Literature DB >> 21212052

A survey on the intentions and attitudes towards oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons among women of reproductive age.

D Stoop1, J Nekkebroeck, P Devroey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although cryopreservation of semen is a routine procedure for preserving male gametes, an efficient method of preserving fertility through oocyte freezing has only recently become available for women. In view of the limited female reproductive lifespan, oocyte freezing can now offer women some protection against the decline in fertility with aging.
METHODS: A survey was performed in Belgium among 1914 women of reproductive age (21-40 years) to assess public attitudes towards the phenomenon called 'social oocyte freezing'. Women were questioned on their awareness of the age-related fertility decline and their views and intentions towards considering undergoing oocyte cryopreservation.
RESULTS: The electronic questionnaire was completed by 1049 women, giving a response rate of 55%, and 25 were excluded as they were incomplete/inconsistent. Our results demonstrate that 31.5% of respondents consider themselves as potential social oocyte freezers, of which 3.1% would definitely consider the procedure. Just over half of the women (51.8%) would not consider the procedure while 16.7% indicated they had no opinion. Potential oocyte freezers are characterized by a higher number of desired children and more openness to oocyte donation. The decision to actually embark on such treatment would primarily depend on conditions, such as the procedure not affecting their natural fertility and the health of future children.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a significant proportion of young women would consider safeguarding their reproductive potential or are at least open to the idea of social oocyte freezing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21212052     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  31 in total

1.  Live birth from oocytes cryopreserved with slow-freezing protocol and thawed after 6 years of storage.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista La Sala; Francesco Capodanno; Barbara Valli; Ilaria Rondini; Maria Teresa Villani; Alessia Nicoli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  ART results with frozen oocytes: data from the Italian ART registry (2005-2013).

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele P E Levi-Setti; Andrea Borini; Pasquale Patrizio; Simone Bolli; Vincenzo Vigiliano; Roberto De Luca; Giulia Scaravelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Is employer coverage of elective egg freezing coercive?: a survey of medical students' knowledge, intentions, and attitudes towards elective egg freezing and employer coverage.

Authors:  Deborah E Ikhena-Abel; Rafael Confino; Nirali J Shah; Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Jared C Robins; Mary Ellen Pavone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Survival and post-warming in vitro competence of human oocytes after high security closed system vitrification.

Authors:  N De Munck; G Verheyen; L Van Landuyt; D Stoop; H Van de Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A combination of hydroxypropyl cellulose and trehalose as supplementation for vitrification of human oocytes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Aila Coello; Pilar Campos; José Remohí; Marcos Meseguer; Ana Cobo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  For whom the egg thaws: insights from an analysis of 10 years of frozen egg thaw data from two UK clinics, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Zeynep B Gürtin; Lucy Morgan; David O'Rourke; Jinjun Wang; Kamal Ahuja
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Assessing reproductive choices of women and the likelihood of oocyte cryopreservation in the era of elective oocyte freezing.

Authors:  Lauren W Milman; Suneeta Senapati; Mary D Sammel; Katherine D Cameron; Clarisa Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Attitudes towards Social Oocyte Freezing from a Socio-cultural Perspective.

Authors:  Maren Schick; Réka Sexty; Beate Ditzen; Tewes Wischmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Age-specific probability of live birth with oocyte cryopreservation: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aylin Pelin Cil; Heejung Bang; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of infertility, fertility assessment, and assisted reproductive technologies in the era of oocyte freezing among female and male university students.

Authors:  C Meissner; C Schippert; Frauke von Versen-Höynck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.