Literature DB >> 24029393

CFD: computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination? The role of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

J Xiang1, V M Tutino2, K V Snyder3, H Meng4.   

Abstract

Image-based computational fluid dynamics holds a prominent position in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms, especially as a promising tool to stratify rupture risk. Current computational fluid dynamics findings correlating both high and low wall shear stress with intracranial aneurysm growth and rupture puzzle researchers and clinicians alike. These conflicting findings may stem from inconsistent parameter definitions, small datasets, and intrinsic complexities in intracranial aneurysm growth and rupture. In Part 1 of this 2-part review, we proposed a unifying hypothesis: both high and low wall shear stress drive intracranial aneurysm growth and rupture through mural cell-mediated and inflammatory cell-mediated destructive remodeling pathways, respectively. In the present report, Part 2, we delineate different wall shear stress parameter definitions and survey recent computational fluid dynamics studies, in light of this mechanistic heterogeneity. In the future, we expect that larger datasets, better analyses, and increased understanding of hemodynamic-biologic mechanisms will lead to more accurate predictive models for intracranial aneurysm risk assessment from computational fluid dynamics.
© 2014 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24029393     DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  35 in total

1.  Changes of time-attenuation curve blood flow parameters in patients with and without carotid stenosis.

Authors:  C-J Lin; F-C Chang; W-Y Guo; S-C Hung; C-B Luo; J Beilner; M Kowarschik; W-F Chu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Multiple intracranial aneurysms: a direct hemodynamic comparison between ruptured and unruptured vessel malformations.

Authors:  Philipp Berg; Oliver Beuing
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Flow Instability Detected by High-Resolution Computational Fluid Dynamics in Fifty-Six Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms.

Authors:  Nicole Varble; Jianping Xiang; Ning Lin; Elad Levy; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  What does computational fluid dynamics tell us about intracranial aneurysms? A meta-analysis and critical review.

Authors:  Khalid M Saqr; Sherif Rashad; Simon Tupin; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Tamer Hassan; Teiji Tominaga; Makoto Ohta
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Initial Clinical Experience with AView-A Clinical Computational Platform for Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology, Hemodynamics, and Treatment Management.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Nicole Varble; Jason M Davies; Ansaar T Rai; Kenichi Kono; Shin-Ichiro Sugiyama; Mandy J Binning; Rabih G Tawk; Hoon Choi; Andrew J Ringer; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; L Nelson Hopkins; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Differences in Morphologic and Hemodynamic Characteristics for "PHASES-Based" Intracranial Aneurysm Locations.

Authors:  N Varble; H Rajabzadeh-Oghaz; J Wang; A Siddiqui; H Meng; A Mowla
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  J Xiang; A H Siddiqui; H Meng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  High-fidelity virtual stenting: modeling of flow diverter deployment for hemodynamic characterization of complex intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Robert J Damiano; Ning Lin; Kenneth V Snyder; Adnan H Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013—Phase I: prediction of rupture status in intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  G Janiga; P Berg; S Sugiyama; K Kono; D A Steinman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Hemodynamic-morphological discriminant models for intracranial aneurysm rupture remain stable with increasing sample size.

Authors:  Jianping Xiang; Jihnhee Yu; Kenneth V Snyder; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui; Hui Meng
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 5.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.