| Literature DB >> 27139245 |
Robert Colebunders1, Floribert Tepage2, Ente Rood3, Michel Mandro4, Emmanuel Nji Abatih5, Gisele Musinya6, Germain Mambandu7, José Kabeya7, Michel Komba8, Bethany Levick9, John L Mokili10, Anne Laudisoit1,9,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An increased prevalence of epilepsy has been reported in many onchocerciasis endemic areas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27139245 PMCID: PMC4854481 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1General location of the study sites.
Fig 2From left to right: the age distribution of epileptics in Dingila, the year their epilepsy started, and their age upon first epilepsy seizure.
Fig 3From left to right: the age distribution of epileptics in Titule, the year their epilepsy started, and their age upon first epilepsy seizure.
Age-specific prevalence rates of epilepsy in Titule, Bas-Uélé District, Northern Congo.
| Age (years) | Population of Household sample | N° of patients with epilepsy | Epilepsy prevalence (%) | For comparison: Age-specific rates from Western Uganda, 1994[ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 507 | 8 | 1.6 | ||
| 315 | 6 | 1.9 | ||
| 435 | 17 | 4.0 | ||
| 701 | 33 | 4.7 | ||
| 948 | 3 | 0.3 | ||
| 2906 | 67 | 2.3 |
Fig 4Overview of study area (a) and Titule village (b) showing the point locations and smooth kernel density estimation (300 m radius) of epilepsy in the area as well as the location of roads and rivers.
Fig 5Plot showing the correlation between household prevalence rates as a function of distance (Moran’s I statistic of spatial autocorrelation).
Spatial autocorrelation was calculated by incremental distance intervals of 50 meters starting at 200 meters.
Multivariate regression analysis of individual risk factors for epilepsy in Titule village Bas-Uélé District, Northern Congo.
| Fixed effects: | Population in sample | No of patients with epilepsy | Epilepsy prevalence | OR | (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2874 | 66 | 2.3% | 0.002 | (0–0.006)*** | |
| No | 1594 | 48 | 3.0% | - | - |
| Yes | 1280 | 18 | 1.4% | 33.3 | (0.12–0.44)*** |
| 0–9 | 940 | 3 | 0.3% | 1.33 | - |
| 10–19 | 693 | 33 | 4.7% | 0.63 | (9.8–113.2)*** |
| > 20 | 1241 | 30 | 2.4% | 0.002 | (3.44–39.1)*** |
| Female | 1508 | 35 | 2.3% | - | - |
| Male | 1366 | 31 | 2.3% | 33.3 | (0.79–2.3)ns |
| 0.63 | (0.45–0.91)* | ||||
| 1.34 |
1 Model intercept representing the baseline odds of epilepsy within the reference category at zero distance to a nearest river
2 River distances were centered on the mean (204 m) and scaled to the standard deviation (132 m).
3 Variance between random by-household intercept
4 p< 0.05 = *, p <0.01 = **, p <0.001 = ***, ns = not significant