Literature DB >> 26099440

Oocyte cryopreservation for social reasons: demographic profile and disposal intentions of UK users.

Kylie Baldwin1, Lorraine Culley2, Nicky Hudson2, Helene Mitchell2, Stuart Lavery3.   

Abstract

A small number of studies from the USA and Europe have provided some data on the profile and characteristics of women who have undergone oocyte cryopreservation for what has been termed elective, social or non-medical reasons; however, little is known in a UK context about which women are undergoing oocyte cryopreservation or their reproductive intentions and actions after the procedure. Drawing on data from an exploratory study of 23 UK resident women who had undergone social oocyte cryopreservation, the demographic profile of these women, their reproductive intentions and actions are discussed, as well as their attitudes and intentions towards their cryopreserved oocytes should they never require them in treatment. The study found that, at the time of oocyte cryopreservation, women were on average 36.7 years of age, were university educated, with 65% of the sample holding further postgraduate or professional qualifications. Fifty-seven per cent of the participants were in professional employment. All participants identified as heterosexual and 87% were not in a relationship at the time of cryopreserving their oocytes. Most (88%) participants stated that they would donate unwanted oocytes to research or to other women for use in fertility treatment should they never require them.
Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  oocyte cryopreservation; reproductive intentions; social egg freezing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26099440     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  31 in total

1.  For whom the egg thaws: insights from an analysis of 10 years of frozen egg thaw data from two UK clinics, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Zeynep B Gürtin; Lucy Morgan; David O'Rourke; Jinjun Wang; Kamal Ahuja
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Likelihood of achieving a 50%, 60%, or 70% estimated live birth rate threshold with 1 or 2 cycles of planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Bat-Sheva L Maslow; Michael M Guarnaccia; Leslie Ramirez; Joshua U Klein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Maren Shapiro; Clarisa Gracia; Suneeta Senapati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Transitioning from Infertility-Based (ART 1.0) to Elective (ART 2.0) Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the DOHaD Hypothesis: Do We Need to Change Consenting?

Authors:  Paolo Rinaudo; Amanda Adeleye
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 1.303

5.  Attitudes towards Social Oocyte Freezing from a Socio-cultural Perspective.

Authors:  Maren Schick; Réka Sexty; Beate Ditzen; Tewes Wischmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of infertility, fertility assessment, and assisted reproductive technologies in the era of oocyte freezing among female and male university students.

Authors:  C Meissner; C Schippert; Frauke von Versen-Höynck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ran Kim; Tae Ki Yoon; Inn Soo Kang; Mi Kyoung Koong; Yoo Shin Kim; Myung Joo Kim; Yubin Lee; Jayeon Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Social Freezing in Medical Practice. Experiences and Attitudes of Gynecologists in Germany.

Authors:  Maximilian Schochow; Giovanni Rubeis; Grit Büchner-Mögling; Hansjakob Fries; Florian Steger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Social Egg Freezing: Developing Countries Are Not Exempt.

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-11-13

10.  Patient-centered elective egg freezing: a binational qualitative study of best practices for women's quality of care.

Authors:  Marcia C Inhorn; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Lynn M Westphal; Joseph Doyle; Norbert Gleicher; Dror Meirow; Martha Dirnfeld; Daniel Seidman; Arik Kahane; Pasquale Patrizio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.