Literature DB >> 8569468

Misdiagnosis at a university hospital in 4 medical eras.

W Kirch1, C Schafii.   

Abstract

In the present study 100 randomly selected autopsies from each of the years 1959, 1969, 1979, and 1989 at a German university hospital were analyzed to determine whether advances in diagnostic procedures have reduced the misdiagnosis rate. We define misdiagnosis as occurring when a disease that does not exist is assumed to be present and when the failure to recognize the true existing disease leads to a worsened patient prognosis. In all years analyzed, about 10% of the autopsies revealed a misdiagnosis; another 25% disclosed a false negative diagnosis; which did not influence the patient's prognosis; and about 10% disclosed a false-positive diagnosis, which again did not influence the patients prognosis. The most common diagnostic errors were pulmonary emboli, myocardial infarctions, neoplasms, and infections. The introduction of new diagnostic procedures such as ultrasound, computerized tomography, and radionuclide scans has not reduced the rate of misdiagnoses. Misinterpretation, technical errors, and overreliance on these new procedures occasionally contributed directly to diagnostic errors. By contrast, the patient's medical history and physical examination played an important role in the diagnostic process, leading to a correct final diagnosis in 60%-70% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8569468     DOI: 10.1097/00005792-199601000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  29 in total

1.  Death of the teaching autopsy.

Authors:  Gregory O'Grady
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

2.  Necropsy request practices in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; C T Escoffery; S E Shirley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Beyond patient safety Flatland.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates.

Authors:  K G Shojania; E C Burton; K M McDonald; L Goldman
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-12

5.  Prospective study of the value of necropsy examination in early death after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A H Lee; B T Borek; P J Gallagher; R Saunders; R K Lamb; S A Livesey; V T Tsang; J L Monro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Understanding Decision Making in Critical Care.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Lighthall; Cristina Vazquez-Guillamet
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-09-20

7.  Prime time to resuscitate clinical medicine and kill diagnostic greed?

Authors:  C Rajasoorya
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.858

8.  Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?

Authors:  George Dimopoulos; Michael Piagnerelli; Jacques Berré; Isabelle Salmon; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in Jamaica: a study from the University Hospital of the West Indies.

Authors:  T N Gibson; S E Shirley; C T Escoffery; M Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The 'Lost' frontier of clinical medicine: Have we reached a point of no return?

Authors:  Bharat Dalvi
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.