Literature DB >> 26611498

Women's intentions to use fertility preservation to prevent age-related fertility decline.

Anne Ter Keurst1, Jacky Boivin2, Sofia Gameiro3.   

Abstract

The optimal age to cryopreserve oocytes for later use is before 36 years. Current users are on average 38 years old. In this cross-sectional study an online survey was constructed about the factors associated with the intentions of childless women aged 28-35 years to use fertility preservation (FP). Questions were derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (attitudes and subjective norms regarding FP and perceived behaviour control to do FP) and the Health Belief Model (perceived susceptibility of infertility, perceived severity of childlessness, barriers and benefits of FP and cue to use FP). Also addressed were parenthood goals, fertility knowledge and intentions to use FP within 2 years. The data were analysed using structural equation modelling. The Health Belief Model showed a good fit to the data (χ(2) [14, n = 257] = 13.63, P = 0.477; CFI = 1.000: RMSEA = 00, 90% CI [0.00-0.06]). Higher intentions to use FP were associated with feeling susceptible to infertility, considering FP useful to achieve parenthood, perceiving the implications of infertility as severe, expecting to have children at a later age and having fewer ethical concerns. This suggests an increase of fertility awareness is necessary for the optimal use of FP.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cryopreservation; fertility; health behaviour; oocytes; psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26611498     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.10.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  10 in total

Review 1.  Global Research Trends on Infertility and Psychology From the Past Two Decades: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study.

Authors:  Hongkun Zhu; Lingli Shi; Rong Wang; Lijuan Cui; Jiahui Wang; Mengyu Tang; Haiqing Qian; Minggang Wei; Lihong Wang; Huifang Zhou; Wenting Xu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 6.055

2.  Attitudes towards Social Oocyte Freezing from a Socio-cultural Perspective.

Authors:  Maren Schick; Réka Sexty; Beate Ditzen; Tewes Wischmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Awareness, knowledge, and perceptions of infertility, fertility assessment, and assisted reproductive technologies in the era of oocyte freezing among female and male university students.

Authors:  C Meissner; C Schippert; Frauke von Versen-Höynck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Decision making processes of women who seek elective oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Ran Kim; Tae Ki Yoon; Inn Soo Kang; Mi Kyoung Koong; Yoo Shin Kim; Myung Joo Kim; Yubin Lee; Jayeon Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A survey on the awareness and knowledge about elective oocyte cryopreservation among unmarried women of reproductive age visiting a private fertility center.

Authors:  Yeon Hee Hong; Jeong Woo Park; Hyein Kim; Seul Ki Kim; Chang Woo Choo; Byung Chul Jee; Chang Suk Suh; Seok Hyun Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Effect of fertility health awareness strategies on fertility knowledge and childbearing in young married couples (FertStart): study protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type I multicentre three-arm parallel group open-label randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Sze Ling Chan; Julian Thumboo; Jacky Boivin; Seyed Ehsan Saffari; Shanqing Yin; Samantha Rachel Yeo; Jerry Kok Yen Chan; Kee Chong Ng; Ka-Hee Chua; Su Ling Yu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Study protocol for fertility preservation discussions and decisions: A family-centered psychoeducational intervention for male adolescents and emerging adults newly diagnosed with cancer and their families.

Authors:  Charis Stanek; Charleen I Theroux; Anna L Olsavsky; Kylie N Hill; Joseph R Rausch; Sarah H O'Brien; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of a novel family-centered values clarification tool on adolescent sperm banking attempts at the time of a new cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Leena Nahata; Taylor M Dattilo; Anna L Olsavsky; Keagan G Lipak; Stacy Whiteside; Nicholas D Yeager; Anthony Audino; James L Klosky; Joseph Rausch; Amanda Saraf; Sarah H O'Brien; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.357

9.  Who benefits from putting family life into ice?

Authors:  Outi Hovatta
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 10.  Elective egg freezing: what is the vision of women around the globe?

Authors:  Susan Nasab; Lindsey Ulin; Chikara Nkele; Jaimin Shah; Mazen E Abdallah; Baha M Sibai
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-03-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.