Literature DB >> 28722531

Patterns of renal disease in South Korea: a 20-year review of a single-center renal biopsy database.

Ho Sik Shin1, Dae Hyeon Cho1, Soo Kyoung Kang1, Hyun Jeong Kim1, Soo Young Kim1, Joung Wook Yang1, Gyong Hoon Kang1, Ye Na Kim1, Yeonsoon Jung1, Bong-Kwon Cheon2, Hark Rim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several registries and centers have reported the results of renal biopsies from different parts of the world. As there are few data regarding the epidemiology of glomerulonephritis (GN) in South Korea, we conducted this study on renal biopsy findings during the last 20 years from a single center.
METHODS: Data for 818 patients who underwent renal biopsy at our center between 1992 and 2011 were collected retrospectively. All kidney specimens were examined with light microscopy (LM) and immunofluorescent microscopy (IF).
RESULTS: There were 818 cases of native kidney biopsies. In cases of primary GN, the most frequent type of renal pathology in adults (18-59 years) was mesangial proliferative GN (MsPGN, 34.5%) followed by IgA nephropathy (IgAN, 33.3%) and membranous GN (MGN, 8.8%). Indications in adults (18-59 years) were asymptomatic urinary abnormalities (75.3%) followed by nephrotic syndrome (19.8%) and acute kidney injury (AKI, 3.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among 818 renal biopsy specimens, MsPGN and IgAN were the most frequent biopsy-proven renal diseases. MGN was the third most common cause of primary GN and lupus nephritis (LN) was the most common secondary glomerular disease. Our data contribute to the epidemiology of renal disease in South Korea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IgAN; MGN; MsPGN; Renal disease; renal biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28722531      PMCID: PMC6014498          DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2017.1348955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ren Fail        ISSN: 0886-022X            Impact factor:   2.606


Introduction

Renal biopsy has become one of the cornerstones of nephrology practice and is an important means of diagnosing, providing prognosis and guiding treatment of many renal diseases [1]. The first description of a technique to perform a percutaneous renal biopsy was published by Rober P. Ball in the 1930s [2]. In the 1950s, a more practical and efficient technique was described by Iversen and Brun [3]. With the introduction of the Franklin-modified Vim-Silverman needle in 1954, obtaining kidney tissue for proper histological diagnosis improved by 96–98% [4-6]. Today, most hospitals perform percutaneous renal biopsy using real-time ultrasonography and automated percutaneous devices [7-9]. This technique has improved safety and increased the number of procedures that can be performed. Several noninvasive approaches for identifying early renal damage have been proposed for the evaluation of urine or plasma biomarkers [10]. However, the impact of these biomarkers on long-term outcomes still awaits validation for use in everyday clinical practice. The epidemiology of biopsy confirmed renal disease provides useful information about the prevalence of renal disease and its clinical manifestations. The prevalence of renal disease differs according to the period, geographic area, race, age and indications for renal biopsy [11]. Although diabetes and hypertension are the most frequent causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD), recent evidence indicates that the number of patients starting chronic renal replacement therapy due to glomerular diseases is rising [12]. As there are little data regarding the changing patterns of renal diseases, we conducted this study of renal biopsy findings during the last 20 years at a single center. The aims of this study were to provide a comprehensive report of the relative frequencies of kidney diseases according to clinical presentation and histological diagnoses and to evaluate changing patterns of renal diseases over the past 20 years.

Methods

Patients

The records of adult patients who underwent a renal biopsy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea, from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Data from 818 patients (18–59 years (adults) and ≥60 years (older patients)) who underwent renal biopsy in our center were collected. Data included demographic data and renal syndrome at presentation. All biopsies were analyzed over four 5-year interval. After patients were admitted to the hospital, clinical and laboratory examinations were completed in several days. If no contraindication was determined by the attending physician, then renal biopsy was performed immediately. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to the start of the study.

Pathological examination and diagnosis

All biopsy specimens were examined by the same group of clinicians, pathologists and technicians. Nephrologists performed renal biopsies. All kidney specimens were studied with LM, IF and electron microscopy (EM). EM was performed for select cases in which diagnosis was not definite by LM and IF. The final diagnosis was made for each patient on the basis of both clinical and histologic investigations. Pathological diagnosis was definitively made by combining the results of clinical data, laboratory examination, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy. Indications for native renal biopsy were categorized into five groups: (i) nephrotic syndrome (NS), (ii) asymptomatic urinary abnormalities (AUA), (iii) acute nephritic syndrome, (iv) chronic GN, (v) AKI and (vi) systemic disease. NS was defined as proteinuria ≥3500 mg/day associated with hyperlipidemia, hypoalbuminemia and edema. AUA was defined as subnephrotic proteinuria and/or hematuria with no clinical symptoms or signs. Acute nephritic syndrome was defined as the abrupt onset of hematuria, hypertension, edema, oliguria and reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Chronic GN was defined as irreversible and progressive glomerular and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, ultimately leading to a reduction in the GFR and retention of uremic toxins. Proteinuria was defined as more than 1 g of protein present in urine per day. Incomplete records, inadequate biopsies and the second biopsy in rebiopsy patients were excluded from the analysis. Pathologic results were categorized according to the age of the patients at the time of renal biopsy, that is, 18–59 years (adults) and ≥60 years (older patients). Contraindications for renal biopsy included a solitary or ectopic kidney, horseshoe kidney, uncorrected bleeding disorder, severe uncontrolled hypertension, renal infection, renal neoplasm, hydronephrosis, end-stage renal disease, congenital anomalies, multiple cysts or an uncooperative patient. Primary glomerular diseases (PGN) included minor changes, IgAN, MsPGN, MGN, minimal change disease (MCD), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) and crescentic glomerulonephritis (CGN). Secondary GN included LN, Henoch–Schonlein purpura (HSP), postinfectious GN, amyloidosis, hypertensive nephrotic syndrome (NS), pauci-immune GN, paraproteinemic disorder, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and diabetic nephropathy (DN).

Data analysis

Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations. Discrete variables were compared with categorical and continuous variables by chi-square and t-tests, respectively. The distribution of patients with varying renal biopsy diagnoses between the 5-year interval was calculated using Pearson’s chi-square analysis. A p values <.05 was defined as significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

Data for 818 patients who underwent renal biopsy between 1992 and 2011 were retrospectively investigated. The average age of the patients was 37.2 years and ranged from 18 to 83 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.2:1. The adult group (18–59 years) included 758 cases, and the older group (≥60 years) included 60 cases. Table 1 shows the clinical diagnosis of kidney biopsy according to age. Hematuria (≥3 red blood cells/high power field) was the most common clinical diagnosis of kidney biopsy in adults (41.2%) and proteinuria was the second in adults (39.1%). However, in the older patients, proteinuria was the most common clinical diagnosis for kidney biopsy (28.3%) followed by hematuria (25.0%).
Table 1.

Clinical diagnosis of kidney biopsy according to age.

Diagnoses18–59 years (N = 758 (%))≥60 years (N = 60 (%))
Proteinuria39.128.3
Hematuria41.225.0
Edema14.523.3
Acute kidney injury4.021.7
Chronic kidney injury0.31.7
Hypokalemia0.40
Purpura0.40
Toxin0.20
Clinical diagnosis of kidney biopsy according to age. Information regarding pathologic distributions of native kidney biopsy according to age is summarized in Table 2. PGN was the most common pathologic distribution in all groups (adults: 81.9%, older patients: 71.1%) followed by minor changes (adults: 11.1%, older people: 13.3%).
Table 2.

Pathologic distribution of native kidney biopsy according to age.

Diagnoses18–59 years (N = 758 (%))≥60 years (N = 60(%))
Primary glomerular disease81.971.7
Secondary glomerular disease5.310
Hereditary nephritis0.50
Normal or minor change11.113.3
Tubulointerstitial disease1.15.0
Others0.10
Pathologic distribution of native kidney biopsy according to age. Table 3 presents indications for native kidney biopsy according to age. AUA was the most common indication in adults (75.3%) and older patients (48.3%). NS was second in all groups (adults: 19.8%, older patients: 30.0%).
Table 3.

Indications for native kidney biopsy according to age.

Indications18–59 years (N = 758 (%))≥60 years (N = 60 (%))
Nephrotic syndrome19.830.0
AUA75.348.3
Acute nephritic syndrome0.51.7
Chronic GN0.30
AKI3.420.0
Systemic disease0.70

AKI: acute kidney injury; AUA: asymptomatic urinary abnormality; GN: chronic glomerulonephritis.

Indications for native kidney biopsy according to age. AKI: acute kidney injury; AUA: asymptomatic urinary abnormality; GN: chronic glomerulonephritis. Table 4 shows primary glomerular diseases according to age. In all groups, MsPGN was the most common. The second most common was IgAN followed by MGN in adults. However, MGN was the second most common in older patients.
Table 4.

Primary glomerular disease according to age.

Diagnoses18–59 years; N = 621 (%)≥60 years; N = 43 (%)
IgA nephropathy33.310.3
MsPGN34.523.1
MCD4.25.1
MGN8.817.9
FSGS3.512.8
MPGN7.95.1
Crescentic GN0.910.3
Chronic GN3.110.3
Minor change4.25.1

FSGS: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN: Glomerulonephritis; MCD: minimal change disease; MGN: membranous glomerulonephritis; MPGN: membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; MsPGN: mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis.

Primary glomerular disease according to age. FSGS: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GN: Glomerulonephritis; MCD: minimal change disease; MGN: membranous glomerulonephritis; MPGN: membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; MsPGN: mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. Table 5 shows secondary glomerular diseases according to age. LN was the most common secondary glomerular disease in adults (57.5%) followed by amyloidosis in adults (12.5%).
Table 5.

Secondary glomerular disease according to age.

Diagnoses18–59 years; N = 40 (%)≥60 years; N = 6 (%)
Lupus nephritis57.50
HSP10.016.7
Postinfectious GN7.533.3
Amyloidosis12.50
Hypertensive NS016.7
Pauci-immune GN033.3
Paraproteinemic disorder5.00
HUS5.00
Diabetic nephropathy2.50

GN: glomerulonephritis; HSP: Henoch–Schonlein purpura; HUS: hemolytic uremic syndrome; NS: nephrotic syndrome.

Secondary glomerular disease according to age. GN: glomerulonephritis; HSP: Henoch–Schonlein purpura; HUS: hemolytic uremic syndrome; NS: nephrotic syndrome. Table 6 shows pathologic distributions of hereditary nephritis based on age. Thin basement membrane disease was the most common hereditary nephritis.
Table 6.

Pathologic distribution of hereditary nephritis according to age.

Diagnoses18–59 years; N = 5 (%)≥60 years; N = 0 (%)
Thin BM disease1000

BM: basement membrane.

Pathologic distribution of hereditary nephritis according to age. BM: basement membrane. Figure 1 shows changing trends in primary glomerular disease. The relative frequency of IgAN increased significantly from 5.0% in the first quartile to 43.0% in the last quartile. The relative frequency of MsPGN decreased significantly from 63.8% in the first quartile to only 7.2% in the last quartile. IgAN was the most common primary glomerular disease since 2002. MsPGN and IgAN were the most frequent biopsy-proven renal diseases and lupus nephritis was the most common secondary glomerular disease. In the 5-year quartile comparison, the relative frequency of IgAN increased, while the relative frequency of MsPGN and MPGN decreased significantly during the past 20 years.
Figure 1.

Changing trends in primary glomerular disease. ∗p < .05 compared with the three other time intervals. MsPGN: mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis; MCD: minimal change disease; MGN: membranous glomerulonephritis; FSGS: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; MPGN: membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; CGN: chronic glomerulonephritis.

Changing trends in primary glomerular disease. ∗p < .05 compared with the three other time intervals. MsPGN: mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis; MCD: minimal change disease; MGN: membranous glomerulonephritis; FSGS: focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; MPGN: membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; CGN: chronic glomerulonephritis.

Discussion

In the 5-year quartile comparison, the relative frequency of IgAN increased, while the relative frequency of MsPGN and MPGN decreased significantly during the past 20 years. MsPGN and IgAN were the most frequent biopsy-proven renal diseases, and lupus nephritis was the most common secondary glomerular disease. The rate of kidney biopsies in numerous studies was variable because of different factors [12]. First, there were different time frame of papers [13,14]. In our study, the average age of the patients was 37.2 years and ranged from 10 to 83 years and we conducted this study on renal biopsy findings during the last 20 years (from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 2011). Second, there were lack of kidney biopsy data collection, so data may not show the situation of a given country. Third, the generalizability of data might be affected because of reference source population. Fourth, heterogenity of indications of renal biopsy. Lastly, there were socioeconomic status. There were lower biopsy rate because of the economic problem [15]. In our study, AUA was the most common indication for biopsy in adults (75.3%), and older patients (48.3%). NS was the second most common in all groups (adults: 19.8%, older patients: 30.0%). NS is the most frequent indication for renal biopsy in adults [16]. But, the usefulness and timing of renal biopsy in urinary abnormalities, diabetes, AKI or CKD of unknown origin, still have a debate. Urinary abnormalities emerged as the most common reason for performing renal biopsy in two national registries [17-19] and in two macroregional reports [15,20]. The usefullness of kidney biopsy in patients with isolated non-nephrotic proteinuria is not known. According to the patient’s age, there are different in the diagnostic approach to isolated microscopic hematuria (IMH) [21]. IMH is usually associated with hypercalciuria (30–35%), hyperuricemia (5–20%) and glomerular disease in children [22]. Nonglomerular causes (such as nut-cracker syndrome, lithiasis or neoplastic disease, etc.) should be excluded in adult [21], [23]. If AKI patients had an unknown origin of AKI, AKI duration of more than 3 or 4 weeks [24], or the presence of extra-renal manifestations, suggestive of a systemic disease, non-evidence-based biopsies were usually performed. In our study, AKI was the third most common indication in the elderly (21.4%). In our study, MsPGN was the most common primary GN. The second most common was IgAN in adult group. However, in older patients, MGN was second most common. IgAN represents the most frequent primary, biopsy-proven GN in six out of eight national registries (Italy, Spain, Czech Republic, Denmark, Scotland, Japan) [17-19,25-30], in three macroregions (Western France, Finland, Victoria-Australia) with a range of percentages for total diagnoses, and in seven single-center databases [14,31-36]. The high prevalence may be related to genetic background, since there is evidence that IgAN is linked to a gene on chromosome 6q22–23 [37]. Variations in detection rates are also reflected by regional differences in the recognition of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria or the frequency of renal biopsy. In countries where systematic screening for urinary abnormalities is performed, IgAN is the most frequent primary GN [38]. The most frequent histological patterns related to primary NS in adults are MGN, FSGS and MCD [39]. However, cases of NS were also found to be due to diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), infections, multiple myeloma, amyloidosis or neoplasias [40]. According to the published pathological data of renal biopsy, the distribution spectrum of kidney disease varies throughout the world. In Europe, Oceania and Asia, IgAN is the most common glomerulopathy [25,41-43]. In the United States and Brazil, FSGS is the most common glomerulopathy [44-46]. In Europe, the detection rate of MPGN has tended to drop over time [47]. In the United States, FSGS has tended to rise [48]. In our study, LN was the most common secondary glomerular disease in adults (57.5%) followed by amyloidosis in adults (12.5%). The most frequent secondary GN was lupus nephritis in Spain (8.8%) [27], Italy (2.6 p.m.p./year) [17,25], Brazil (9.8%) [46], Bahrain (15.7%) [49], Australia (13.9%) [13], Romania (7.4%) [50], Korea (8.7%) [34], China [36] and Hong Kong (20.5%) [31]. In our study, the relative frequency of IgAN increased significantly from 5.0% in the first quartile to 43.0% in the last quartile. The relative frequency of MsPGN decreased significantly from 63.8% in the first quartile to only 7.2% in the last quartile. The relative frequency of MPGN decreased significantly during the past 20 years (from 15.4% to 2.0%). IgAN was the most frequent primary glomerular disease since 2002. In this study, MsPGN tended to drop gradually. Mesangial proliferation of many causes should not be regarded as a specific lesion. With this increasing knowledge, the proportion of MsPGN to renal biopsy cases has gradually dropped [32]. Over a 23-year period between 1973 and 1995, MCD and IgAN were the most common primary GN in Korean adults and children. The most common cause of NS was found to be MCD. However, this proportion decreased as the patients increased in age [11]. Recently, a paper regarding changing prevalence of glomerular diseases in Korean adults showed that in a 5-year quartile comparison, the relative frequency of IgAN increased, while the relative frequency of MCD and MPGN decreased significantly during the past 20 years [34]. Another study on the changing prevalence of glomerular diseases in Korean adults found a similar result [51]. The reason for the increased frequency of IgAN is unknown. Changing referral patterns and attitudes toward biopsy for patients with asymptomatic urinary abnormalities are more likely explanations for this increase, rather than more stable influences within a population such as its genetic composition. There have been numerous papers published regarding frequency, histopathological analysis and clinical data of biopsy-proven kidney diseases; however, it is not always easy to compare them due to differences in indications of kidney biopsy. More subclinical IgAN cases have been reported from countries where urinalysis is included in screening programs and asymptomatic urinary abnormalities are considered an indication of kidney biopsy [52]. We also observed a decline in the relative frequency of MPGN, which is common in adults, particularly in countries with a lower socioeconomic status. An alteration in the immune balance of the T helper 1 and 2 subsets has been proposed to explain the predilection for MPGN in developing and poor nations [53]. This could also be explained by the decreased incidence of chronic bacterial infections, improved control of viral hepatitis B or C, and better socioeconomic conditions in developed countries [52]. The rate of kidney disease in older patients is higher.[ [54]. The causes of structural and functional changes of the aging kidney are age and systemic disease (diabetes, hypertension and obesity). That causes can lead to glomerulosclerosis, tubulo-interstitial fibrosis and atrophy, which makes the elderly prone to develop CKD [55-57]. Kidney biopsy in elderly patients cannot differentiate between chronic renal damage and age-related changes. But, pathologic confirmation may be required for a diagnosis, etiological frame-working and treatment [58]. AKI (12–73%) and NS of rapid onset (13–68%) are the two most common indications for renal biopsy in elderly patients [12]. Because the manifestations of renal disease in the older patients occasionally differ from the patterns observed in other age groups [59-61], we suggest that renal biopsy should be performed on an individual basis in order to improve prognosis by providing an accurate diagnosis and enabling the initiation of specific treatment. Our study has a number of limitations. First, data were obtained from a retrospective database of tertiary care hospitals. Second, we did not evaluate hepatitis-related renal disease. Third, the number of patients diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome was small. Although renal biopsy indications did not change over the 20-year period, some patients with kidney diseases refused renal biopsy fearing its complications; therefore, the detection rates of certain pathological types had some extent of inherent bias.

Conclusions

MsPGN and IgAN were the most frequent biopsy-proven renal diseases, and lupus nephritis was the most common secondary glomerular disease. In the 5-year quartile comparison, the relative frequency of IgAN increased, while the relative frequency of MsPGN and MPGN decreased significantly during the past 20 years.
  59 in total

1.  Occurrence of kidney diseases and patterns of glomerular disease based on a 10-year kidney biopsy material: a retrospective single-centre analysis in Estonia.

Authors:  Zivile Riispere; Mai Ots-Rosenberg
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 2.  Urinary proteomics in the assessment of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  William Mullen; Christian Delles; Harald Mischak
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Nationwide and long-term survey of primary glomerulonephritis in Japan as observed in 1,850 biopsied cases. Research Group on Progressive Chronic Renal Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Renal biopsy in very elderly patients: data from the Spanish Registry of Glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Eduardo Verde; Borja Quiroga; Francisco Rivera; Juan M López-Gómez
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.754

5.  Increasing incidence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and an examination of demographic patterns.

Authors:  D Dragovic; J L Rosenstock; S J Wahl; G Panagopoulos; M V DeVita; M F Michelis
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.975

6.  The changing pattern of glomerulonephritis in Singapore over the past two decades.

Authors:  K T Woo; G S Chiang; A Pall; P H Tan; Y K Lau; Y M Chin
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 0.975

7.  The epidemiology and prognosis of glomerulonephritis in Denmark 1985-1997.

Authors:  J Heaf; H Løkkegaard; S Larsen
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.992

8.  Epidemiology of primary glomerular diseases in a French region. Variations according to period and age.

Authors:  P Simon; M P Ramée; V Autuly; E Laruelle; C Charasse; G Cam; K S Ang
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Primary glomerular diseases in Brazil (1979-1999): is the frequency of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis increasing?

Authors:  M Bahiense-Oliveira; L B Saldanha; E L Andrade Mota; D Oliveira Penna; R Toledo Barros; J E Romão-Junior
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.975

Review 10.  Utility of renal biopsy in the clinical management of renal disease.

Authors:  Neeraj Dhaun; Christopher O Bellamy; Daniel C Cattran; David C Kluth
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  8 in total

1.  A Global Evolutionary Trend of the Frequency of Primary Glomerulonephritis over the Past Four Decades.

Authors:  Keng Thye Woo; Choong Meng Chan; Cynthia Lim; Jason Choo; Yok Mooi Chin; Esther Wei Ling Teng; Irene Mok; Jia Liang Kwek; Alwin H L Loh; Hui Lin Choong; Han Kim Tan; Grace S L Lee; Evan Lee; Kok Seng Wong; Puay Hoon Tan; Marjorie Foo
Journal:  Kidney Dis (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Clinical and Pathological Analysis of 4910 Patients Who Received Renal Biopsies at a Single Center in Northeast China.

Authors:  Ping Nie; Rui Chen; Manyu Luo; Changqing Dong; Liangmei Chen; Juan Liu; Liangqian Hu; Bing Li; Ping Luo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Pathological spectrum of glomerular disease in patients with renal insufficiency: a single-center study in Northeastern China.

Authors:  Liangmei Chen; Manyu Luodelete; Changqing Dong; Bing Li; Weiguang Zhang; Ping Nie; Juan Liu; Xiangmei Chen; Ping Luo
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.606

4.  The Association between Serum Hemoglobin and Renal Prognosis of IgA Nephropathy.

Authors:  Tae Ryom Oh; Su Hyun Song; Hong Sang Choi; Chang Seong Kim; Seung Hyeok Han; Kyung Pyo Kang; Young Joo Kwon; Soo Wan Kim; Seong Kwon Ma; Eun Hui Bae
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Clinical and histopathological analyses of kidney biopsies in a single center for 7 years.

Authors:  Seunghye Lee; Sehyun Jung; Mi-Ji Kim; Jong Sil Lee; Ha Nee Jang; Se-Ho Chang; Hyun-Jung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Patterns in renal diseases diagnosed by kidney biopsy: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Taehoon Yim; Sang-Un Kim; Sangmi Park; Jeong-Hoon Lim; Hee-Yeon Jung; Jang-Hee Cho; Chan-Duck Kim; Yong-Lim Kim; Man-Hoon Han; Yong-Jin Kim; Ji-Young Choi; Sun-Hee Park
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-03-31

7.  Current findings of kidney biopsy including nephropathy associated with hypertension and diabetes mellitus in Korea.

Authors:  Kipyo Kim; Sang Ho Lee; Sung Woo Lee; Jung Pyo Lee; Ho Jun Chin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Modulation of IL-6 Expression by KLF4-Mediated Transactivation and PCAF-Mediated Acetylation in Sublytic C5b-9-Induced Rat Glomerular Mesangial Cells.

Authors:  Lu Xia; Yu Liu; Zhiwei Zhang; Yajuan Gong; Tianyi Yu; Dan Zhao; Wen Qiu; Yingwei Wang; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 7.561

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.