Literature DB >> 16971618

Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.

M A Castro1, C M Putman, J R Cebral.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to show the influence of the upstream parent artery geometry on intraaneurysmal hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms.
METHODS: Patient-specific models of 4 cerebral aneurysms (1 posterior communicating artery [PcomA], 2 middle cerebral artery [MCA], and 1 anterior communicating artery [AcomA]) were constructed from 3D rotational angiography images. Two geometric models were constructed for each aneurysm. One model had the native parent vessel geometry; the second model was truncated approximately 1 cm upstream from the aneurysm, and the parent artery replaced with a straight cylinder. Corresponding finite element grids were generated and computational fluid dynamics simulations were carried out under pulsatile flow conditions. The intra-aneurysmal flow patterns and wall shear stress (WSS) distributions were visualized and compared.
RESULTS: Models using the truncated parent vessel underestimated the WSS in the aneurysms in all cases and shifted the impaction zone to the neck compared with the native geometry. These effects were more pronounced in the PcomA and AcomA aneurysms where upstream curvature was substantial. The MCA aneurysm with a long M1 segment was the least effected. The more laminar flow pattern within the parent vessel in truncated models resulted in a less complex intra-aneurysmal flow patterns with fewer vortices and less velocity at the dome.
CONCLUSIONS: Failure to properly model the inflow stream contributed by the upstream parent artery can significantly influence the results of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic models. The upstream portion of the parent vessel of cerebral aneurysms should be included to accurately represent the intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971618      PMCID: PMC8139802     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  28 in total

1.  Merging of intersecting triangulations for finite element modeling.

Authors:  J R Cebral; R Löhner; P L Choyke; P J Yim
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known.

Authors:  J R WOMERSLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1955-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity.

Authors:  Juan R Cebral; Marcelo A Castro; Sunil Appanaboyina; Christopher M Putman; Daniel Millan; Alejandro F Frangi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Effects of size and shape (aspect ratio) on the hemodynamics of saccular aneurysms: a possible index for surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  H Ujiie; H Tachibana; O Hiramatsu; A L Hazel; T Matsumoto; Y Ogasawara; H Nakajima; T Hori; K Takakura; F Kajiya
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Intraaneurysmal flow dynamics study featuring an acrylic aneurysm model manufactured using a computerized tomography angiogram as a mold.

Authors:  S Tateshima; Y Murayama; J P Villablanca; T Morino; H Takahashi; T Yamauchi; K Tanishita; F Vinuela
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Evaluation of intraaneurysmal blood velocity by time-density curve analysis and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  H Tenjin; F Asakura; Y Nakahara; K Matsumoto; T Matsuo; F Urano; S Ueda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Computational approach to quantifying hemodynamic forces in giant cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Liang-Der Jou; Christopher M Quick; William L Young; Michael T Lawton; Randall Higashida; Alastair Martin; David Saloner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Computational simulation of therapeutic parent artery occlusion to treat giant vertebrobasilar aneurysm.

Authors:  Tamer Hassan; Masayuki Ezura; Eugene V Timofeev; Teiji Tominaga; Tsutomu Saito; Akira Takahashi; Kazuyoshi Takayama; Takashi Yoshimoto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Cerebral blood flow patterns at major vessel bifurcations and aneurysms in rats.

Authors:  H Nakatani; N Hashimoto; Y Kang; N Yamazoe; H Kikuchi; S Yamaguchi; H Niimi
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  In vitro study of haemodynamics in a giant saccular aneurysm model: influence of flow dynamics in the parent vessel and effects of coil embolisation.

Authors:  Y P Gobin; J L Counord; P Flaud; J Duffaux
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Computational fluid dynamics in brain aneurysms.

Authors:  Daniel M Sforza; Christopher M Putman; Juan R Cebral
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Statistical wall shear stress maps of ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms.

Authors:  L Goubergrits; J Schaller; U Kertzscher; N van den Bruck; K Poethkow; Ch Petz; H-Ch Hege; A Spuler
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an in vivo reproducibility study.

Authors:  A J Geers; I Larrabide; A G Radaelli; H Bogunovic; M Kim; H A F Gratama van Andel; C B Majoie; E VanBavel; A F Frangi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Unsteady wall shear stress analysis from image-based computational fluid dynamic aneurysm models under Newtonian and Casson rheological models.

Authors:  Marcelo A Castro; María C Ahumada Olivares; Christopher M Putman; Juan R Cebral
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions in computational fluid dynamics simulations of cerebral aneurysmal hemodynamics.

Authors:  I G H Jansen; J J Schneiders; W V Potters; P van Ooij; R van den Berg; E van Bavel; H A Marquering; C B L M Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries.

Authors:  J R Cebral; M A Castro; C M Putman; N Alperin
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Multiple intracranial aneurysms: a direct hemodynamic comparison between ruptured and unruptured vessel malformations.

Authors:  Philipp Berg; Oliver Beuing
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Quantitative comparison of hemodynamics in simulated and 3D angiography models of cerebral aneurysms by use of computational fluid dynamics.

Authors:  Tatsunori Saho; Hideo Onishi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-04-25

9.  The role of biofluid mechanics in the assessment of clinical and pathological observations: sixth International Bio-Fluid Mechanics Symposium and Workshop, March 28-30, 2008 Pasadena, California.

Authors:  Maria Siebes; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  The role of computational fluid dynamics in the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a clinicians' view.

Authors:  Pankaj K Singh; Alberto Marzo; Stuart C Coley; Guntram Berti; Philippe Bijlenga; Patricia V Lawford; Mari-Cruz Villa-Uriol; Daniel A Rufenacht; Keith M McCormack; Alejandro Frangi; Umang J Patel; D Rodney Hose
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.