| Literature DB >> 34033255 |
Rodney Ogwang1,2,3, Dennis Muhanguzi4, Kioko Mwikali3, Ronald Anguzu2,5, Joe Kubofcik6, Thomas B Nutman6, Mark Taylor7, Charles R Newton3,8, Angela Vincent9, Andrea L Conroy10, Kevin Marsh11, Richard Idro1,2,11.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Nodding syndrome is a poorly understood epileptic encephalopathy characterized by a unique seizure type-head nodding-and associated with Onchocerca volvulus infection. We hypothesized that altered immune activation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma of children with nodding syndrome may yield insights into the pathophysiology and progression of this seizure disorder.Entities:
Keywords: Epilepsy; Northern Uganda; chemokine; cytokine; neuroinflammation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34033255 PMCID: PMC8166803 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsia Open ISSN: 2470-9239
FIGURE 1Study area in northern Uganda
Study participant demographics and infections
| Variable | Nodding syndrome (n=154) |
Community controls (n=154) | CSF controls (n=15) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||
| Age, years, mean (SD) | 15.5 (1.7) | 14.6 (2.1) | 12.3 (1.5) | <.0001 |
| Male, % (n/N) | 55.2% (85/154) | 54.5% (84/154) | 46.7% (7/15) | .81 |
| Height‐for‐age z scores, median (IQR) | ‐1.11 (1.81‐0.36) | ‐0.8 (‐1.62‐0.01) | NA | .01 |
| Severe stunting, % (n/N) (z score<‐3) | 5.8% (9/154) | 3.9% (6/154) | NA | .59 |
| BMI‐for‐age z scores mean (SD) | ‐2.02 (1.47) | 1.65 (1.15) | NA | .01 |
| Severe wasting, % (n/N) (z score<‐3) | 22.7% (35/154) | 11% (17/154) | NA | .009 |
| MUAC, cm, mean (SD) | 22.16 (3.33) | 21.76 (2.84) | NA | .26 |
| Infection | ||||
| Malaria smear positive, % (n/N) | 72.7% (112/154) | 54.5% (84/154) | 0% (0/15) | <.0001 |
| HIV infection, % (n/N) | 0.6% (1/154) | 0% (0/154) | 0% (0/154) | .14 |
| Seropositive OV‐16, % (n/N) | 95.4% (147/154) | 55.2% (86/154) | NA | <.0001 |
| Active | 8.4% (13/154) | 1.3% (2/154) | NA | .006 |
Abbreviation: NA, data not available/applicable.
ANOVA.
Chi‐square test.
Mann‐Whitney U test.
Unpaired Student’s t test.
FIGURE 2Plasma markers of immune activation in nodding syndrome and community controls. Box plots showing plasma levels of markers of immune activation in cases with nodding syndrome (nodding syndrome, n = 154, red) and healthy community controls (HC, n = 154, blue). Box plots represent median and IQR with whiskers denoting the 5% and 95% percentile data compared using the Mann‐Whitney U test, where *P ≤ .01, **P ≤ .001, ***P ≤ .0001, and ****P ≤ .00001. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, IL‐10, April, RANTES, CCL2, CXCL13, MMP‐9, and OV‐16 remained significant
FIGURE 3Cerebral spinal fluid inflammatory markers in patients with nodding syndrome. Box plots showing CSF levels of markers of immune activation in cases of nodding syndrome (NS, n = 154, red) compared with CSF controls (CC, n = 15, blue). Box plots represent median and IQR with whiskers denoting the 5% and 95% percentiles data compared using the Mann‐Whitney U test, where *P ≤ .01, **P ≤ .001, ***P ≤ .0001, and ****P ≤ .00001. After adjusting for multiple for multiple comparisons, only C5/C5a remained significant
Table comparing markers of immune activation in nodding syndrome case with mild, moderate, and severe disease
| Marker | Plasma | CSF | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild disease (n = 31) |
Moderate disease (n = 34) |
Severe disease (n = 89) |
|
Mild disease (n = 31) | Moderate disease (n = 34) |
Severe disease (n = 89) |
| |
| Immune activation | ||||||||
| CXCL10, pg/mL | 68.32 (50.59, 121.2) | 64.85 (44.25, 86.81) | 71.47 (43.5, 106.7) | .84 | 112.0 (64.4, 172.70) | 103.6 (78.96, 214.7) | 82.22 (55.06, 143.6) | .08 |
| CCL2, pg/mL | 38.28 (22.01, 63.76) | 37.72 (21.24, 80.45) | 34.56 (21.24, 63.76) | .42 | 256.3 (221.1, 396.1) | 244.2 (176.1, 459.4) | 237.5 (166.9, 390.7) | .36 |
| CXCL13, pg/mL | 44.73 (24.31, 70.09) | 47.31 (25.29, 87.5) | 34.8 (25.13, 66.83 | .73 | 18.96 (15.43, 24.36) | 18.96 (15.43, 23.5) | 18.96 (14.48, 22.64) | .50 |
| CXCL9, pg/mL | 399.7 (399.7, 878.5) | 399.7 (399.7, 923.3) | 399.7 (399.7, 619.5) | .32 | ND | ND | ND | ‐ |
| CCL5(RANTES) ng/mL | 2.13 (1.94, 2.59) | 2.19 (1.80, 2.62) | 2.24 (1.60, 2.82) | .88 | ND | ND | ND | ‐ |
| IL‐10, pg/mL | 38.18 (29.8, 59.98) | 41.25 (33.99, 56.33) | 38.18 (20.79, 58.77) | .14 | 29.17 (24.59, 33.14) | 26.89 (24.05, 38.65) | 29.17 (24.39, 38.35) | .19 |
| IL‐4, pg/mL | 2.42 (2.42, 4.93) | 2.42 (2.42, 4.63) | 2.42 (2.42, 9.87) | .21 | 11.27 (8.02, 13.68) | 11.38 (8.54, 13.64) | 9.65 (7.23, 12.17) | .99 |
| IL‐13, pg/mL | 245.2 (245.2, 554.2) | 245.2 (245.2, 554.2) | 245.2 (245.2, 357) | .36 | ND | ND | ND | ‐ |
| APRIL, pg/ml | 149.7 (97.65, 256.8) | 184 (110.7, 267.3) | 163.3 (91.48, 230.9) | .87 | 45.66 (32.64, 60.87) | 41.29 (26.45, 53.42) | 36.99 (26.43, 50.08) | .06 |
| BAFF, pg/mL | 664.0 (570.1, 891.9) | 643.8 (553.4, 852.9) | 647.5 (568.5, 769.5) | .71 | 73.65 (58.85, 96.54) | 63.41 (49.72, 92.05) | 59.58 (47.98, 85.4) | .07 |
| MMP‐9, ng/mL | 0.87 (0.65, 1.53) | 1.16 (0.74, 1.52) | 1.05 (0.71, 1.50) | .71 | ND | ND | ND | ‐ |
| Neopterin, mmol/L | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured | ‐ | 2.268 (1.23, 3.90) | 2.715 (0.95, 4) | 2.84(1.43, 4.0) | .53 |
| Complement activation | ||||||||
| C5/C5a, ng/mL | 18.06 (11.54, 29.87) | 23.45 (16.69, 31.51) | 16.89 (11.33 29.50) | .47 | 14.90 (9.53, 21.31) | 14.68 (8.73, 18.96) | 11.99 (7.79, 19.37) | .14 |
| CRP, mg/L | 4.11 (0.88 ‐ 8.26) | 5.58 (2.15, 22.48) | 7.71 (4.02, 17.59) | .008 | 0.0029 (0.001, 0.003) | 0.0024 (0.001, 0.003) | 0.00214 (0.0008, 0.003) | 0.33 |
Data presented as median (IQR) and analyzed using a nonparametric test for trend.
Abbreviations: April, A proliferation‐inducing ligand; BAFF, B lymphocyte stimulator; C5/C5a, complement component; CCL2, chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 2; CCL5 (RANTES), chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand 5 (regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted); CRP, C‐reactive protein; CSF, cerebral spinal fluid; CXCL10, C‐X‐C motif chemokine 10/ interferon gamma‐induced protein 10; CXCL13, chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 13; CXCL9, chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 9; IL‐10, interleukin‐10; IL‐13, interleukin‐13; IL‐4, interleukin‐4; MMP‐9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; ND, not detected.
FIGURE 4Forest plot depicting the relationship between plasma markers of inflammation in children with nodding syndrome and community children. Forest plots show odds ratio (95% CI) from a multivariable logistic regression model based on a one‐unit change in log 10‐transformed plasma biomarker with nodding syndrome cases as the dependent variable. (A) Model with all participants (NS = 154 and CC = 154). (B) Model in P falciparum–positive individuals (NS = 112, CC = 84). (C) Model in P falciparum–negative participants (NS = 42, CC = 70). Adjusted models included participant age, sex, BMI‐for‐age z score, O volvulus seropositivity, and P falciparum status (in combined model). Plasma markers upregulated in nodding syndrome are shown in red, markers with no change are shown in gray, and markers downregulated are depicted in blue. Markers significant following adjustment for multiple comparisons are indicated with an asterisk. Markers are ordered by odds ratio from highest to lowest within each plot