Literature DB >> 27158233

Rhizospheric fungi of Panax notoginseng: diversity and antagonism to host phytopathogens.

Cui-Ping Miao1, Qi-Li Mi2, Xin-Guo Qiao1, You-Kun Zheng1, You-Wei Chen1, Li-Hua Xu1, Hui-Lin Guan3, Li-Xing Zhao1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rhizospheric fungi play an essential role in the plant-soil ecosystem, affecting plant growth and health. In this study, we evaluated the fungal diversity in the rhizosphere soil of 2-yr-old healthy Panax notoginseng cultivated in Wenshan, China.
METHODS: Culture-independent Illumina MiSeq and culture-dependent techniques, combining molecular and morphological characteristics, were used to analyze the rhizospheric fungal diversity. A diffusion test was used to challenge the phytopathogens of P. notoginseng.
RESULTS: A total of 16,130 paired-end reads of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 were generated and clustered into 860 operational taxonomic units at 97% sequence similarity. All the operational taxonomic units were assigned to five phyla and 79 genera. Zygomycota (46.2%) and Ascomycota (37.8%) were the dominant taxa; Mortierella and unclassified Mortierellales accounted for a large proportion (44.9%) at genus level. The relative abundance of Fusarium and Phoma sequences was high, accounting for 12.9% and 5.5%, respectively. In total, 113 fungal isolates were isolated from rhizosphere soil. They were assigned to five classes, eight orders (except for an Incertae sedis), 26 genera, and 43 species based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer. Fusarium was the most isolated genus with six species (24 isolates, 21.2%). The abundance of Phoma was also relatively high (8.0%). Thirteen isolates displayed antimicrobial activity against at least one test fungus.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that diverse fungi including potential pathogenic ones exist in the rhizosphere soil of 2-yr-old P. notoginseng and that antagonistic isolates may be useful for biological control of pathogens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Illumina MiSeq; Panax notoginseng; fungal diversity; rhizosphere soil

Year:  2015        PMID: 27158233      PMCID: PMC4845048          DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ginseng Res        ISSN: 1226-8453            Impact factor:   6.060


Introduction

Soil microbial communities display high structural, genetic, and functional diversity, and play extremely complex roles in many aspects of soil ecosystems, such as biotic interactions and nutrient cycling [1]. Microbial diversity in soil is an important factor determining soil health and is considered one of the main drivers in soil suppressiveness [2]. The rhizosphere is one of the most complex environments that are influenced by plant roots and active microhabitat where plant roots and microbes interact [3], [4]. Composition of the rhizosphere microbiota can negatively or positively influence plant traits such as stress tolerance, health, development, and productivity [5], [6]. Conversely, host plants are able to shape their own rhizosphere microbiome by adjusting environmental factors such as pH, soil nutrients, and root architecture [5], and recent studies have shown that plant genotype also has a great influence on the structure of rhizosphere microbial communities [7], [8], [9]. Fungi and fungus-like organisms form one of the most diverse groups of the Eukarya, and represent an essential functional component of soil microbial communities [10]. Under unfavorable conditions, some fungi can cause plant diseases and sometimes even total loss of the crop yields. In many instances, these diseases are caused by a complex of fungal species. At the same time, other fungal groups can antagonize phytopathogens, decompose plant residues, supply nutrients for plants, and stimulate plant growth [11]. The culture-dependent approach has been applied to analyze the fungal diversity for several decades [12]. In the past 20 yrs, many molecular methods, such as terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and real-time quantitative PCR detecting system (Q-PCR), have widely been used to study the diversity and composition of soil microbial communities [13], [14]. With methodological advances, high-throughput sequencing techniques, such as 454 pyrosequencing and MiSeq by Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA), have been considered more powerful tools for estimating microbial communities [14], [15]. Compared to the 454 pyrosequencing, MiSeq sequencing has shorter time for generating good-quality paired-end reads and a much higher throughput at a low price [15], [16], [17]. The length of reads can reach 2 × 300 bp. Due to lower costs and greater throughput, Illumina MiSeq sequencing is increasingly being utilized to estimate the diversity and composition of microbial communities in various ecosystems. Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F. H. Chen (Araliaceae), a well-known traditional Chinese medicinal plant mainly cultivated in the mountainous areas in Yunnan and Guangxi, is widely used for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, inflammation, trauma, and internal and external bleeding due to injury, and has also been used as a tonic [18], [19]. Grown under shaded conditions with high humidity for at least 3 yrs, cultivation of P. notoginseng is easily affected by the soil environment, and P. notoginseng is also susceptible to a number of soil-borne diseases [20]. Among the diseases, the root-rot disease complex caused by a single pathogen or a combination of pathogens is most destructive because it results in yield reduction, or no harvest, and a lower content of active ingredients [21]. The reported pathogens include Alternaria panax, Alternaria tenuissima, Cylindrocarpon destructans, Cylindrocarpon didynum, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Phytophthora cactorum, Phoma herbarum, and Rhizoctonia solani [22]. Fungal pathogens, endophytes, and rhizosphere microbes of Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius have been reported [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Investigation on fungi associated with P. notoginseng has been focused on pathogens, and few reports were about the diversity of fungal community in the rhizosphere soil of P. notoginseng. In this study, the diversity of the rhizospheric fungal community of 2-yr-old healthy P. notoginseng plants was characterized using a MiSeq sequencing platform (2 × 300 bp). The culturable fungal community was also analyzed by culture-dependent methods, and the antagonistic activities of the fungal isolates were also challenged by the pathogens, A. panax, F. oxysporum, F. solani, and P. herbarum, isolated from rotten roots of P. notoginseng. The further purposes include the following: (1) finding antagonistic fungi for the development of biocontrol agents for soil-borne diseases of P. notoginseng; (2) exploring the active substances from antagonistic fungal strains; and (3) investigating the fungal structure for in-depth studies on microbial ecological functions.

Materials and methods

Site and sampling

Soil samples were collected in a P. notoginseng plantation (N 23°35′, E 103°40′) in Wenshan, Yunnan, in early June 2013. Soil adhering around the roots was gently taken off, put into a sterile plastic bag, and transported to the laboratory within 24 h. Soil samples were preserved at −80°C and 4°C before use.

Soil DNA extraction and MiSeq sequencing

DNA was extracted from 0.5 g frozen soil sample using the PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region was amplified according to the newly developed primers fITS9 and ITS4 [28]. Amplifications were carried out in a total volume of 50 μL using 10 ng of DNA, 5 μL 10 × polymerase chain reaction (PCR) buffer, 5 μL deoxy-ribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) (10mM each), 2.5 unit Plantium Taq, and 0.5 μL each of Bar-PCR primer (50μM) and Primer R (50μM). PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 58°C, 30 s at 72°C; and 7 min at 72°C. The PCR products were purified and run using a MiSeq Benchtop for 2 × 300 bp paired-end sequencing (Illumina). The quality check was performed using PRINSEQ-lite 0.19.5. All sequences were aligned using UCLUST v1.1.579 (http://www.drive5.com/uclust/downloads1_1_579.html), and complete linkage clustering was used to define operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% identity as a cutoff. Rarefaction analysis was performed using MOTHUR v.1.22.2 [29]. Diversity in the sample was estimated using the Shannon–Weiner index and the species richness was expressed as the number of OTUs by the nonparametric indices abundance-based coverage estimate (ACE) and Chao1 [30]. In addition, taxonomy assignment was performed using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier [31].

Isolation of fungi

Fungal isolation was carried out using the dilution method. Soil sample (10 g) was mixed with 90 mL sterile water in a conical flask, and the soil solution was diluted from 10−1 to 10−3 after shaking for 1 h in an oscillator. A volume of 0.1 mL soil solution (10−3) was coated evenly on potato dextrose agar with penicillin sodium salt (100 mg in 1 L medium) and kanamycin sulfate (50 mg in 1 L medium) to suppress bacterial growth. All plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 wk or until fungal growth was observed. Emergent hyphae were transferred and purified on sterile potato dextrose agar plates. Fungal isolates were grouped into morphotypes on the basis of their morphological differences.

Molecular identification and diversity analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from pure cultures of a representative isolate of each fungal morphotype using the method of Guo et al [32]. The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions including the 5.8S gene were subsequently amplified using the primer set ITS1 and ITS4 [33]. The amplification was performed in a total volume of 50 μL containing 10–50 ng of genomic DNA, 0.4μM of each primer, 0.2mM dNTP, 2.5 unit Easytaq DNA polymerase, and 5 μL 10× EasyTaq buffer (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China). Conditions for amplification were as follows: an initial denaturation step of 4 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 55°C, 2 min at 72°C, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Purified PCR products were directly sequenced with primer pairs as mentioned above in the ABI 3730-XL DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA). DNA sequences were analyzed with DNASTAR version 5.03 software (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI, USA), and fungal identification was performed using the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and BLAST searches.

Determination of antagonistic fungi against pathogens of root-rot disease

Antimicrobial activities of isolated fungi were determined by the agar diffusion method. The root-rot pathogens A. panax, F. oxysporum, F. solani, and P. herbarum were used as the targets for antagonistic determination. Selected isolates were inoculated into 250 mL conical flasks, each with 50 mL of potato dextrose broth, and incubated at 28°C on a shaker at 170 rpm for 7 d. Then, 200 μL of culture suspension was added into a well (diameter: 5 mm) of the potato dextrose agar plate with pathogens. After incubation at 28°C for 4 d, the activity was expressed as the diameter of the growth inhibition zone (in mm). Each treatment was performed in triplicate.

Results

Fungal diversity and relative abundance in the rhizosphere soil of 2-yr-old P. notoginseng

After quality filtering, a total of 16,130 paired-end reads were generated from 2-yr-old P. notoginseng rhizosphere soil sample using an Illumina MiSeq platform, and the sequencing coverage reached 0.98. The average length of these reads was 346 bp. All reads were clustered into 860 OTUs containing 564 non-singletons and 296 singletons at 97% sequence similarity. Rarefaction curves showed that the number of OTUs observed increased with the number of sequences sampled, and reached the near plateau region at 97% similarity level (Fig. 1A). The number of OTUs observed was still lower than the number of OTUs estimated with the nonparametric Chao1 (Fig. 1B) and ACE (Fig. 1C) indices (1,243 and 1,199, respectively) at 97% similarity. The Shannon diversity index (H′ = 4.44, Fig. 1D) showed that the fungi were highly diverse in 2-yr-old P. notoginseng rhizosphere soil.
Fig. 1

Rarefaction curves showing the number of similarity-based OTUs at a cluster distance value of 0.03. Rarefaction analysis of (A) species richness, (B) Chao1 index, (C) ACE index, and (D) Shannon index. Four rarefaction curves reached the near plateau phase, representing good sampling depth.

We assessed the distribution of fungal taxa at phylum and genus levels using the RDP classifier. They were assigned to five phyla and 79 genera. At phylum level, most fungal sequences were distributed in five phyla (Fig. 2A), Zygomycota (46.2%), Ascomycota (37.8%), Basidiomycota (5.9%), Chytridiomycota (1.6%), and Glomeromycota (1.2%), and others belonged to unclassified fungi. At genus level (Fig. 2B), Mortierella and unclassified Mortierellales accounted for a large proportion (44.9%). It is noteworthy that the relative abundance of Fusarium and Phoma sequences was high, accounting for 12.9% and 5.5%, respectively. Nearly all the Fusarium sequences were identified to be F. oxysporum, which was considered the major pathogen of root rot in P. notoginseng [22]. The taxa below 0.7% were grouped together and represented as “other” in Fig. 2B.
Fig. 2

Proportional distribution of fungal taxa. Distribution of fungal (A) phyla and (B) genera present in rhizosphere soil of 2-year-old healthy Panax notoginseng, as revealed by MiSeq sequencing. “Other” in Fig. 2B represents all the taxa below 0.7%.

Identification and diversity of isolated fungi

A total of 113 fungal isolates were obtained from the rhizosphere soil of P. notoginseng; among them 43 morphotypes were recognizable based on their morphological characteristics. One isolate of each morphotype was used for phylogenetic analysis. ITS sequences of the 43 isolates were sequenced and blasted in GenBank, and the closest matches, the accession number in GenBank (Nos. KP230805–KP230847), are listed in Table 1. The phylogenetic analysis was performed with MEGA 5 program (http://www.megasoftware.net/); the resulting phylogenetic tree of all sequences obtained in this study, together with selected GenBank sequences of close relatives, is shown in Fig. 3.
Table 1

The analysis of rhizospheric fungi associated with Panax notoginseng with the related species based on BLASTN search and their relative abundance

IsolateClosest species in GenBank (accession No.)Sequence coverage (%)Max. identity (%)Taxon (accession no.)Relative abundance (%)
Sordariomycetes
PH30033Plectosphaerella sp. FJ43071510099Plectosphaerella sp. KP2308343.54
Plectosphaerella cucumerinaJQ7967559999
PH30017Gibellulopsis nigrescensKC15664499100Gibellulopsis nigrescens KP2308181.77
PH30029Gliomastix masseeiAB54055410099Gliomastix masseei KP2308302.66
PH30019Trichoderma koningiopsisKF49418310099Trichoderma sp.1 KP2308202.66
Trichoderma gamsiiKJ68037110099
PH30004Trichoderma harzianumFJ442660100100Trichoderma sp.2 KP2308051.77
Trichoderma aureovirideAF359400100100
PH30008Paecilomyces marquandiiKM20361710099Paecilomyces marquandii KP2308094.43
PH30022Purpureocillium lilacinumFJ76502410099Purpureocillium lilacinum KP2308230.88
PH30018Cylindrocarpon sp. HQ63728910099Cylindrocarpon sp.1 KP2308191.77
PH30026Cylindrocarpon sp. AB72590110097Cylindrocarpon sp.2 KP2308272.66
PH30045Fusarium solaniHE97445510099Fusarium solani KP2308465.31
PH30025Fusarium chlamydosporumKF494035100100Fusarium chlamydosporum KP2308263.54
PH30010Fusarium oxysporumJX573316100100Fusarium oxysporum KP2308115.31
PH30012Fusarium tricinctumKJ598867100100Fusarium sp. KP2308133.54
Fusarium acuminatumKF887097100100
PH30034Fusarium merismoidesAB58699810099Fusarium merismoides KP2308350.88
PH30043Fusarium flocciferumJN676123100100Fusarium flocciferum KP2308442.66
PH30011Volutella ciliataHQ70341910099Volutella ciliata KP2308123.54
PH30007Chaetomium megalocarpumKC10974310099Chaetomium sp. KP2308082.66
Chaetomium globosumJN20987010099
PH30021Chaetomium globosumKF05368010099Chaetomium globosum KP2308221.77
PH30006Arthrinium arundinisKF14488810099Arthrinium sp. KP2308070.88
Arthrinium sacchariAB69390110099
PH30020Pestalotiopsis cocculiEF0551919999Pestalotiopsis sp.1 KP2308210.88
Pestalotiopsis caudataEF0551889999
PH30024Pestalotiopsis disseminataHQ60799210099Pestalotiopsis sp.2 KP2308250.88
Pestalotiopsis vismiaeEF05521810099
Pestalotiopsis neglectaEF05522210099
PH30031Pestalotiopsis lespedezaeGQ869901100100Pestalotiopsis lespedezae KP2308321.77
PH30044Pestalotiopsis neglectaEF05521399100Pestalotiopsis sp.3 KP2308451.77
Pestalotiopsis lespedezaeEF05520699100
PH30046Sarocladium strictumGQ376096100100Sarocladium strictum KP2308471.77
Eurotiomycetes
PH30035Penicillium chrysogenumAY373902100100Penicillium sp. KP2308362.66
Penicillium allii-sativiKJ775600100100
PH30009Penicillium vancouverenseJN61767510099Penicillium vancouverense KP2308101.77
PH30005Aspergillus nidulansAY373888100100Aspergillus nidulans KP2308062.66
Chaetothyriomycetes
PH30028Exophiala pisciphilaNR12126910099Exophiala pisciphila KP2308292.66
Dothideomycetes
PH30027Microsphaeropsis arundinisJQ34434410099Microsphaeropsis arundinis KP2308281.77
PH30041Paraconiothyrium brasilienseKJ7670999298Paraconiothyrium sp. KP2308420.88
PH30037Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioidesKC215138100100Paraconiothyrium cyclothyrioides KP2308381.77
PH30036Peyronellaea pinodellaKM030324100100Peyronellaea pinodella KP2308370.88
PH30030Phoma sp. JN20731910099Phoma sp.1 KP2308311.77
PH30038Phoma herbarumKJ76707910099Phoma herbarum KP2308393.54
PH30032Tetraplosphaeria sasicolaNR1194049997Tetraplosphaeria sp. KP2308330.88
PH30039Phaeosphaeriopsis sp. JQ93618510099Phaeosphaeriopsis sp. KP2308401.77
PH30040Phoma sp. JQ2386179495Phoma sp.2 KP2308410.88
PH30013Phoma medicaginisKF8503779998Phoma sp.3 KP2308141.77
PH30023Pyrenochaeta sp. HQ91482910099Pyrenochaeta sp. KP2308240.88
PH30016Alternaria tenuissimaKM921667100100Alternaria sp.2 KP2308173.54
Alternaria alternataKM371730100100
PH30015Cladosporium cladosporioidesHQ832794100100Cladosporium cladosporioides KP2308162.66
PH30014Cladosporium cladosporioidesKJ589542100100Cladosporium sp. KP2308151.77
Cladosporium tenuissimumKJ152168100100
Zygomycetes
PH30042Mortierella alpinaFJ025167100100Mortierella alpina KP2308436.19
Shannon diversity index (H′)3.62
Species richness (S)43
Fig. 3

Neighbor-joining analysis of ITS sequences of 43 taxa from Panax notoginseng showing the relationships of culturable fungi with closest relatives. Bootstrap values are shown at the branches (1,000 replicates). The name of some groups is shown in bold letters: A, Sordariomycetes; B, Eurotiomycetes; C, Chaetothyriomycetes; D, Dothideomycetes; and E, Zygomycetes.

Based on the phylogenetic analysis of the 99 sequences (43 isolates and 56 sequences from GenBank), the isolates were distributed into two major groups. Forty-two isolates belonging to ascomycetes were grouped together in the first group, and the second group consisted of one zygomycetesisolate (PH30042). Five different fungal subgroups were identified, with four corresponding to Ascomycota − Sordariomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Chaetothyriomycetes, and Dothideomycetes; and one subgroup belonging to Zygomycota, Zygomycetes. Sordariomycetes was the most dominant class (59.3%) comprising three orders (Hypocreales, Sordariales, and Xylariales) and a fungal strain of Incertae sedis (PH30006), and 23 species. Dothideomycetes (24.76%) included two orders, Pleosporales and Capnodiales, and 14 species. Among the 43 identified fungal isolates, Mortierella alpina, F. oxysporum, and F. solani were the dominant species, which accounted for 6.19%, 5.31%, and 5.31% of the total isolates, respectively. Fusarium was the most isolated genus with 24 isolates (21.24%) and also the most diverse genus with six species, followed by Phoma and Pestalotiopsis, representing 7.96% and 5.3% of the total isolates (each with 4 species), respectively. Although Mortierella accounted for 6.19% of the total isolates, the genus contained only one species. Species richness (S = 43) and Shannon diversity index (H′ = 3.62) showed that the fungal species diversity was high in the rhizosphere soil of 2-yr-old P. notoginseng (Table 1).

Distribution of fungi with antimicrobial activity

Thirty-five of the 43 fungal isolates were challenged by four pathogenic fungi causing root rot of P. notoginseng, excepting eight potential pathogenic fungi, PH30010, PH30011, PH30018, PH30026, PH30033, PH30038, PH30043, and PH30045. Thirteen isolates (37.1%) displayed antimicrobial activity against at least one pathogenic fungus (Table 2). The antagonists were distributed in nine genera, mainly in Pestalotiopsis (3 species), Cladosporium (2 species), Trichoderma (2 species), and Chaetomium (2 species) (Table 2). Of the 13 isolates, eight were active against A. panax, 10 demonstrated activity against F. oxysporum, five displayed activity against F. solani, and only one showed weak activity against P. herbarum. Isolate PH30019 exhibited antimicrobial activity against all pathogen fungi tested. Four isolates (PH30007, PH30016, PH30019, and PH30035) exhibited moderate or strong antimicrobial activity against F. oxysporum and F. solani.
Table 2

Antagonistic activities of fungal isolates against pathogenic fungi of Panax notoginseng

solate No.Diameter of the growth inhibition zone (mm)
Alternaria panaxFusarium oxysporumFusarium solaniPhoma herbarum
PH30004108
PH300071011
PH3001478
PH3001588
PH300161214
PH3001711
PH30019913157
PH3002011
PH3002199
PH3002410
PH3002712
PH300319
PH30035121010

Discussion

Fungal diversity analysis using high-throughput sequencing techniques is becoming more common [34]. Compared to 454 pyrosequencing, Illumina sequencing has more advantages under the same effect [15], [35]. Furthermore, the MiSeq platform can generate longer paired-end reads (2 × 300 bp). To our knowledge, a few studies have used MiSeq as a sequencing platform to study diversity and community composition of microbes [36], [37], [38]. Therefore, in this study, this new sequencing technique was employed to analyze the fungal diversity in the rhizosphere soil of P. notoginseng for the first time. A total of 16,978 raw reads were generated from the sequencer, and 16,130 sequences (95%) passed the quality filtering. A total of 860 OTUs were identified using a 97% cutoff during sequence clustering. The number of OTUs observed was lower than that of OTUs estimated with the nonparametric ACE and Chao1 indices at 97% similarity. Zygomycota was the dominant fungal phylum and represented 46.2% of all fungal DNA sequences, in which Mortierella accounted for a high relative abundance. Mortierella is ubiquitous in the bulk and rhizosphere soil from a range of temperate and tropical forests and agricultural habitats. A large number of Mortierella species exist in the rhizosphere soil of P. notoginseng, inferring that they play a potential role in keeping microecological balance as protective microbes to suppress soil-borne pathogens by competing for nutrition, or assisting the host plants with the uptake of phosphorus and nitrogen. Curlevski et al [39] suggested that Mortierella spp. might be an important component of phosphorus cycling. DNA barcoding is increasingly applied to catalogue and classify biodiversity [40]. Generally, in culture-independent researches, fungal diversity is studied based on the analysis of either the small subunit or the ITS region of the nuclear ribosomal RNA gene. Owing to its higher rate of evolution than the small subunit fragment, the ITS region has been selected as the universal barcode for fungal identification [41]. Due to length constraints of high-throughput metabarcoding, early metabarcoding studies were restricted to the use of either ITS1 or ITS2 [42], [43]. However, because of the difference between the rates of evolution of ITS1 and ITS2, the composition of fungal communities characterized by ITS1 or ITS2 may be different. Bazzicalupo et al [40] suggested that ITS2 may be more variable and recovers higher operational taxonomic riches than ITS1, although both fragments performed equally well when evaluating community structures. Monard et al [34] proposed that ITS1 appeared to be a better choice for sequencing, and analysis of both ITS regions were complementary. In addition, selection of the primer is very important to reduce the quantity of the out-targeted sequences and chimeras. Ihrmark et al [28] evaluated the new primers—fITS7, gITS7, and fITS9—together with the ITS4 primer to amplify the ITS2 region by 454 sequencing. Primers fITS7 and fITS9 yielded a lower proportion of nonfungal sequences than gITS7. However, the fITS7 primer mismatched against most sequences of Mucorales. Mucoralean fungi are widely dispersed and occur in various habitats as saprobes in most ecosystems, such as soil, dung, dead plant material, and water [44]. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed the fungal diversity in the rhizosphere soil of P. notoginseng by amplifying the fungal ITS2 region using the fITS9f/ITS4 primer combination. The dataset obtained from the Illumina MiSeq platform was basically satisfactory and also supported the conclusion proposed by Ihrmark et al [28] In pure-culture experiments, we isolated 113 fungal strains from the rhizosphere soil of 2-yr-old P. notoginseng. Based on the phylogenetic analysis and morphological characteristics, the isolates were assigned to five classes, eight orders (except for an I. sedis), 26 genera, and 43 species (Table 1; Fig. 3). Chen et al [27] reported that Penicillium, Trichoderma, and Fusarium were the dominant fungal populations in ginseng rhizosphere soil in northeastern China. The composition, quality, and diversity distribution of soil fungi showed great differences between ginseng and notoginseng, but the proportion of pathogens was high in both plant rhizosphere soils. As evident from the results of culture-independent experiments, the proportion of Fusarium and Phoma is high, suggesting that the plant is in danger of pathogen invasion, although it appears to be healthy at the sampling time (early in June). Root-rot diseases of P. notoginseng usually occur heavily in July and August, as environmental and weather conditions are optimal for the pathogens. The relatively high frequency of Fusarium and Phoma may give some interpretation. At the same time, antagonistic isolates were also detected and obtained during this study. The antagonists may be useful in inhibiting or suppressing the growth of potential root-rot pathogenic fungi in the soil ecological systems. In our previous work, we found a fungus Aspergillus versicolor (PH30001) from the rhizosphere soil of 1-yr-old healthy P. notoginseng, which produced antagonistic compounds against F. solani [45]. Further in-depth studies are needed to investigate the ecological effects of the antagonists. Cylindrocarpon species were the major pathogens causing root rot of P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius [46], [47]. Miao et al [22] reported that C. destructans and C. didynum caused root rot of P. notoginseng with weak pathogenicity but wide distribution. Two Cylindrocarpon isolates (PH30018 and PH30026) were also obtained during this study. However, Cylindrocarpon was not detected in high-throughput sequencing tests. For this case, it may be associated with primer design or various quality-control approaches or database selection. U'Ren et al [48] also confirmed that primer selection influenced pyrosequencing-based inferences of diversity and community composition. Most environmental microorganisms are unculurable in commonly used media and culture conditions. Rhizosphere is a unique environment, where beneficial microbes and pathogens have an important influence on the growth and health of plants [49]. Root exudates also play an important role in plant–microorganism interactions and functioning of the rhizosphere [50]. Moreover, fertilizers, fungicides, and other agrochemicals applied can also affect the composition and structure of soil microbial communities that may be closely linked with ecosystem functions [51], [52], [53]. These findings suggest that more attention should be devoted to changes in the microbial communities. Improving and combining pure-culture and culture-independent techniques can contribute to a better understanding of rhizosphere ecology. This will be helpful in improving the management of notoginseng planting.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
  31 in total

1.  Dynamics of fungal communities in bulk and maize rhizosphere soil in the tropics.

Authors:  Newton C Marcial Gomes; Olajire Fagbola; Rodrigo Costa; Norma Gouvea Rumjanek; Arno Buchner; Leda Mendona-Hagler; Kornelia Smalla
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Adjuvant effect of Panax notoginseng saponins on the immune responses to ovalbumin in mice.

Authors:  Hong-Xiang Sun; Yi-Ping Ye; Hang-Jun Pan; Yuan-Jiang Pan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi.

Authors:  Conrad L Schoch; Keith A Seifert; Sabine Huhndorf; Vincent Robert; John L Spouge; C André Levesque; Wen Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rhizospheric fungal community structure of a Bt brinjal and a near isogenic variety.

Authors:  A K Singh; M Singh; S K Dubey
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.772

5.  Change of microbial community structure and functional gene abundance in nonylphenol-degrading sediment.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Yuyin Yang; Tao He; Shuguang Xie
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; William A Walters; Donna Berg-Lyons; James Huntley; Noah Fierer; Sarah M Owens; Jason Betley; Louise Fraser; Markus Bauer; Niall Gormley; Jack A Gilbert; Geoff Smith; Rob Knight
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Mucorales from the semiarid of Pernambuco, Brazil.

Authors:  André Luiz Cabral Monteiro de Azevedo Santiago; Paulo Jorge Parreira Dos Santos; Leonor Costa Maia
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.476

Review 8.  The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health.

Authors:  Roeland L Berendsen; Corné M J Pieterse; Peter A H M Bakker
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 18.313

9.  Age-dependent Distribution of Fungal Endophytes in Panax ginseng Roots Cultivated in Korea.

Authors:  Young-Hwan Park; Young-Chang Kim; Sang Un Park; Hyoun-Sub Lim; Joon Bum Kim; Byoung-Kwan Cho; Hanhong Bae
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.060

10.  Ultradeep 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of geographically similar but diverse unexplored marine samples reveal varied bacterial community composition.

Authors:  Chairmandurai Aravindraja; Dharmaprakash Viszwapriya; Shunmugiah Karutha Pandian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  23 in total

1.  Improved ginseng production under continuous cropping through soil health reinforcement and rhizosphere microbial manipulation with biochar: a field study of Panax ginseng from Northeast China.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Rong Xia; Man Tang; Xue Chen; Bin Zhong; Xiaoyu Liu; Rongjun Bian; Li Yang; Jufeng Zheng; Kun Cheng; Xuhui Zhang; Marios Drosos; Lianqing Li; Shengdao Shan; Stephen Joseph; Genxing Pan
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 2.  The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng.

Authors:  Paul H Goodwin
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-02

3.  Dynamic changes in rhizosphere fungi in different developmental stages of wheat in a confined and isolated environment.

Authors:  Ruxin Sun; Zhihao Yi; Yuming Fu; Hong Liu
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Antagonistic activity and characterization of indigenous soil isolates of bacteria and fungi against onion wilt incited by Fusarium sp.

Authors:  Hilda Karim; Andi Asmawati Azis; Oslan Jumadi
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.552

5.  Diversity and bioactive potential of culturable fungal endophytes of Dysosma versipellis; a rare medicinal plant endemic to China.

Authors:  Xiao-Ming Tan; Ya-Qin Zhou; Xiao-Lei Zhou; Xiang-Hua Xia; Ying Wei; Li-Li He; Hong-Zhen Tang; Li-Ying Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Endophytic fungi harbored in Panax notoginseng: diversity and potential as biological control agents against host plant pathogens of root-rot disease.

Authors:  You-Kun Zheng; Cui-Ping Miao; Hua-Hong Chen; Fang-Fang Huang; Yu-Mei Xia; You-Wei Chen; Li-Xing Zhao
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 6.060

7.  A Comparative Analysis on the Structure and Function of the Panax notoginseng Rhizosphere Microbiome.

Authors:  Ling Kui; Baozheng Chen; Jian Chen; Rouhallah Sharifi; Yang Dong; Zhanjiang Zhang; Jianhua Miao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  High-throughput sequencing-based analysis of endogenetic fungal communities inhabiting the Chinese Cordyceps reveals unexpectedly high fungal diversity.

Authors:  Fei Xia; Xin Chen; Meng-Yuan Guo; Xiao-Hui Bai; Yan Liu; Guang-Rong Shen; Yu-Ling Li; Juan Lin; Xuan-Wei Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Rhizospheric microbial communities associated with wild and cultivated frankincense producing Boswellia sacra tree.

Authors:  Abdul Latif Khan; Sajjad Asaf; Ahmed Al-Rawahi; In-Jung Lee; Ahmed Al-Harrasi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biochar Application Alleviated Negative Plant-Soil Feedback by Modifying Soil Microbiome.

Authors:  Wenpeng Wang; Zhuhua Wang; Kuan Yang; Pei Wang; Huiling Wang; Liwei Guo; Shusheng Zhu; Youyong Zhu; Xiahong He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.