Gisele Juru Bunogerane1, Kathryn Taylor2, Yihan Lin3, Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri4. 1. Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Republic of Rwanda. Electronic address: jurugizela@gmail.com. 2. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado. 4. Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of General Surgery, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Republic of Rwanda.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: There is a severe surgical workforce shortage in Rwanda. Innovative educational tools must be introduced to train more residents and increase surgical capacity. Touch Surgery (TS) is a smartphone application that offers trainees the opportunity to practice operations; however, its effect is unknown in low- and middle-income countries. Our objectives were to determine the training effect of TS and its feasibility for use in surgery education in a low-resource setting. DESIGN: We performed a randomized control trial of University of Rwanda surgical residents. Participants were blocked by postgraduate year and randomized to textbook or TS for learning tendon repair surgical technique. After the learning period, participants performed a tendon repair simulation, evaluated by blinded expert raters. Presimulation and postsimulation questionnaires tested their knowledge of tendon repair. SETTING: The study was conducted at the simulation center of the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, a tertiary referral and teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included University of Rwanda surgery residents. A total 27 of 51 surgery residents (52.94%) were enrolled. Participating residents represented the following specialties: general surgery (51.85%), orthopedics (40.74%), and urology (7.41%). RESULTS: TS users scored 89.7% on tendon repair simulation, compared to textbook users who scored 63.4% (p < 0.001). Postsimulation questionnaires showed a significant improvement in cognitive scores for TS users (38.6%, p < 0.001), as compared to nonsignificant improvement for textbook users (15.9%, p = 0.304). About 92.3% of TS users reported that TS represents a useful training tool, and 61.5% reported that it would be a good or very good required part of the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: TS is a useful tool to improve both technical skills and knowledge of tendon repair procedure steps; however, its role may be limited to a supplemental tool as it does not improve the theoretical knowledge. TS has the potential to be implemented in a surgical academic curriculum in low- and middle-income countries.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: There is a severe surgical workforce shortage in Rwanda. Innovative educational tools must be introduced to train more residents and increase surgical capacity. Touch Surgery (TS) is a smartphone application that offers trainees the opportunity to practice operations; however, its effect is unknown in low- and middle-income countries. Our objectives were to determine the training effect of TS and its feasibility for use in surgery education in a low-resource setting. DESIGN: We performed a randomized control trial of University of Rwanda surgical residents. Participants were blocked by postgraduate year and randomized to textbook or TS for learning tendon repair surgical technique. After the learning period, participants performed a tendon repair simulation, evaluated by blinded expert raters. Presimulation and postsimulation questionnaires tested their knowledge of tendon repair. SETTING: The study was conducted at the simulation center of the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, a tertiary referral and teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study included University of Rwanda surgery residents. A total 27 of 51 surgery residents (52.94%) were enrolled. Participating residents represented the following specialties: general surgery (51.85%), orthopedics (40.74%), and urology (7.41%). RESULTS: TS users scored 89.7% on tendon repair simulation, compared to textbook users who scored 63.4% (p < 0.001). Postsimulation questionnaires showed a significant improvement in cognitive scores for TS users (38.6%, p < 0.001), as compared to nonsignificant improvement for textbook users (15.9%, p = 0.304). About 92.3% of TS users reported that TS represents a useful training tool, and 61.5% reported that it would be a good or very good required part of the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: TS is a useful tool to improve both technical skills and knowledge of tendon repair procedure steps; however, its role may be limited to a supplemental tool as it does not improve the theoretical knowledge. TS has the potential to be implemented in a surgical academic curriculum in low- and middle-income countries.
Keywords:
LMIC; Medical Knowledge; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Touch Surgery; low- and middle-income country; simulation; surgery training; surgical education
Authors: Anip Joshi; Bernardo Borraez-Segura; Mariyah Anwer; Oluwaseun Ladipo-Ajayi; Francisco Schlottmann; Diem Nguyen Ngoc Le; Andrew G Hill; Michael G Sarr Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Shujie Deng; Gavin Wheeler; Nicolas Toussaint; Lindsay Munroe; Suryava Bhattacharya; Gina Sajith; Ei Lin; Eeshar Singh; Ka Yee Kelly Chu; Saleha Kabir; Kuberan Pushparajah; John M Simpson; Julia A Schnabel; Alberto Gomez Journal: J Imaging Date: 2021-08-19
Authors: Patrick Haubruck; Felix Nickel; Julian Ober; Tilman Walker; Christian Bergdolt; Mirco Friedrich; Beat Peter Müller-Stich; Franziska Forchheim; Christian Fischer; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Michael C Tanner Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: G V Souza; A C V Hespanha; B F Paz; M A R Sá; R K Carneiro; S A M Guaita; T V Magalhães; B W Minto; L G G G Dias Journal: Vet Anim Sci Date: 2020-12-14
Authors: Matthew J J Anderson; Alirio J deMeireles; David P Trofa; David Kovacevic; Christopher S Ahmad; Thomas S Lynch Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Date: 2021-03-10
Authors: Shehnaz Alidina; Pritha Chatterjee; Noor Zanial; Sakshie Sanjay Alreja; Rebecca Balira; David Barash; Edwin Ernest; Geofrey Charles Giiti; Erastus Maina; Adelina Mazhiqi; Rahma Mushi; Cheri Reynolds; Meaghan Sydlowski; Florian Tinuga; Sarah Maongezi; John G Meara; Ntuli A Kapologwe; Erin Barringer; Monica Cainer; Isabelle Citron; Amanda DiMeo; Laura Fitzgerald; Hiba Ghandour; Magdalena Gruendl; Augustino Hellar; Desmond T Jumbam; Adam Katoto; Lauren Kelly; Steve Kisakye; Salome Kuchukhidze; Tenzing N Lama; Gopal Menon; Stella Mshana; Chase Reynolds; Hannington Segirinya; Dorcas Simba; Victoria Smith; Steven J Staffa; Christopher Strader; Leopold Tibyehabwa; Alena Troxel; John Varallo; Taylor Wurdeman; David Zurakowski Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 7.035