Literature DB >> 25186432

CFD for evaluation and treatment planning of aneurysms: review of proposed clinical uses and their challenges.

Bongjae Chung1, Juan Raul Cebral.   

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used for several years to identify mechanical risk factors associated with aneurysmal evolution and rupture as well as to understand flow characteristics before and after surgical treatments in order to help the clinical decision making process. We used the keywords, "CFD" and "aneurysms" to search recent publications since about 2000, and categorized them into (i) studies of rupture risk factors and (ii) investigations of pre- and post-evaluations of surgical treatment with devices like coils and flow diverters (FD). This search enables us to examine the current status of CFD as a clinical tool and to determine if CFD can potentially become an important part of the routine clinical practice for the evaluation and treatment of aneurysms in near future. According to previous reports, it has been argued that CFD has become a quite robust non-invasive tool for the evaluation of surgical devices, especially in the early stages of device design and it has also been applied successfully to the study of rupture risk assessment. However, we find that due to the large number of pre-processing inputs further efforts of validation and reproducibility of CFD with larger clinical datasets are still essential to identify standardized mechanical risk factors. As a result, we identify the following needs to have a robust CFD tool for clinical use: (i) more reliability tests through validation studies, (ii) analyses of larger generalized clinical datasets to find converging universal risk parameters, (iii) fluid structure interaction (FSI) analyses to better understand the detailed vascular remodeling processes associated with aneurysm growth, evolution and rupture, and (iv) better coordinated and organized communications and collaborations between engineers and clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25186432     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-014-1093-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  26 in total

1.  Porcine In Vivo Validation of a Virtual Contrast Model: The Influence of Contrast Agent Properties and Vessel Flow Rates.

Authors:  T W Peach; Y Ventikos; J V Byrne; Z You
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Flow-splitting-based computation of outlet boundary conditions for improved cerebrovascular simulation in multiple intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Sylvia Saalfeld; Samuel Voß; Oliver Beuing; Bernhard Preim; Philipp Berg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Multiple intracranial aneurysms: a direct hemodynamic comparison between ruptured and unruptured vessel malformations.

Authors:  Philipp Berg; Oliver Beuing
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling of contrast transport in basilar aneurysms following flow-altering surgeries.

Authors:  Alireza Vali; Adib A Abla; Michael T Lawton; David Saloner; Vitaliy L Rayz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Computational Fluid Dynamics and Additive Manufacturing to Diagnose and Treat Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Amanda Randles; David H Frakes; Jane A Leopold
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Better Than Nothing: A Rational Approach for Minimizing the Impact of Outflow Strategy on Cerebrovascular Simulations.

Authors:  C Chnafa; O Brina; V M Pereira; D A Steinman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Reconstructing patient-specific cerebral aneurysm vasculature for in vitro investigations and treatment efficacy assessments.

Authors:  Venkat Keshav Chivukula; Michael R Levitt; Alicia Clark; Michael C Barbour; Kurt Sansom; Luke Johnson; Cory M Kelly; Christian Geindreau; Sabine Rolland du Roscoat; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Predisposing factors for recanalization of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular embolization: a multivariate study.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhang; Linkai Jing; Jian Liu; Kun Wang; Ying Zhang; Nikhil Paliwal; Hui Meng; Yang Wang; Shengzhang Wang; Xinjian Yang
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Platelet Dynamics and Hemodynamics of Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverting Stents.

Authors:  Laurel M M Marsh; Michael C Barbour; Venkat Keshav Chivukula; Fanette Chassagne; Cory M Kelly; Samuel H Levy; Louis J Kim; Michael R Levitt; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Computational modeling and engineering in pediatric and congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Alison L Marsden; Jeffrey A Feinstein
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.