Literature DB >> 34345584

Emerging simulation technologies in global craniofacial surgical training.

Divya Mehrotra1, A F Markus2.   

Abstract

The last few decades have seen an exponential growth in the development and adoption of novel technologies in medical and surgical training of residents globally. Simulation is an active and innovative teaching method, and can be achieved via physical or digital models. Simulation allows the learners to repeatedly practice without the risk of causing any error in an actual patient and enhance their surgical skills and efficiency. Simulation may also allow the clinical instructor to objectively test the ability of the trainee to carry out the clinical procedure competently and independently prior to trainee's completion of the program. This review aims to explore the role of emerging simulation technologies globally in craniofacial training of students and residents in improving their surgical knowledge and skills. These technologies include 3D printed biomodels, virtual and augmented reality, use of google glass, hololens and haptic feedback, surgical boot camps, serious games and escape games and how they can be implemented in low and middle income countries. Craniofacial surgical training methods will probably go through a sea change in the coming years, with the integration of these new technologies in the surgical curriculum, allowing learning in a safe environment with a virtual patient, through repeated exercise. In future, it may also be used as an assessment tool to perform any specific procedure, without putting the actual patient on risk. Although these new technologies are being enthusiastically welcomed by the young surgeons, they should only be used as an addition to the actual curriculum and not as a replacement to the conventional tools, as the mentor-mentee relationship can never be replaced by any technology.
© 2021 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D models; Augmented reality; Craniofacial training; Escape game; Google glass; Hololens; Serious games; Virtual reality

Year:  2021        PMID: 34345584      PMCID: PMC8319526          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  123 in total

1.  Development of synthetic simulators for endoscope-assisted repair of metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Kyle W Eastwood; Vivek P Bodani; Faizal A Haji; Thomas Looi; Hani E Naguib; James M Drake
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Interactive iPhone/iPad App for Increased Tympanic Membrane Familiarity.

Authors:  Sheena Samra; Andrew Wu; Miriam Redleaf
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Development of a virtual reality training system for endoscope-assisted submandibular gland removal.

Authors:  Takehiro Miki; Toshinori Iwai; Kazunori Kotani; Jianwu Dang; Hideyuki Sawada; Minoru Miyake
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Surgical Boot Camps Increases Confidence for Residents Transitioning to Senior Responsibilities.

Authors:  Grace S Lee-Riddle; David F Sigmon; Andrew D Newton; Rachel R Kelz; Kristoffel R Dumon; Jon B Morris
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Immersion and haptic feedback impacts on dental anesthesia technical skills virtual reality training.

Authors:  Elen Collaço; Elisabeti Kira; Lucas H Sallaberry; Anna C M Queiroz; Maria A A M Machado; Oswaldo Crivello; Romero Tori
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  DIVA, a 3D virtual reality platform, improves undergraduate craniofacial trauma education.

Authors:  Jebrane Bouaoud; Mohamed El Beheiry; Eve Jablon; Thomas Schouman; Chloé Bertolus; Arnaud Picard; Jean-Baptiste Masson; Roman H Khonsari
Journal:  J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 1.569

7.  3D-printed patient individualised models vs cadaveric models in an undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery curriculum: Comparison of student's perceptions.

Authors:  Lukas B Seifert; Benedikt Schnurr; Carlos Herrera-Vizcaino; Amira Begic; Florian Thieringer; Frank Schwarz; Robert Sader
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.355

Review 8.  A review on the applications of virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality in surgical simulation: an extension to different kinds of surgery.

Authors:  Abel J Lungu; Wout Swinkels; Luc Claesen; Puxun Tu; Jan Egger; Xiaojun Chen
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.166

9.  Mastering Surgical Skills Through Simulation-Based Learning: Practice Makes One Perfect.

Authors:  Niti Khunger; Sushruta Kathuria
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  The Effect of Haptic Feedback on Efficiency and Safety During Preretinal Membrane Peeling Simulation.

Authors:  Anibal Francone; Jason Mingyi Huang; Ji Ma; Tsu-Chin Tsao; Jacob Rosen; Jean-Pierre Hubschman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.283

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-Sectional Study on the Comparative Assessment of Mandibular Anesthesia (Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blockage) Manual Skills Shaping among Dentists on Plastic and Biomaterial Models.

Authors:  Yuriy Vasil'ev; Ekaterina Diachkova; Hadi Darawsheh; Artem Kashtanov; Ekaterina Molotok; Beatrice Volel; Artem Batov; Olesya Kytko; Rinat Saleev; Gulshat Saleeva; Laysan Saleeva; Irina Smilyk; Natalya Tiunova
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.