| Literature DB >> 28708828 |
Bethany Levick1, Anne Laudisoit1,2,3, Floribert Tepage4, Chellafe Ensoy-Musoro5, Michel Mandro6, Caroline Bonareri Osoro5,7, Patrick Suykerbuyk3, Jean Marie Kashama8, Michel Komba9, Alliance Tagoto10, Dadi Falay11, Michael Begon1, Robert Colebunders3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increased prevalence of epilepsy has been reported in many onchocerciasis endemic areas. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of epilepsy in onchocerciasis endemic areas in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and investigate whether a higher annual intake of Ivermectin was associated with a lower prevalence of epilepsy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLEEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28708828 PMCID: PMC5529017 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Location of the study sites in the former Oriental Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Fig 2Histograms showing the distribution of ages in persons without (left) and with epilepsy (right).
Age-specific prevalence rates of epilepsy.
| Age (years) | Population | Number of patients with epilepsy | Epilepsy prevalence (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2411 | 12 | 0.5% | |
| 1421 | 47 | 3.3% | |
| 1600 | 105 | 6.6% | |
| 2665 | 205 | 7.7% | |
| 4269 | 37 | 0.9% | |
| 12,366 | 406 | 3.3% |
*42 individuals (of which one with epilepsy) had no age recorded and so are excluded.
Fig 3Histogram of age of epilepsy onset.
Prevalence rates of epilepsy, onchocerciasis (O.v.) endemicity, years of Ivermectin distribution and Ivermectin coverage in the surveyed health areas of Bas-Uele, Tshopo and Ituri Provinces.
| Province | Health Zone | Health Area | Population Surveyed | Epilepsy prevalence | Epilepsy of recent onset | Years of Ivermectin | Ivermectin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ituri | Logo | Draju | 1062 | 66 (6.2%) | 6 (1.0%) | 17/52 (32%) | 5 (0.5%) | 0 | 0% |
| Rethy | Rassia | 898 | 32 (3.6%) | 3 (0.3%) | 15/49 (30.6%) | 2 (0.2%) | 3 | 649/739 (87.8%) | |
| Lokpa | 843 | 31 (3.7%) | 3 (0.4%) | 5/50 (10%) | 0.0% | 3 | 524/718 (73.0%) | ||
| Tshopo | Yahuma | Mombongo | 1260 | 26 (2.1%) | 2 (0.2%) | 57% | 1 (0.1%) | 10 | 312/945 (33.0%) |
| Tshopo | Makutano Pumuzikia | 203 | 15 (7.4%) | 2 (1.0%) | 94% | 4 (2.0%) | 9 | 26/148 (17.6%) | |
| Yaleko | Yatange | 424 | 11 (2.6%) | 1 (0.2%) | 67% | 17 (4.0%) | 4 | 12/342 (3.5%) | |
| Wanierukula (PK30-PK70) | Salambongo | 5657 | 147 (2.6%) | 9 (0.2%) | 8/43 (18.6%) | 104 (1.9%) | 10 | 601/4182 (14.4%) | |
| Makana | 1121 | 9 (0.8%) | 0% | 55% | 5 (0.4%) | 10 | 112/826 (13.6%) | ||
| Bas-Uele | Aketi | Wela | 570 | 39 (6.8%) | 6 (1.1%) | 98% | 55 (9.6%) | 13 | 298/458 (65.1%) |
| Makoko | 367 | 31 (8.4%) | 5 (1.4%) | 98% | 12 (3.3%) | 13 | 217/278 (78.1%) |
1) Onset of seizures in the last 12 months
2) REMO data in September 2015 by our research team
*data obtained from the PLNO
3) RAPLOA, 2005.
4) RAPLOA, 2003
5) REMO, 1999 [13]
6) Only Leopard type of skin lesions were considered as O.v. skin lesions.
7) Number of individuals who reported to have taken Ivermectin in 2014/individual eligible to receive Ivermectin (%).
Health zone and area distribution of case control sample.
| Health Area | Number of case control pairs from this health area |
|---|---|
| Rassia | 4 |
| Lokpa | 5 |
| Mombongo | 4 |
| Salambongo | 35 |
| Makana | 4 |
| Wela | 21 |
| Makoko | 14 |
| Yatange | 2 |
| Makutano Pumuzikia | 7 |
| Total number of pairs | 96 |
Case control study: Ivermectin history according to epilepsy status, in health area, age and gender matched case and control study univariate analysis, with a random effect for pair identity.
| Factor | Odds Ratio | 95% C.I. | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivermectin received the year before epilepsy appeared (equivalent year in the controls) | 0.52 | 0.28, 0.98 | 0.04 |
| Proportion of occasions, in years eligible, Ivermectin received before epilepsy appearance (or equivalent period in controls) | 0.46 | 0.22, 0.95 | 0.04 |
| Proportion of occasions, in years eligible, Ivermectin received after epilepsy appearance (or equivalent period in controls) | 0.89 | 0.46, 1.70 | 0.71 |
Multivariate regression analysis of individual risk factors for epilepsy.
| Fixed effects | Population in sample | No. of patients with epilepsy | Epilepsy prevalence | OR | (95%CI) | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Ivermectin doses received | 2.04 | 1.21, 3.42 | <0.01 | ||||
| Onchocerciasis associated skin lesions (leopard skin) | Present | 205 | 18 | 8.78% | 4.57 | 2.34, 8.57 | <0.001 |
| Absent | 12,131 | 388 | 0.32% | ||||
| Interaction between proportion of Ivermectin doses received and presence of Onchocerciasis associated skin lesions (leopard skin) | 0.08 | 0.003, 0.79 | 0.04 | ||||
| Age | 0.99 | 0.98, 0.99 | <0.001 | ||||
| Gender | Male | 6041 | 221 | 3.66% | 1.27 | 1.03, 1.56 | 0.01 |
| Female | 6304 | 186 | 2.95% | ||||
| Health area random effect | 0.31 | ||||||
| Patient random effect | 0.54 |
1) Variance between random by-health area effect
2) Variance between random patient effect
Fig 4Plot of the 2 most likely clusters of epilepsy cases for each province, based on Kulldorff’s scan statistics.
Each blue circle (seen here as overlapping due to close proximity) represents one household, regardless of the epilepsy status.