Literature DB >> 28729744

Attitudes towards Social Oocyte Freezing from a Socio-cultural Perspective.

Maren Schick1, Réka Sexty1, Beate Ditzen1, Tewes Wischmann1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The tendency to delay parenthood is increasing. It is partly driven by the availability of early reproductive technologies such as social oocyte freezing, the cryopreservation of oocytes for non-medical purposes. The goal of this study was to investigate relationships between attitudes towards social oocyte freezing and different socio-cultural backgrounds in a German sample cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quantitative online questionnaire was compiled. A total of 643 participants completed the questionnaire which included items on attitudes toward social oocyte freezing, socio-demographics and items, obtained from the German DELTA Institute for Social and Ecological Research, devised to indicate specific milieus. Data were analyzed using parametric and non-parametric methods.
RESULTS: There were clear correlations between attitudes towards social oocyte freezing and socio-cultural background, gender, cohort age, fertility problems, and attitudes to fertility. Positive attitudes towards social oocyte freezing were linked to struggles with fertility, a current or general wish to have a child, and flexible, progressive and self-oriented values. Participants who preferred to become parents at a younger age tended to reject cryopreservation.
CONCLUSIONS: The huge number of university graduates, persons with fertility problems, and persons from specific socio-cultural backgrounds in our sample point to distinct groups interested in reproductive technologies such as social oocyte freezing. The investigated differences as a function of socio-cultural background suggest that more research into the desire to have children in German society is needed. In conclusion, it may be necessary to develop targeted family planning interventions to prevent affected women from buying into a false sense of security, thereby risking unwanted childlessness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; cryopreservation; milieus; social oocyte freezing; socio-cultural background

Year:  2017        PMID: 28729744      PMCID: PMC5514017          DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-111412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  22 in total

1.  Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: a survey in women 30-39 years of age.

Authors:  Anna-Lena Wennberg; Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg; Ian Milsom; Mats Brännström
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women's reproductive autonomy?

Authors:  Heidi Mertes
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives.

Authors:  Melinda Mills; Ronald R Rindfuss; Peter McDonald; Egbert te Velde
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 15.610

4.  What do women know about the risks of delayed childbearing?

Authors:  Suzanne Tough; Karen Benzies; Christine Newburn-Cook; Karen Tofflemire; Nonie Fraser-Lee; Alexandra Faber; Reg Sauve
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

5.  A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age.

Authors:  D Stoop; J Nekkebroeck; P Devroey
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users.

Authors:  Kylie Baldwin; Lorraine Culley; Nicky Hudson; Helene Mitchell; Stuart Lavery
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 7.  Fertility preservation for non-medical reasons: controversial, but increasingly common.

Authors:  Michael von Wolff; Ariane Germeyer; Frank Nawroth
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Women's intentions to use fertility preservation to prevent age-related fertility decline.

Authors:  Anne Ter Keurst; Jacky Boivin; Sofia Gameiro
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Still childless at the age of 28 to 40 years: a cross-sectional study of Swedish women's and men's reproductive intentions.

Authors:  E Schytt; A B V Nilsen; E Bernhardt
Journal:  Sex Reprod Healthc       Date:  2013-11-23

10.  What do you know about reproductive medicine?--results of a German representative survey.

Authors:  Yve Stoebel-Richter; Kristina Geue; Ada Borkenhagen; Elmar Braehler; Kerstin Weidner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Postponing Pregnancy Through Oocyte Cryopreservation for Social Reasons: Considerations Regarding Clinical Practice and the Socio-Psychological and Bioethical Issues Involved.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Panagiotis Bakas; Polina Giannelou; Christina Papapetrou; Theodoros Kalampokas; Anna Rapani; Ekaterini Chatzaki; Maria Lambropoulou; Chrysoula Lourida; Efthymios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  Egg freezing for fertility preservation and family planning: a nationwide survey of US Obstetrics and Gynecology residents.

Authors:  Navid Esfandiari; Julia Litzky; Joshua Sayler; Pavel Zagadailov; Karen George; Leslie DeMars
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Women's viewpoints on egg freezing in Austria: an online Q-methodology study.

Authors:  Johanna Kostenzer; Antoinette de Bont; Job van Exel
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.652

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.