Literature DB >> 28718172

Components of competitor priming in task switching.

Morgan L Teskey1, Michael E J Masson2.   

Abstract

Executing an action in response to a stimulus is thought to result in the creation of an event code that integrates stimulus and action features (Allport, 1987; Hommel in Visual Cognition 5: 183-216, 1998). When switching between tasks, competitor priming occurs if a distractor stimulus cues the retrieval of a previously established event code in which that distractor is bound to a competing task, creating a source of interference with the current task whereby the observer is encouraged to apply the competing task to the distractor. We propose a second aspect of competitor priming: the misapplication of the retrieved competing task to the target stimulus. We report two task-switching experiments in which tasks applied to picture-word compound stimuli were manipulated to create conditions in which this second aspect of competitor priming could be revealed and distinguished from other sources of task- and stimulus-based priming. A substantial increase in competitor priming was observed when subjects switched between tasks that required very different processing operations and the competing task was highly relevant to the target stimulus. These results are consistent with our claim that competitor priming can result from applying the competing task either to the distractor that cued it or to the target stimulus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competitor priming; Event codes; Task switching

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28718172     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0734-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?

Authors:  D Besner; J A Stolz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

2.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: task-mixing and task-switching costs.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Wolfgang Prinz; Alan Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-06-26

4.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  The costs and benefits of cross-task priming.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

6.  How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Hilde Haider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.

Authors:  Denise Nadine Stephan; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-08-21

8.  Bayesian analysis of factorial designs.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey; Josine Verhagen; April R Swagman; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-06-09

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Across-task long-term priming: interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval.

Authors:  Florian Waszak
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.