| Literature DB >> 30294561 |
N Venkateswarulu1, S Shameer2, P V Bramhachari3, S K Thaslim Basha4, C Nagaraju4, T Vijaya1.
Abstract
The rationale of the present study was to isolate and identify endophytic fungi from endemic medicinal plants in Eastern Ghats and screened for antimicrobial potential of isolated fungal crude extracts. A total of 329 endophytic strains were isolated from 600 infected leaves and stem cuttings of endemic plants. The diversity and species richness was analyzed statistically and found to be higher in leaf segments than in stem segments. From isolated fungal strains, Cladosporium delicatulum was identified using molecular identification methods and selected as the most potent plumbagin-producing endophytic strain. Further the isolation and structural characterization of endophytic fungal plumbagin (5-hydroxyl-2-methylnaptalene-1,4-dione) was purified and confirmed through spectroscopy analysis. The molecular weight was determined as m/z 188 in positive mode by ESI-MS, which confirmed to be plumbagin which potentially inhibited all tested pathogens, therefore the endophytic fungal plumbagin from the current study possesses important biological activities against pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Biological activities; Cladosporium delicatulum; Endophytic fungi; Plumbagin; Structural characterization
Year: 2018 PMID: 30294561 PMCID: PMC6171049 DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) ISSN: 2215-017X
Statistical analysis of endophytic fungal occurrence in selected endemic plants.
| Samples | Abundance | Species richness | Shannon- Weiner diversity (H) | Simpson diversity | Species evenness | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | 68 | 27 | 3.148253 | 0.966198 | 0.95522113 | |
| stem | 57 | 26 | 3.141486 | 0.969298 | 0.964209 | |
| Leaf | 51 | 22 | 2.999078 | 0.963137 | 0.97024808 | |
| stem | 50 | 24 | 2.997427 | 0.962449 | 0.94316433 | |
| Leaf | 59 | 25 | 3.079009 | 0.964933 | 0.95654793 | |
| stem | 44 | 18 | 2.885941 | 0.960888 | 0.99846706 | |
Fig. 1(a): Abundance and species richness of endophytic fungi, (b): Simpson diversity and species evenness of endophytic fungi, (c): Shannon- Weiner diversity index (H) of endophytic fungi, (d): Isolation of endophytic fungi in different nutrient medias.
Isolation and colonization frequency of endophytic fungi from selected plants.
| Isolates | Name Endophytic fungi | No. of isolates | CF% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf | stem | Leaf | stem | Leaf | Stem | ||||
| EF1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | – | 3 | – | 10 | 1.66 | |
| EF2 | 2 | – | – | 1 | 2 | – | 5 | 0.83 | |
| EF3 | 3 | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1.16 | |
| EF4 | – | 2 | 2 | – | 1 | 3 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| EF5 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | 0.66 | |
| EF6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | – | 9 | 1.50 | |
| EF7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | 9 | 1.50 | |
| EF8 | – | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1.66 | |
| EF9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | – | 9 | 1.50 | |
| EF10 | – | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0.833 | |
| EF11 | 3 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 0.833 | |
| EF12 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.50 | |
| EF13 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | – | – | 10 | 1.66 | |
| EF14 | 2 | – | – | 2 | – | 3 | 7 | 1.16 | |
| EF15 | 1 | – | – | – | 5 | 2 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| EF16 | – | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | 3 | 0.50 | |
| EF17 | – | 3 | 2 | – | 1 | – | 6 | 1.00 | |
| EF18 | 1 | – | 5 | – | 2 | 4 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| EF19 | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 0.50 | |
| EF20 | – | – | 2 | 2 | – | – | 4 | 0.66 | |
| EF21 | 2 | – | 1 | 2 | 3 | – | 8 | 1.33 | |
| EF22 | – | 2 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 5 | 0.83 | |
| EF23 | 2 | 5 | – | 2 | – | – | 9 | 1.50 | |
| EF24 | 1 | 4 | – | 1 | – | – | 6 | 1.00 | |
| EF25 | 1 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 0.50 | |
| EF26 | – | – | 2 | 4 | – | – | 6 | 1.00 | |
| EF27 | – | 3 | – | – | 1 | – | 4 | 0.66 | |
| EF28 | 1 | – | 4 | 2 | 1 | – | 8 | 1.33 | |
| EF29 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| EF30 | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 0.50 | |
| EF31 | 5 | 3 | – | – | 2 | 1 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| EF32 | 4 | 1 | – | 2 | – | 3 | 10 | 1.66 | |
| EF33 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 2.83 | |
| EF34 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 2.83 | |
| EF35 | – | – | 4 | 5 | – | – | 9 | 1.50 | |
| EF36 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 3.16 | |
| EF37 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 3.50 | |
| EF38 | – | 1 | – | – | 3 | 4 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| EF39 | 1 | – | – | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1.16 | |
| EF40 | – | – | – | – | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1.00 | |
| Total isolates | 68 | 57 | 51 | 50 | 59 | 44 | 329 | ||
CF% colonization frequency.
List of 18 s rDNA based identified fungal endophytes with accession numbers.
| S.No | Isolates | Host plant | Name Endophytic fungi | Accession No. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | EF28 | KF493857 | ||
| 2. | EF29 | ״ | KF493859 | |
| 3. | EF30 | KJ638719 | ||
| 4. | EF31 | ״ | KJ638720 | |
| 5. | EF32 | ״ | KF493867 | |
| 6. | EF33 | ״ | KF493866 | |
| 7. | EF34 | KF493861 | ||
| 8. | EF35 | ״ | KF493862 | |
| 9. | EF36 | KF493856 | ||
| 10. | EF37 | KF493865 | ||
| 11. | EF38 | KF493855 | ||
| 12. | EF39 | ״ | KF493854 | |
| 13. | EF40 | KF493858 |
Fig. 2Phylogenetic analysis of the sequences of endophytic fungi (highlight) associated with endemic plants compared with reference sequences of the closest species following BLAST analysis, deposited in the GenBank database. The trees were constructed on the basis of the ITS region sequences using the maximum composite likelihood method.
List of chemical components detected in GC–MS analysis.
| Name of compounds | Formula | Retention time | M.W | Peak area% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ketone | C17H34O2 | 17.384 | 270 | 19.52 |
| 13,16-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ketone | C19H34O2 | 18.935 | 294 | 22.72 |
| Heptacosanoic acid, methyl ketone | C28H56O2 | 19.170 | 424 | 10.35 |
| Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | C24H38O4 | 22.516 | 390 | 42.16 |
| 3-butoxy-1,1,1,5,5,5-hexamethyl-3-(trimethylsiloxy) trisiloxane | C13H36O4Si4 | 30.725 | 368 | 5.23 |
Fig. 4GC–MS Cromatogram of Cladosporium delicatulum.
Fig. 3Culturaland spore morphology of cladosporium delicatulum.
Fig. 5Structural characterization of bioactive compound.
Antimicrobial activity of purified compound.
| Pathogenic fungi/compound | Zone of inhibition (mm) | MIC of compound(mg/mL) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound (50 mg) | 12.5 ± 0.18 | 13.8 ± 0.15 | 11.5 ± 0.15 | 12.4 ± 0.14 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 6.25 | 6.25 |
| Compound (100 mg) | 14.5 ± 0.22 | 16.6 ± 0.14 | 14.8 ± 0.20 | 15.6 ± 0.22 | – | – | – | – |
| Amphotericin- B | – | – | 18.0 | 18.0 | – | – | – | – |
| Propiconazole | 17.5 | 17.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Fig. 6Anti-fungal activity Cladosporium delicatulum isolated bioactive compound 5- hydroxyl- 2- methylnaptalene-1,4-dione.