Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy1, Reinoud Knops2, Brett Atwater3, Petr Neuzil4, John Ip5, Elkin Gonzalez6, Paul Friedman7, Pascal Defaye8, Derek Exner9, Kazutaka Aonuma10, Rahul Doshi11, Johannes Sperzel12, Vivek Reddy13. 1. Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas. Electronic address: dlakkireddy@kumc.edu. 2. Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. 5. Sparrow Clinical Research Institute, Lansing, Michigan. 6. Hospital Universitario de la Paz, Madrid, Spain. 7. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 8. CHRU Albert Michallon, Grenoble, France. 9. Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, Canada. 10. University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan. 11. USC University Hospital, Los Angeles, California. 12. Kerckhoff Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany. 13. Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Nanostim leadless pacemaker (LP) met the primary endpoints in an investigational device exemption trial, and was shown to be fully retrievable percutaneously. In October 2016, St Jude Medical issued a worldwide alert of a battery malfunction that caused lost pacing output and LP communication. OBJECTIVE: To report the battery failure mechanism and incidence and the worldwide patient management, including device retrieval experiences. METHODS: The affected LP battery is a custom lithium-carbon monofluoride cell. These were returned after failure and underwent analysis assessing electronics and battery performance. Data were collected in ongoing clinical studies when LPs were abandoned or retrieved. RESULTS: Of 1423 LPs implanted worldwide, there were 34 battery failures, occurring at 2.9 ± 0.4 years with no instances of associated patient injury. Analysis of returned batteries revealed an increase in battery resistance caused by insufficient electrolyte availability at the cathode/anode interface. A total of 66 of 73 retrieval attempts were successful (90.4%; implant duration range: 0.2-4.0 years). The LP docking button was inaccessible in 6 patients, and the docking button detached from the LP during retrieval in 1 patient. There was 1 case of arteriovenous fistula and another case of the LP docking button migrating into the pulmonary artery. There were also 115 non-LP retrieval patients after the advisory who received an additional pacemaker, with no adverse device-to-device interactions reported. CONCLUSION: As with standard pacers, LPs can have critical battery failures. Chronic retrieval of LPs is safe and efficacious.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Nanostim leadless pacemaker (LP) met the primary endpoints in an investigational device exemption trial, and was shown to be fully retrievable percutaneously. In October 2016, St Jude Medical issued a worldwide alert of a battery malfunction that caused lost pacing output and LP communication. OBJECTIVE: To report the battery failure mechanism and incidence and the worldwide patient management, including device retrieval experiences. METHODS: The affected LP battery is a custom lithium-carbon monofluoride cell. These were returned after failure and underwent analysis assessing electronics and battery performance. Data were collected in ongoing clinical studies when LPs were abandoned or retrieved. RESULTS: Of 1423 LPs implanted worldwide, there were 34 battery failures, occurring at 2.9 ± 0.4 years with no instances of associated patient injury. Analysis of returned batteries revealed an increase in battery resistance caused by insufficient electrolyte availability at the cathode/anode interface. A total of 66 of 73 retrieval attempts were successful (90.4%; implant duration range: 0.2-4.0 years). The LP docking button was inaccessible in 6 patients, and the docking button detached from the LP during retrieval in 1 patient. There was 1 case of arteriovenous fistula and another case of the LP docking button migrating into the pulmonary artery. There were also 115 non-LP retrieval patients after the advisory who received an additional pacemaker, with no adverse device-to-device interactions reported. CONCLUSION: As with standard pacers, LPs can have critical battery failures. Chronic retrieval of LPs is safe and efficacious.
Authors: Roshini S Asirvatham; Vaibhav R Vaidya; Trena M Thome; Paul A Friedman; Yong-Mei Cha Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 1.900