yi Qian; Yu-An Wu; Kent D Carlson; David F Kallmes; Dan Dragomir-Daescu; Oliver Beuing
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Multimodal validation of focal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms as a surrogate marker for aneurysm instability.

Authors:  Naomi Larsen; Charlotte Flüh; Sylvia Saalfeld; Samuel Voß; Georg Hille; David Trick; Fritz Wodarg; Michael Synowitz; Olav Jansen; Philipp Berg
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Rupture risk assessment for multiple intracranial aneurysms: why there is no need for dozens of clinical, morphological and hemodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Belal Neyazi; Vanessa M Swiatek; Martin Skalej; Oliver Beuing; Klaus-Peter Stein; Jörg Hattingen; Bernhard Preim; Philipp Berg; Sylvia Saalfeld; I Erol Sandalcioglu
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 6.570

6.  Luminal enhancement in intracranial aneurysms: fact or feature?-A quantitative multimodal flow analysis.

Authors:  Franziska Gaidzik; Mariya Pravdivtseva; Naomi Larsen; Olav Jansen; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Philipp Berg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Can Endovascular Treatment of Fusiform Intracranial Aneurysms Restore the Healthy Hemodynamic Environment?-A Virtual Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sylvia Saalfeld; Janneck Stahl; Jana Korte; Laurel Morgan Miller Marsh; Bernhard Preim; Oliver Beuing; Yurii Cherednychenko; Daniel Behme; Philipp Berg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.