Literature DB >> 28720916

Assessing Faculty and Student Interpretations of AACP Survey Items with Cognitive Interviewing.

Samuel C Karpen1, Nicholas E Hagemeier1.   

Abstract

Objective. To use cognitive interviewing techniques to determine faculty and student interpretation of a subset of items from the AACP faculty and graduating student surveys. Methods. Students and faculty were interviewed individually in a private room. The interviewer asked each respondent for his/her interpretation of 15 randomly selected items from the graduating student survey or 20 items from the faculty survey. Results. While many items were interpreted consistently by respondents, the researchers identified several items that were either difficult to interpret or produced differing interpretations. Conclusion. Several interpretational inconsistencies and ambiguities were discovered that could compromise the usefulness of certain survey items.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AACP faculty survey; AACP graduating student survey; cognitive interview; measurement error; qualitative methods

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28720916      PMCID: PMC5508087          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe81588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  QUAID: a questionnaire evaluation aid for survey methodologists.

Authors:  A C Graesser; K Wiemer-Hastings; R Kreuz; P Wiemer-Hastings; K Marquis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-05

2.  The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs.

Authors:  Nisar Ahmed; Janine C Bestall; Sheila A Payne; Bill Noble; Sam H Ahmedzai
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  You Can't Fix by Analysis What You've Spoiled by Design: Developing Survey Instruments and Collecting Validity Evidence.

Authors:  Gretchen Rickards; Charles Magee; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-12

4.  Tracing the steps of survey design: a graduate medical education research example.

Authors:  Charles Magee; Gretchen Rickards; Lynn A Byars; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-03

5.  What Do Our Respondents Think We're Asking? Using Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Medical Education Surveys.

Authors:  Gordon B Willis; Anthony R Artino
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-09

6.  Measuring the quality of care related to pain management: a multiple-method approach to instrument development.

Authors:  Susan Larsen Beck; Gail L Towsley; Patricia H Berry; Jeannine M Brant; Ellen M Lavoie Smith
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Evaluation of qualitative research.

Authors:  Dorothy Horsburgh
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.036

8.  Adapting cognitive interviewing for nursing research.

Authors:  Shigeko Izumi; Roxanne Vandermause; Sandra Benavides-Vaello
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.228

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Situational Judgment Test to Assess Students' Achievement of Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards 3 and 4.

Authors:  Teresa DeLellis; Marwa Noureldin; Sharon K Park; Kelly M Shields; Alicia Bryant; Aleda M H Chen; Heather Mw Petrelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.047

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.