Literature DB >> 28724752

The Fluid Mechanics of Transcatheter Heart Valve Leaflet Thrombosis in the Neosinus.

Prem A Midha1, Vrishank Raghav1, Rahul Sharma1, Jose F Condado1, Ikechukwu U Okafor1, Tanya Rami1, Gautam Kumar1, Vinod H Thourani1, Hasan Jilaihawi1, Vasilis Babaliaros1, Raj R Makkar1, Ajit P Yoganathan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis has been increasingly reported. In these studies, thrombus quantification has been based on a 2-dimensional assessment of a 3-dimensional phenomenon.
METHODS: Postprocedural, 4-dimensional, volume-rendered CT data of patients with CoreValve, Evolut R, and SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement enrolled in the RESOLVE study (Assessment of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction With Multimodality Imaging and Its Treatment with Anticoagulation) were included in this analysis. Patients on anticoagulation were excluded. SAPIEN 3 and CoreValve/Evolut R patients with and without hypoattenuated leaflet thickening were included to study differences between groups. Patients were classified as having THV thrombosis if there was any evidence of hypoattenuated leaflet thickening. Anatomic and THV deployment geometries were analyzed, and thrombus volumes were computed through manual 3-dimensional reconstruction. We aimed to identify and evaluate risk factors that contribute to THV thrombosis through the combination of retrospective clinical data analysis and in vitro imaging in the space between the native and THV leaflets (neosinus).
RESULTS: SAPIEN 3 valves with leaflet thrombosis were on average 10% further expanded (by diameter) than those without (95.5±5.2% versus 85.4±3.9%; P<0.001). However, this relationship was not evident with the CoreValve/Evolut R. In CoreValve/Evolut Rs with thrombosis, the thrombus volume increased linearly with implant depth (R2=0.7, P<0.001). This finding was not seen in the SAPIEN 3. The in vitro analysis showed that a supraannular THV deployment resulted in a nearly 7-fold decrease in stagnation zone size (velocities <0.1 m/s) when compared with an intraannular deployment. In addition, the in vitro model indicated that the size of the stagnation zone increased as cardiac output decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement thrombosis is a multifactorial process involving foreign materials, patient-specific blood chemistry, and complex flow patterns, our study indicates that deployed THV geometry may have implications on the occurrence of thrombosis. In addition, a supraannular neosinus may reduce thrombosis risk because of reduced flow stasis. Although additional prospective studies are needed to further develop strategies for minimizing thrombus burden, these results may help identify patients at higher thrombosis risk and aid in the development of next-generation devices with reduced thrombosis risk.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAVR; neosinus; thrombosis; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28724752     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  25 in total

Review 1.  Valve durability after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Akash Kataruka; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Three-dimensional extent of flow stagnation in transcatheter heart valves.

Authors:  Vrishank Raghav; Chris Clifford; Prem Midha; Ikechukwu Okafor; Brian Thurow; Ajit Yoganathan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The BASILICA Trial: Prospective Multicenter Investigation of Intentional Leaflet Laceration to Prevent TAVR Coronary Obstruction.

Authors:  Jaffar M Khan; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Toby Rogers; Marvin H Eng; Gaetano Paone; Bradley G Leshnower; Mark Reisman; Lowell Satler; Ron Waksman; Marcus Y Chen; Annette M Stine; Xin Tian; Danny Dvir; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Implantation Depth and Rotational Orientation Effect on Valve-in-Valve Hemodynamics and Sinus Flow.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Jennifer Dollery; Scott M Lilly; Juan A Crestanello; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The role of antiplatelet drug resistance in subclinical leaflet thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hashrul N Rashid; Paul Thein; Arthur Nasis
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Leaflet Laceration to Improve Neosinus and Sinus Flow After Valve-in-Valve.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Pablo Maureira; Scott Lilly; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 7.  Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Matteo Bianchi; Ram P Ghosh; Brandon Kovarovic; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Impact of patient-specific morphologies on sinus flow stasis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Jennifer Dollery; Scott M Lilly; Juan Crestanello; Lakshmi Prasad Dasi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 9.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

10.  Numerical evaluation of transcatheter aortic valve performance during heart beating and its post-deployment fluid-structure interaction analysis.

Authors:  Ram P Ghosh; Gil Marom; Matteo Bianchi; Karl D'souza; Wojtek Zietak; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.