Literature DB >> 11863159

Discrimination of sound source velocity in human listeners.

Simon Carlile1, Virginia Best.   

Abstract

The ability of six human subjects to discriminate the velocity of moving sound sources was examined using broadband stimuli presented in virtual auditory space. Subjects were presented with two successive stimuli moving in the frontal horizontal plane level with the ears, and were required to judge which moved the fastest. Discrimination thresholds were calculated for reference velocities of 15, 30, and 60 degrees/s under three stimulus conditions. In one condition, stimuli were centered on 0 degrees azimuth and their duration varied randomly to prevent subjects from using displacement as an indicator of velocity. Performance varied between subjects giving median thresholds of 5.5, 9.1, and 14.8 degrees/s for the three reference velocities, respectively. In a second condition, pairs of stimuli were presented for a constant duration and subjects would have been able to use displacement to assist their judgment as faster stimuli traveled further. It was found that thresholds decreased significantly for all velocities (3.8, 7.1, and 9.8 degrees/s), suggesting that the subjects were using the additional displacement cue. The third condition differed from the second in that the stimuli were "anchored" on the same starting location rather than centered on the midline, thus doubling the spatial offset between stimulus endpoints. Subjects showed the lowest thresholds in this condition (2.9, 4.0, and 7.0 degrees/s). The results suggested that the auditory system is sensitive to velocity per se, but velocity comparisons are greatly aided if displacement cues are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11863159     DOI: 10.1121/1.1436067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Human sensitivity to differences in the rate of auditory cue change.

Authors:  Erin S Maloff; D Wesley Grantham; Daniel H Ashmead
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory motion tracking ability of adults with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Keng Moua; Alan Kan; Heath G Jones; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation frequency as a cue for auditory speed perception.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Cesare V Parise; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.

Authors:  Adrian Y Cho; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Best Distance Perception in Virtual Audiovisual Environment.

Authors:  Hui Song; Ke Ma
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Hearing in slow-motion: Humans underestimate the speed of moving sounds.

Authors:  Irene Senna; Cesare V Parise; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of virtual speaker density and room reverberation on spatiotemporal thresholds of audio-visual motion coherence.

Authors:  Narayan Sankaran; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Auditory spatial processing in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Hannah L Golden; Jennifer M Nicholas; Keir X X Yong; Laura E Downey; Jonathan M Schott; Catherine J Mummery; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Discrimination contours for moving sounds reveal duration and distance cues dominate auditory speed perception.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Johahn Leung; Ella Wufong; Emily Orchard-Mills; Simon Carlile; David Alais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Perception of Auditory Motion.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; Johahn Leung
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.