PURPOSE: We aimed to perform intraindividual comparison of computed tomography (CT) parameters, image quality, and radiation exposure between standard CT angiography (CTA) and high-pitch dual source (DS)-CTA, in subjects undergoing serial CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with thoracoabdominal CTA by standard technique and high-pitch DS-CTA technique within 6 months of each other were retrieved for intraindividual comparison of image quality in thoracic and abdominal aorta. Quantitative analysis was performed by comparison of mean aortic attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed by visual assessment of motion artifacts and diagnostic confidence. Radiation exposure was quantified by effective dose. Image quality was apportioned to radiation exposure by means of figure of merit. RESULTS: Mean aortic attenuation and noise were higher in high-pitch DS-CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta, whereas SNR and CNR were similar in thoracic aorta and significantly lower in high-pitch DS-CTA of abdominal aorta (P = 0.024 and P = 0.016). High-pitch DS-CTA was significantly better in the first segment of thoracic aorta. Effective dose was reduced by 72% in high-pitch DS-CTA. CONCLUSION: High-pitch DS-CTA without electrocardiography-gating is an effective technique for imaging aorta with very low radiation exposure and with significant reduction of motion artifacts in ascending aorta; however, the overall quality of high-pitch DS-CTA in abdominal aorta is lower than standard CTA.
PURPOSE: We aimed to perform intraindividual comparison of computed tomography (CT) parameters, image quality, and radiation exposure between standard CT angiography (CTA) and high-pitch dual source (DS)-CTA, in subjects undergoing serial CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta. METHODS: Eighteen subjects with thoracoabdominal CTA by standard technique and high-pitch DS-CTA technique within 6 months of each other were retrieved for intraindividual comparison of image quality in thoracic and abdominal aorta. Quantitative analysis was performed by comparison of mean aortic attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed by visual assessment of motion artifacts and diagnostic confidence. Radiation exposure was quantified by effective dose. Image quality was apportioned to radiation exposure by means of figure of merit. RESULTS: Mean aortic attenuation and noise were higher in high-pitch DS-CTA of thoracoabdominal aorta, whereas SNR and CNR were similar in thoracic aorta and significantly lower in high-pitch DS-CTA of abdominal aorta (P = 0.024 and P = 0.016). High-pitch DS-CTA was significantly better in the first segment of thoracic aorta. Effective dose was reduced by 72% in high-pitch DS-CTA. CONCLUSION: High-pitch DS-CTA without electrocardiography-gating is an effective technique for imaging aorta with very low radiation exposure and with significant reduction of motion artifacts in ascending aorta; however, the overall quality of high-pitch DS-CTA in abdominal aorta is lower than standard CTA.
Authors: Long Jiang Zhang; Xie Li; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Chun Xiang Tang; Chang Sheng Zhou; Guang Ming Lu Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: W Wuest; K Anders; A Schuhbaeck; M S May; S Gauss; M Marwan; M Arnold; S Ensminger; G Muschiol; W G Daniel; M Uder; S Achenbach Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jared D Christensen; Danielle M Seaman; Matthew P Lungren; Lynne M Hurwitz; Daniel T Boll Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Achille Mileto; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; Rendon C Nelson; Lynne M Hurwitz; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Danielle M Seaman; Daniele Marin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Dushyant Sahani; Sanjay Saini; Roy V D'Souza; Mary Jane O'Neill; Srinivasa R Prasad; Mannudeep K Kalra; Elkan F Halpern; Peter Mueller Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Lucas L Geyer; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; Justin R Silverman; Aleksander W Krazinski; Fabian Bamberg; Daniel H Steinberg Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Bernhard Bischoff; Felix G Meinel; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Christoph Becker Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-01-19 Impact factor: 2.357