| Literature DB >> 27210267 |
Robert Colebunders1, Michel Mandro2, John L Mokili3, Gisele Mucinya4, Germain Mambandu5, Kenneth Pfarr6, Ingrid Reiter-Owona6, Achim Hoerauf6, Floribert Tepage7, Bethanie Levick8, Michael Begon8, Anne Laudisoit9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reason for the high prevalence of epilepsy in onchocerciasis endemic areas remains unknown. The aim of this study was to detect risk factors associated with epilepsy in a region endemic for onchocerciasis.Entities:
Keywords: Case-control study; Democratic Republic of the Congo; Epilepsy; Nodding syndrome; Onchocerciasis; Risk factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27210267 PMCID: PMC4973807 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2016.05.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Infect Dis ISSN: 1201-9712 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Location of Titule in the Bas-Uele district, Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Figure 2Histograms showing age distribution of cases and controls.
Clinical characteristics of cases and controls
| Clinical characteristics | Cases ( | Controls ( | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg), mean (SD) | 38.9 (11.21) | 46.7 (15.27) | <0.001 | |
| Height (cm), mean (SD) | 148.4 (15.03) | 154.0 (17.8) | <0.001 | |
| BMI (kg/m | 17.83 (2.86) | 18.43 (2.69) | 0.001 | |
| Itching | 65% (26/40) | 16% (8/51) | 13.31 (4.34–40.8) | <0.01 |
| Onchocerciasis suspected skin lesions | 29% (12/41) | 2% (1/56) | 20.26 (2.42–170) | <0.01 |
| Abnormal vision | 8% (4/52) | 0% (0/52) | - | - |
| Blindness | 2% (1/59) | 0% (0/61) | - | - |
| Nodules | 8% (3/40) | 4% (2/46) | 1.13 (0.14–9.3) | 0.9 |
| Burn scars | 18% (10/57) | 0% (0/61) | - | <0.01 |
| History of febrile convulsions | 21% (12/56) | 3% (2/61) | 8.23 (1.74–38.8) | <0.01 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
Age-adjusted linear regression model.
Age-adjusted binomial logistic regression model.
OR not calculated due to null value in one or more classes.
Potential risk factors associated with epilepsya
| Factor | Cases | Controls | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact with insects | ||||
| Contact with | 96% (55/57) | 98% (60/61) | 0.46 (0.04–5.20) | 0.5 |
| Contact with | 71% (41/57) | 86% (53/61) | 0.39 (0.15–1.00) | 0.05 |
| Contact with | 82% (47/57) | 72% (44/61) | 1.84 (0.15–1.00) | 0.18 |
| Contact with tsetse | 19% (11/57) | 21% (13/61) | 0.88 (0.36–2.19) | 0.80 |
| Eating insects | 75% (43/57) | 98% (59/60) | 0.05 (0.01–0.42) | <0.01 |
| Eating larvae | 82% (47/57) | 100% (60/60) | 0.00 (0.00–Inf) | 0.99 |
| Contact with domestic animals | ||||
| Cat | 4/57 (7%) | 5/41 (12%) | 0.55 (0.14–2.20) | 0.4 |
| Dog | 4/57 (7%) | 2/41 (5%) | 1.48 (0.26–8.52) | 0.7 |
| Chicken | 21/57 (37%) | 24/41 (59%) | 0.42 (0.18–0.95) | 0.04 |
| Cow | 0/57 (0%) | 2/41 (5%) | - | 0.17c |
| Pig | 0/57 (0%) | 4/41 (10%) | - | 0.03c |
| Goat | 6/57 (11%) | 13/41 (32) | 0.25 (0.09–0.73) | 0.01 |
| Contact with rivers | ||||
| Bathing: never (reference value) | 33% (17/51) | 40% (22/55) | ||
| Bathing: less than daily | 20% (10/51) | 38% (21/55) | 0.62 (0.23–1.65) | 0.34 |
| Bathing: daily | 47% (24/51) | 22% (12/55) | 2.59 (1.01–6.62) | 0.05 |
| Washing clothes: never (reference value) | 25% (13/55) | 22% (12/55) | ||
| Washing clothes: less than daily | 62% (34/55) | 76% (42/55) | 0.75 (0.3–1.85) | 0.53 |
| Washing clothes: daily | 15% (8/55) | 2% (1/55) | 7.31 (0.8–68.1) | 0.08 |
| Bathing 5 a.m.–10 a.m. | 40% (23/58) | 22% (13/58) | 2.25 (0.98–5.01) | 0.06 |
| Bathing 11 a.m.–4 p.m. | 58% (34/58) | 28% (16/58) | 3.86 (1.76–8.47) | <0.01 |
| Bathing 5 p.m.–10 p.m. | 36% (21/58) | 36% (21/58) | 0.94 (0.44–2.04) | 0.90 |
| Washing clothes 5 a.m.–10 a.m. | 38% (21/56) | 52% (29/56) | 0.55 (0.26–1.17) | 0.12 |
| Washing clothes 11 a.m.–4 p.m. | 63% (35/56) | 38% (21/56) | 2.71 (1.24–5.89) | 0.01 |
| Washing clothes 5 p.m.–10 p.m. | 23% (13/56) | 13% (7/56) | 2.01 (0.73–5.58) | 0.18 |
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
ORs and p-values estimated from age-adjusted univariate binomial logistic regression, except for those labelled ‘c’, where a Fisher's exact test was performed due to null values in one of the groups. In the case of bathing and washing times, the comparison is with those who bathed or washed but at other times.
OR not computed as there were no records in the case group.
Age-adjusted multivariate binomial logistic regression analysis of contact with the river as a potential risk factor for epilepsy
| Factor | Cases | Controls | aOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bathing daily (reference less than daily) | 47% (24/51) | 22% (12/55) | 16.33 (1.99–134.2) | 0.009 |
| Washing clothes daily (reference less than daily) | 15% (8/55) | 2% (1/55) | 1.07 (0.07–16.6) | 0.96 |
| Bathing 5 a.m.–10 a.m. | 40% (23/58) | 22% (13/58) | 3.28 (0.49–22.1) | 0.22 |
| Bathing 11 a.m.–4 p.m. | 58% (34/58) | 28% (16/58) | 22.65 (1.77–289.3) | 0.016 |
| Washing clothes 5 a.m.–10 a.m. | 38% (21/56) | 52% (29/56) | 1.67 (0.27–10.5) | 0.58 |
| Washing clothes 11 a.m.–4 p.m. | 63% (35/56) | 38% (21/56) | 9.78 (0.93–103.1) | 0.058 |
aOR, age-adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3Percentage of patients who were eligible to receive Ivermectin, that were recorded to have taken it in each year 2000-2013. This is shown for all patients (left) and only for patients with documented OV infestation (right).
Laboratory test results for cases and controls
| Test | Cases | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skin OV PCR-positive | 26/34 (76%) | 10/14 (71%) | 0.7 |
| OV IgG4 antibodies | 39/49 (78%) | 15/18 (83%) | 0.5 |
| 12/49 (78%) | 13/20 (65%) | 0.91 | |
| 5% (1/20) | 4% (1/26) | 0.9 |
OV, Onchocerca volvulus.