Literature DB >> 28701877

Endophytic fungi harbored in Panax notoginseng: diversity and potential as biological control agents against host plant pathogens of root-rot disease.

You-Kun Zheng1, Cui-Ping Miao1, Hua-Hong Chen2, Fang-Fang Huang1, Yu-Mei Xia1, You-Wei Chen1, Li-Xing Zhao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endophytic fungi play an important role in balancing the ecosystem and boosting host growth. In the present study, we investigated the endophytic fungal diversity of healthy Panax notoginseng and evaluated its potential antimicrobial activity against five major phytopathogens causing root-rot of P. notoginseng.
METHODS: A culture-dependent technique, combining morphological and molecular methods, was used to analyze endophytic fungal diversity. A double-layer agar technique was used to challenge the phytopathogens of P. notoginseng.
RESULTS: A total of 89 fungi were obtained from the roots, stems, leaves, and seeds of P. notoginseng, and 41 isolates representing different morphotypes were selected for taxonomic characterization. The fungal isolates belonged to Ascomycota (96.6%) and Zygomycota (3.4%). All isolates were classified to 23 genera and an unknown taxon belonging to Sordariomycetes. The number of isolates obtained from different tissues ranged from 12 to 42 for leaves and roots, respectively. The selected endophytic fungal isolates were challenged by the root-rot pathogens Alternaria panax, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Phoma herbarum, and Mycocentrospora acerina. Twenty-six of the 41 isolates (63.4%) exhibited activity against at least one of the pathogens tested.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that P. notoginseng harbors diversified endophytic fungi that would provide a basis for the identification of new bioactive compounds, and for effective biocontrol of notoginseng root rot.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Panax notoginseng; biological control; endophytic fungi; fungal diversity; root-rot disease

Year:  2016        PMID: 28701877      PMCID: PMC5489767          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ginseng Res        ISSN: 1226-8453            Impact factor:   6.060


Introduction

Panax notoginseng (Burkill) F.H. Chen (Araliaceae) is a perennial herbaceous plant, cultivated mainly in Wenshan, Yunnan, China, and has been historically used as both a medicinal herb and food. Rhizome and roots of P. notoginseng are officially recorded as notoginseng in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [1]. About 61 Chinese patent medicines contain notoginseng, including Yunnan Bai Yao, a famous hemostatic proprietary herbal remedy. The secondary metabolites of this plant include saponins [2], [3], flavones [2], amino acids [4], and polysaccharides [5], with the most emphasis being on saponins. P. notoginseng saponins are considered as the major active ingredients in notoginseng. The saponins display multiple pharmacological effects, such as hemostatic [6], [7], [8], [9], antioxidant [10], [11], neuroprotective [12], [13], antitumor [14], [15], antidiabetic [16], [17], and other activities, and have been extensively used as therapeutic agents in China. The pronounced efficacies of notoginseng saponins have led to the development of several Chinese patent medicines, such as Xuesaitong Capsules/Soft Capsules [18] and Xuesaitong Injection [19]. In recent years, the demand for notoginseng has been increasing. Unfortunately, the yield and quality of notoginseng are severely limited by replanting obstacles [20], and a number of diseases caused by a plethora of phytopathogens [21]. Among the diseases, the root-rot disease complex is the most destructive one as it results in yield reduction, no harvest, or low content of active ingredients [22]. The reported fungal pathogens causing root rot include Alternaria panax, Alternaria tenuissima, Cylindrocarpon destructans, Cylindrocarpon didynum, Rhizoctonia solani, Phytophthora cactorum, Phoma herbarum, Fusarium solani, Fusarium oxysporum [21], and Fusarium flocciferum [23]. Although diverse chemical pesticides and some biocontrol methods are used, it is difficult to control the root-rot diseases because of the pathogenic complex. More comprehensive, practical, and ecological methods to eradicate the pathogenic diseases in P. notoginseng are urgently needed. Furthermore, specific and nonspecific fungi and bacteria associated with the plant have been found with little information about their ecological functions. Microbial communities associated with plants play an important role in balancing the ecosystem and boosting host growth. Endophytic fungi, which live in healthy plant tissues for at least a part of their life cycle, without causing any noticeable symptoms of infection or disease, may benefit their host in different ways, such as producing bioactive secondary metabolites, promoting germination and shoot growth, inducing host plants to tolerate to biotic or abiotic stresses [24], [25], [26], [27]. In a previous study, Ma et al [28] demonstrated high phylogenetic diversity and biocontrol potential of bacterial endophytes of P. notoginseng. However, little is known about the fungal community harbored in P. notoginseng. In this study, the diversity of endophytic fungi isolated from different tissues of healthy P. notoginseng was evaluated, and the isolates were screened for their potential antimicrobial activity against five major phytopathogens causing root rot of P. notoginseng. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the biodiversity, phylogeny, and assessment of biocontrol potential of endophytic fungi harbored in P. notoginseng.

Materials and methods

Isolation of endophytic fungi

Three-year-old healthy P. notoginseng plant samples were collected in October 2013, from a plantation in Wenshan, Yunnan, Southwest China. The collected plants were excised into roots, stems, leaves, and seeds, put into plastic bags, transferred to the laboratory within 24 h, and stored at 4°C until the isolation procedure of endophytic fungi was carried out. The surface sterilization and isolation of fungal endophytes were carried out by following the procedures described by Park et al [29]. The plant samples were washed thoroughly with running tap water to remove soil particles and rinsed six times with distilled water. The separated parts (roots, stems, leaves, and seeds; Fig. 1A) were immersed in 75% ethanol solution for 2–3 min, and subsequently transferred to 5.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 1–2 min, depending on the different tissues. The surface-sterilized samples were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water and dried with sterile filter paper. Sterile samples were aseptically crumbled into small fragments, evenly placed on Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) with 100 mg/L ampicillin to inhibit bacterial growth. The Petri dishes were incubated at 28 ± 1°C until fungal growth started. To confirm that the disinfection process was successful, a 0.1-mL aliquot of the water used for the last washing step was spotted on PDA plates supplemented with 100 mg/L ampicillin, and incubated under the same conditions in parallel. Plates that were not detected as contaminated by cultivable microorganisms were considered as successfully surface disinfected and used for isolation of endophytes [30]. The cultures were monitored every day to monitor the growth of endophytic fungi. Each colony that emerged from the fragments was transferred to antibiotic-free PDA medium (Fig. 1B), for subculture, and brought into pure culture.
Fig. 1

Panax notoginseng, endophytic fungi and bioactivities. (A) Different parts of 3-year-old healthy plant of P. notoginseng; (B) isolation of endophytic fungi; (C) fermentation; (D) screening of antagonistic endophytic fungi against host phytopathogens of root-rot disease.

Panax notoginseng, endophytic fungi and bioactivities. (A) Different parts of 3-year-old healthy plant of P. notoginseng; (B) isolation of endophytic fungi; (C) fermentation; (D) screening of antagonistic endophytic fungi against host phytopathogens of root-rot disease. The pure cultures were recorded and maintained on PDA in active form for further investigation. For long-term storage, the fungal colonies were stored in 15% (v/v) glycerol at −80°C. All the fungal isolates were deposited in the Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University, Kunming, China.

Fungal DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

The pure cultures were used for DNA extraction. DNA was extracted from 0.5–1.0 g mycelia chilled in liquid nitrogen by using the sodium dodecyl sulfatecetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide method [31]. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was amplified using primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [32]. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a 50-μL reaction mixture containing 1 μL template DNA, 1 μL forward primer (10μM), 1 μL reverse primer (10μM), 5 μL reaction buffer (10×), 4 μL dNTP (each 2.5μM), 0.5 μL Taq DNA Polymerase (5 U/μL), and 37.5 μL sterile double-distilled water. The PCR cycling protocol consisted of initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 2 min, and a final elongation step of 72°C for 10 min. As a negative control, the template DNA was replaced by sterile double-distilled water. The PCR amplified products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, and sequenced on an ABI Prism 3730 sequencer at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

Phylogenetic analysis of endophytic fungi

For strain identification, the ITS sequences were compared with those in the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using the BLAST search program for the final identification of the fungal endophytes program. A phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using MEGA version 5.0 software (http://www.megasoftware.net/), after pairwise alignments using the CLUSTAL X program, version 1.8 (http://www.clustal.org/) [33]. The stability of the internal branches was assessed with 1,000 bootstrap replications. The sequences of this study were deposited in the GenBank database under the accession numbers: KP714353–KP714393 (Table 1).
Table 1

Analysis of 89 isolates from Panax notoginseng with the related species and their isolation information

Phylogenetic group(genus)Representative isolate(accession No.)Closest species in GenBank(accession No.)Similarity (%)Tissues of P. notoginseng
No. of isolates
RootsStemsLeavesSeeds
ASCOMYCETES
Capnodiales
CladosporiumPH30450 (KP714353)Cladosporium cladosporioides (KJ767066 )10038
PH30409 (KP714354)Cladosporium oxysporum (KJ475816)1003
PH30412 (KP714355)Cladosporium oxysporum (KJ475816)1002
Chaetothyriales
PhialophoraPH30403 (KP714356)Phialophora mustea (KF850364)10011
Diaporthales
PhomopsisPH30406 (KP714357)Phomopsis columnaris (KC145883)10022
Eurotiales
AspergillusPH30427 (KP714358)Aspergillus versicolor (KJ152174)100134
PenicilliumPH30444 (KP714359)Penicillium chrysogenum (LN482541)100210
PH30424 (KP714360)Penicillium crustosum (LN482509)1003
PH30378 (KP714361)Penicillium cordubense (KJ191427)1003
PH30390 (KP714362)Penicillium lapidosum (KJ676451)1002
Glomerellales
ColletotrichumPH30420 (KP714363)Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (KF864554)10022
Helotiales
BotryotiniaPH30439 (KP714364)Botryotinia fuckeliana (KF802809)10022
Hypocreales
AcremoniumPH30454 (KP714365)Acremonium implicatum (HQ914932)9811
FusariumPH30410 (KP714366)Fusarium acuminatum (KF887097)10018
PH30386 (KP714367)Fusarium oxysporum (KJ026700)1003
PH30436 (KP714368)Fusarium solani (KF939488)10022
IlyonectriaPH30396 (KP714369)Ilyonectria macrodidyma (HQ703420)10023
PH30398 (KP714370)Ilyonectria macrodidyma (HQ703420)1001
MyrotheciumPH30382 (KP714371)Myrothecium sp. (HQ631058)99213
PlectosphaerellaPH30464 (KP714372)Plectosphaerella sp. (JX535104)1001125
PH30457 (KP714373)Plectosphaerella sp. (JX535104)991
TrichodermaPH30435 (KP714374)Trichoderma longibrachiatum (KJ767089)10016
PH30441 (KP714375)Trichoderma koningiopsis (KM079603)100211
PH30432 (KP714376)Trichoderma spirale (KM079610)1001
Microascales
PericoniaPH30428 (KP714377)Periconia byssoides (KC954160)9911
Pleosporales
AlternariaPH30445 (KP714378)Alternaria sp. (KC771455)100115
PH30438 (KP714379)Alternaria alternata (KM015489)10025
PH30452 (KP714380)Alternaria tenuissima (KF308886)10022
PH30425 (KP714381)Alternaria tenuissima (KF308886)10011
PH30442 (KP714382)Alternaria alternata (KM015489)1001
DictyosporiumPH30404 (KP714383)Dictyosporium digitatum (DQ018089)9811
PhomaPH30459 (KP714384)Phoma draconis (GU237795)10013
PH30391 (KP714385)Phoma radicina (JQ676200)992
Sordariales
ChaetomiumPH30461 (KP714386)Chaetomium globosum (KJ728838)10011
HumicolaPH30417 (KP714387)Humicola fuscoatra (JN031580)9911
ThielaviaPH30430 (KP714388)Thielavia arenaria (JX535015)9911
Incertae sedis
ArthriniumPH30448 (KP714390)Arthrinium arundinis (KF850624)9922
Xylariales
PestalotiopsisPH30451 (KP714391)Pestalotiopsis vismiae (JX305715)10024
PH30414 (KP714392)Pestalotiopsis uvicola (JN198506 )1002
Incertae sedisPH30402 (KP714389)Sordariomycetes sp. (JX244023)9922
ZYGOMYCETES
Mucorales
MucorPH30392 (KP714393)Mucor hiemalis (JF299220)10033
No. of total isolates4216121989
Analysis of 89 isolates from Panax notoginseng with the related species and their isolation information

Phytopathogens used for antagonistic assays

A. panax, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Phoma herbarum, and Mycocentrospora were isolated from rotten root samples of P. notoginseng collected from Wenshan in August, 2012. The identification was performed by morphological and ITS sequencing methods. The pathogenicity was confirmed by experiments with detached roots of healthy notoginseng plants (unpublished data).

In vitro antagonistic activity against host phytopathogens

Well-grown slant culture of each fungus was used for liquid culture in potato dextrose broth medium (50 mL/250 mL flasks). The flasks were incubated at 28 ± 1°C on a shaker at 180 rpm (Fig. 1C) for 7 d. The culture broth was filtered through blotting paper and the supernatant was separated. The supernatant was extracted three times with ethyl acetate (EtOAc). The wet mycelium was extracted twice with acetone. After removal of acetone in a rotary vacuum, the aliquot residue was extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined the EtOAc extracts from supernatant and mycelium, the organic phase was dried over Na2SO4 (anhydrous). The extracts were then concentrated in a rotary vacuum. The crude extracts were stored at 4°C before usage. The inhibitory effect of the EtOAc extracts obtained from endophytic fungi was tested using the double-layer agar technique [34] (Fig. 1D). The crude extracts were dissolved in 1.0 mL ethanol as stock solution. A 100-μL volume of the ethanol extract suspension was pipetted into each hole. Test plates were incubated at 28 ± 2°C, and the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured after 24 h. The same volume of ethanol was used as the negative control.

Results

A total of 89 endophytic fungi were isolated from the roots, stems, leaves, and seeds of healthy notoginseng plants. Forty-one morphotypes were recognizable on the basis of their morphological characteristics. One isolate of each morphotype was selected for classification by phylogenetic analysis. All sequences were BLAST searched in GenBank (NCBI database). The closest matches and the GeneBank accession numbers are listed in Table 1. Only isolate PH30454 revealed at least 98% similarity to known reported sequences. Among 89 endophytic fungi isolates, 86 belonged to phylum Ascomycota, and three to Zygomycota. All isolates were classified to 12 orders (Capnodiales, Chaetothyriales, Diaporthales, Eurotiales, Glomerellales, Helotiales, Hypocreales, Microascales, Mucorales, Pleosporales, Sordariales, Xylariales), 23 genera (Acremonium, Alternaria, Arthrinium, Aspergillus, Botryotinia, Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Colletotrichum, Dictyosporium, Fusarium, Humicola, Ilyonectria, Mucor, Myrothecium, Penicillium, Periconia, Pestalotiopsis, Phialophora, Phoma, Phomopsis, Plectosphaerella, Thielavia, and Trichoderma), in which isolate PH30448 belonging to genus Arthrinium was incertae sedis at order level and isolate PH30402 was an unknown fungus belonging to Sordariomycetes. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) revealed the relationship between the different species of fungal endophytes obtained from different parts of P. notoginseng. The most frequently occurring groups were Hypocreales with 26 isolates (29.2%) and Pleosporales with 19 isolates (21.3%). Hypocreales group included six genera: Acremonium, Fusarium, Ilyonectria, Myrothecium, Plectosphaerella, and Trichoderma. Pleosporales were integrated by three different genera: Alternaria, Dictyosporium, and Phoma. The groups Capnodiales, Chaetothyriales, Diaporthales, Glomerellales, Helotiales, Microascales, Mucorales, and Xylariales comprised only one taxon (genus) each (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The results suggested that there were diverse endophytic fungi harbored in the cultivated P. notoginseng.
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree based on neighbor-joining analysis of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences of the endophytic fungi obtained from different tissues of Panax notoginseng. Significant bootstrap values (> 50%) are indicated at the branching points. The tree has been drawn to scale (0.05).

Phylogenetic tree based on neighbor-joining analysis of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences of the endophytic fungi obtained from different tissues of Panax notoginseng. Significant bootstrap values (> 50%) are indicated at the branching points. The tree has been drawn to scale (0.05).

Fungal distribution analysis

The number of isolates obtained from different tissues of P. notoginseng ranged from 12 to 42 for leaves and roots, respectively (Table 1). Forty-two isolates from roots were assigned to 16 genera and an unknown taxon, and the genera Fusarium, Cladosporium, and Penicillium were the dominant groups. Nineteen isolates from seeds belonged to nine genera. Eight genera fungi (16 isolates) were obtained from stems. The Alternaria genus was dominant in seeds and stems. The amount of endophytic fungi from leaves was the least, with only 12 isolates belonging to four genera. In addition, the distribution of endophytic fungi showed significant differences in various organs and showed obvious specificity. For example, the endophytic fungi belonging to Colletotrichum, Ilyonectria, and Mucor were only isolated from roots.

Antagonism assay of fungal endophytes as potential biocontrol agents

All EtOAc crude extracts of 41 fungal endophyte strains were tested for antagonistic activities against five major fungal pathogens that cause root-rot disease of P. notoginseng (Table 2). Twenty-six of the 41 isolates (63.4%) exhibited activity against at least one of the pathogens tested. The highest frequency (16 isolates, 39.0%) was against the pathogen A. panax, followed by F. solani (15 isolates, 36.6 %), F. oxysporum (14 isolates, 34.1%), Phoma herbarum (12 isolates, 29.3%), and M. acerina (7 isolates, 17.1%), respectively. Five isolates, PH30409, PH30412, PH30414, PH30441, and PH30444, were found to inhibit all pathogens tested, implicating they have a broad spectrum of antagonistic activity. Isolates, PH30409, PH30414, PH30420, PH30424, and PH30441 exhibited relatively strong inhibitory effects against the pathogens F. oxysporum, F. solani, and Phoma herbarum. The broad spectrum or strong inhibitory activities of these strains against the host plant pathogens suggest that these endophytic fungi may be potential candidates for the production of bioactive compounds, and have the potential as biological control agents of root-rot disease of P. notoginseng. In other virulence tests with detached healthy notoginseng roots, isolates PH30409 and PH30412 were found to be able to cause root rot (unpublished data), although they showed antagonism to tested pathogens.
Table 2

Endophytic fungal antagonists of root-rot disease pathogens

Isolate No.Antagonistic activity1),2)
Alternaria panax,Fusarium oxysporumFusarium solaniPhoma herbarumMycocentrospora acerina
PH30378++
PH30382
PH30386+
PH30390+
PH30391
PH30392+
PH30396
PH30398
PH30402+
PH30403+++
PH30404+
PH30406
PH30409++++++++
PH30410
PH30412+++++++
PH30414++++++++
PH30417
PH30420+++++++
PH30424+++++++++
PH30425+
PH30427+++
PH30428
PH30430
PH30432+++
PH30435++
PH30436
PH30438
PH30439+++
PH30441++++++++++
PH30442+
PH30444++++++++
PH30445
PH30448+
PH30450++++
PH30451++
PH30452+
PH30454+
PH30457+
PH30459
PH30461++++++
PH30464

Estimated by measuring the diameter of the clear zone of growth inhibition

Symbols: −, no activity; +, ++, and +++, weak activity, moderate activity, and strong activity, respectively

Endophytic fungal antagonists of root-rot disease pathogens Estimated by measuring the diameter of the clear zone of growth inhibition Symbols: −, no activity; +, ++, and +++, weak activity, moderate activity, and strong activity, respectively

Discussion

Endophytic fungi have been considered as a promising source for the development of biological control agents (BCAs) against phytopathogens, because they exhibit the beneficial functions for host plants [24], [25], [26], [27], [35], [36], and are ubiquitous within almost every tissue type studied [37]. Even so, endophytic fungi are still a poorly investigated group of microorganisms [38], and their complex ecological functions remain to be extensively exploited. P. notoginseng, Panax ginseng, and Panax quinquefolius, have been widely used for medicinal plants all over the world. There are a few investigations of the endophytic fungi in Panax genus, but most of them have been focused on ginseng (P. ginseng) [29], [39], [40], [41], [42] and American ginseng (P. quinqefolius) [43]. P. notoginseng, an important Chinese medicine plant, has attracted increasing attention in medical and chemical fields because of its active ingredients, but little in ecological and other research areas because of its narrow distribution. In the present study, the diversity, tissue distribution, and biocontrol potential of cultivable endophytic fungi harbored in P. notoginseng plants were described for the first time. We proposed that the endophytic fungi would exert certain functions to help the host survive in plantation against disastrous root-rot diseases. In the survived and healthy notoginseng plants, the harbored fungal endophytes may give some clue to find effective approaches to control root rot, caused by complex pathogens. Thus, in order to screen for the most promising endophytes, we evaluated the potential of all the endophytic isolates as BCAs by challenging five major root-rot pathogens of the host plant, A. panax, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Phoma herbarum, and M. acerina, whose pathogenicity was confirmed in our previous work. Among the isolates, crude extracts of PH30409 and PH30441 showed strong inhibition on all tested phytopathogens, implicating that the two isolates have the potential to produce active compounds. Other isolates showed selective activity against one or two pathogens. According to the viewpoint by Zhang et al [36], the mechanisms involved in biocontrol of endophytic fungi against phytopathogens include antibiosis, competition for nutrients and space, induction of defense response, and mycoparasitism. The endophytic isolates can be used to screen their antagonistic activity by fermenting in different media in further work. Other mechanisms should also be investigated in the development of BCAs. For instance, Trichoderma spp. widely used in agriculture as biofungicides, have shown many ways against phytopathogens, such as producing active compounds, secreting hydrolytic enzymes, and competing for nutrients [44]. In this study, isolates belonging to Trichoderma were also obtained and tested as active endophytic strains. Endphytic fungus Penicillium chrysogenum showed effects on various plant pathogens [45], [46], [47]. García et al [48] reported that the isolate EEZ10 of Penicillium chrysogenum from soil inhibited the growth of Verticillium dahlia in vitro, and is a possible biological control agent for Verticillium disease [48]. The sequence of isolate PH30444 was 100% similar to that of Penicillium chrysogenum, and its crude extract also exhibited inhibition against all tested host phytopathogens. Recently, we found that some endophytic isolates can inhibit pathogens of notoginseng root-rot diseases by mycoparasitism and producing active secondary metabolites and volatile organic compounds [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54]. These findings showed that endophytic fungi from P. notoginseng are potential BCAs for the host plant. The culture-based study and molecular identification showed that the total fungal diversity was relatively high, and the overwhelming majority belonged to Ascomycota (96.6% of the total number of isolates). Only a single Zygomycota group was obtained. This finding is consistent with a previous study in Cannabis sativa L. [26]. In 12 morphologically distinct groups, Hypocreales (29.2%) and Pleosporales (21.3%) were dominant orders among the endophytic fungi of different tissues of P. notoginseng. This result was similar to the previous studies in many medicinal plants [26], [55]. The endophytic fungi associated with P. notoginseng comprised a number of dominant groups, such as Alternaria, Fusarium, and Penicillium. All these genera have been previously isolated as endophytes, not only from other Panax species [29], [39], [40], [42], but also from a wide range of plant hosts in the temperate and tropical zones [26], [56], [57]. Although, genera Alternaria, Cladosporium, Colletotrichum, and Fusarium were found as endophytes in all three Panax species (P. ginseng, P. notoginseng, and P. quinquefolium) [29], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], other genera Arthrinium, Botryotinia, Chaetomium, Dictyosporium, Humicola, Ilyonectria, Mucor, Periconia, Pestalotiopsis, and Thielavia, have not been obtained from other Panax plants, suggesting that P. notoginseng harbors specific and diverse fungi due to the unique soil, climatic conditions of Wenshan region and the approaches taken in agro-management. Some isolated taxa showed preference for specific tissues types. Previous studies in other plants have also indicated that endophytes exhibit tissues specificity [58], [59], [60]. As expected, tissue specificity of fungal endophytes was demonstrated in our study. Particular endophytes were only found in one tissue, which suggests that certain species survive within the specific chemistry or texture of different tissues [57]. The diversity and species richness of endophytic fungi were higher in the underground part (roots) than that in the above-ground parts (stems, leaves, and seeds). Some similar results have been reported in the previous studies [55], [57]. The possible reasons are that soil-borne fungi are typically more prevalent and diversified than those that infect aerial plant tissues [55], and there are abundant nutriments in roots of P. notoginseng that are suitable for the growth of fungi. The relative abundance of each fungus identified in P. notoginseng reflects an unequal distribution of isolate richness among species. Similar results have been found in other plants, such as Stellera chamaejasme and Taxus globose [55], [57]. Plant–endophytic fungus interactions have been extensively investigated. Most of the symbionts may have helped for host plants. It has also been confirmed that the pathogenic–endophytic lifestyles of some fungi are interchangeable [61], [62]. These phenomena are caused by many factors, such as environment changes, chemical inducers, and molecular and genetic bases [63], [64]. Groups of fungal phytopathogens also contain large numbers of endophytic taxa. In this study, isolates PH30409 and PH30412 caused root-rot symptoms in experimental infection through detached healthy roots of P. notoginseng (unpublished data). Interestingly, crude extracts of them showed antagonistic activities against the tested phytopathogens, and more experimental infections to confirm the pathogenicity of Cladosporium sp. for P. notoginseng in plantation are underway. It is also interesting that some species in Alternaria and Fusarium from soil are pathogenic fungi for P. notoginseng, and these genera were dominant groups in the endophytic isolates. In the cultivation soil, Fusarium was the most isolated genus [65]. Endophytes should originate from the environment in which their host plants live. Therefore, these genera have more opportunities to invade and colonize in the tissues, and evolve as endophytes. Their evolution should be investigated in the further studies. Nowadays, the notoginseng supply mainly relies on intensive field cultivation under artificial shade structures with fertile and moist soils as the wild-type notoginseng disappeared many years ago [66]. The long shade cultivation, pesticide spray, and chemical fertilizers are widely used in cultivation of notoginseng. To achieve higher yield, the frequencies of pesticide and fertilizer use increase more as the product price increases. These agricultural managements improve the productivity to some degree, but also cause other problems, such as being toxic to humans, animals, and other crops, and development of fungicide-tolerant pathogen strains [67]. At the same time, they affect the structures and functions of microorganisms in bulk soil, rhizosphere soil, and endophytes. The harmful effects should be investigated for further reasonable agro-applications in notoginseng planting. Taken together, our findings revealed that there are diverse endophytic fungi harbored in different tissues of P. notoginseng planted in Southwest China. The fungal endophytes serve as great promise not only as BCAs against the known and emerging phytopathogens of P. notoginseng, but also as a resource of biologically active novel secondary metabolites [68]. Three endophytic fungal isolates, PH30444, PH30414, and PH30441, are potential BCAs against A. panax, F. oxysporum, F. solani, Phoma herbarum, and M. acerina, and possibly other pathogens. Further studies are required to clarify the biocontrol active metabolites and the control efficiency of the potential endophytic isolates in both pot and field experiments. A full understanding of endophytic community structure, dynamics, and functions, and the shaping factors will be helpful in selecting pesticide, fertilizer, and other approaches for notoginseng planting.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
  45 in total

1.  Isolation, diversity, and antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacteria from medicinal plants of tropical rain forests in Xishuangbanna, China.

Authors:  Sheng Qin; Jie Li; Hua-Hong Chen; Guo-Zhen Zhao; Wen-Yong Zhu; Cheng-Lin Jiang; Li-Hua Xu; Wen-Jun Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  The use of beneficial microbial endophytes for plant biomass and stress tolerance improvement.

Authors:  Chuansheng Mei; Barry S Flinn
Journal:  Recent Pat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01

3.  Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) inhibits breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Peiwei Wang; Jingang Cui; Xiaoye Du; Qinbo Yang; Chenglin Jia; Minqi Xiong; Xintong Yu; Li Li; Wenjian Wang; Yu Chen; Teng Zhang
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 4.  What triggers grass endophytes to switch from mutualism to pathogenism?

Authors:  Carla J Eaton; Murray P Cox; Barry Scott
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 4.729

5.  Diversity and dynamics of fungal endophytes in leaves, stems and roots of Stellera chamaejasme L. in northwestern China.

Authors:  Hui Jin; Zhiqiang Yan; Quan Liu; Xiaoyan Yang; Jixiang Chen; Bo Qin
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 6.  Saponins in the genus Panax L. (Araliaceae): a systematic review of their chemical diversity.

Authors:  Wen-Zhi Yang; Ying Hu; Wan-Ying Wu; Min Ye; De-An Guo
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.072

7.  Light converts endosymbiotic fungus to pathogen, influencing seedling survival and niche-space filling of a common tropical tree, Iriartea deltoidea.

Authors:  Patricia Álvarez-Loayza; James F White; Mónica S Torres; Henrik Balslev; Thea Kristiansen; Jens-Christian Svenning; Nathalie Gil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Bidirectional regulation of angiogenesis and miR-18a expression by PNS in the mouse model of tumor complicated by myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Qinbo Yang; Xiaoyan Wang; Jingang Cui; Peiwei Wang; Minqi Xiong; Chenglin Jia; Li Liu; Bingbing Ning; Li Li; Wenjian Wang; Yu Chen; Teng Zhang
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Koninginins N-Q, Polyketides from the Endophytic Fungus Trichoderma koningiopsis Harbored in Panax notoginseng.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Ya-Bin Yang; Jin-Lian Chen; Cui-Ping Miao; Qiang Wang; Hao Zhou; You-Wei Chen; Yi-Qing Li; Zhong-Tao Ding; Li-Xing Zhao
Journal:  Nat Prod Bioprospect       Date:  2016-01-11

10.  Age-dependent Distribution of Fungal Endophytes in Panax ginseng Roots Cultivated in Korea.

Authors:  Young-Hwan Park; Young-Chang Kim; Sang Un Park; Hyoun-Sub Lim; Joon Bum Kim; Byoung-Kwan Cho; Hanhong Bae
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.060

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Endophytic fungal communities and their biotechnological implications for agro-environmental sustainability.

Authors:  Ajar Nath Yadav; Divjot Kour; Tanvir Kaur; Rubee Devi; Ashok Yadav
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  In Vitro Phytobiological Investigation of Bioactive Secondary Metabolites from the Malus domestica-Derived Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus tubingensis Strain AN103.

Authors:  Hassan Mohamed; Weaam Ebrahim; Mona El-Neketi; Mohamed F Awad; Huaiyuan Zhang; Yao Zhang; Yuanda Song
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.927

3.  A transcriptome analysis uncovers Panax notoginseng resistance to Fusarium solani induced by methyl jasmonate.

Authors:  Diqiu Liu; Qin Zhao; Xiuming Cui; Rui Chen; Xin Li; Bingling Qiu; Feng Ge
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.839

4.  The effects of dark septate endophyte (DSE) inoculation on tomato seedlings under Zn and Cd stress.

Authors:  Lingling Zhu; Tao Li; Chaojun Wang; Xiaorong Zhang; Lujuan Xu; Runbing Xu; Zhiwei Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Fungal endophytes inhabiting mountain-cultivated ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer): Diversity and biocontrol activity against ginseng pathogens.

Authors:  Young-Hwan Park; Yoosam Kim; Ratnesh Chandra Mishra; Hanhong Bae
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Investigating chemical features of Panax notoginseng based on integrating HPLC fingerprinting and determination of multiconstituents by single reference standard.

Authors:  Zhenzhong Yang; Jieqiang Zhu; Han Zhang; Xiaohui Fan
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.060

7.  Molecular profiling and bioactive potential of an endophytic fungus Aspergillus sulphureus isolated from Sida acuta: a medicinal plant.

Authors:  M Murali; C Mahendra; P Hema; N Rajashekar; A Nataraju; M S Sudarshana; K N Amruthesh
Journal:  Pharm Biol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.503

Review 8.  Exploring endophytes for in vitro synthesis of bioactive compounds similar to metabolites produced in vivo by host plants.

Authors:  Hemant Sharma; Arun Kumar Rai; Divakar Dahiya; Rajen Chettri; Poonam Singh Nigam
Journal:  AIMS Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-26

9.  Isolation and characterization of plumbagin (5- hydroxyl- 2- methylnaptalene-1,4-dione) producing endophytic fungi Cladosporium delicatulum from endemic medicinal plants: Isolation and characterization of plumbagin producing endophytic fungi from endemic medicinal plants.

Authors:  N Venkateswarulu; S Shameer; P V Bramhachari; S K Thaslim Basha; C Nagaraju; T Vijaya
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2018-09-28

10.  Insight to shape of soil microbiome during the ternary cropping system of Gastradia elata.

Authors:  Qing-Song Yuan; Jiao Xu; Weike Jiang; Xiaohong Ou; Hui Wang; Lanping Guo; Chenghong Xiao; Yanhong Wang; Xiao Wang; Chuanzhi Kang; Tao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.