Literature DB >> 28697118

Finding Middle Ground in Constructing a Clinically Useful Expanded Carrier Screening Panel.

Blair Stevens1, Nevena Krstic, Malorie Jones, Lauren Murphy, Jennifer Hoskovec.   

Abstract

Expanded carrier screening for autosomal-recessive conditions effectively identifies more carrier couples than traditional guideline-based carrier screening. However, clinically available expanded carrier screening panels include numerous conditions, some of which have questionable clinical utility as a result of very low carrier frequency, low or unknown testing sensitivity, and mild or incompletely penetrant phenotypes. Using the 2013 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics Position Statement on Prenatal and Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening and the 2017 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee Opinion on Carrier Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine as guidance, we propose specific criteria for the development of expanded carrier screening panels that will maximize clinical utility and minimize patient stress, unnecessary cost of follow-up testing, and clinician time spent facilitating and performing follow-up counseling and testing. We identified 96 conditions that meet our proposed criteria, far more than current guidelines recommend. On the other hand, a considerable percentage (73%) of conditions on current expanded carrier screen panels does not meet our proposed criteria. The purpose of this commentary is to acknowledge the benefits of expanded panels, but to also recognize that in their current state, we are putting patients at risk for undue stress and spending excessive time and money on follow-up testing for remarkably rare or mild conditions and conditions with low screening performance. We encourage laboratories and clinicians to work together to create the most clinically useful screening panels for patients desiring reproductive risk information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28697118     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  Where is genetic medicine headed? Exploring the perspectives of Canadian genetic professionals on future trends using the Delphi method.

Authors:  Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Nick Dragojlovic; Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian; Jan M Friedman; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Equitable Expanded Carrier Screening Needs Indigenous Clinical and Population Genomic Data.

Authors:  Simon Easteal; Ruth M Arkell; Renzo F Balboa; Shayne A Bellingham; Alex D Brown; Tom Calma; Matthew C Cook; Megan Davis; Hugh J S Dawkins; Marcel E Dinger; Michael S Dobbie; Ashley Farlow; Kylie G Gwynne; Azure Hermes; Wendy E Hoy; Misty R Jenkins; Simon H Jiang; Warren Kaplan; Stephen Leslie; Bastien Llamas; Graham J Mann; Brendan J McMorran; Rebekah E McWhirter; Cliff J Meldrum; Shivashankar H Nagaraj; Saul J Newman; Jack S Nunn; Lyndon Ormond-Parker; Neil J Orr; Devashi Paliwal; Hardip R Patel; Glenn Pearson; Greg R Pratt; Boe Rambaldini; Lynette W Russell; Ravi Savarirayan; Matthew Silcocks; John C Skinner; Yassine Souilmi; Carola G Vinuesa; Gareth Baynam
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Obstetric management, tests, and technologies that impact childhood development.

Authors:  Christopher M Novak; Ernest M Graham
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 5.449

4.  Should Clinicians Leave "Expanded" Carrier Screening Decisions to Patients?

Authors:  Amanda Fakih; Kayte Spector-Bagdady
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2019-10-01

Review 5.  Expanded carrier screening: counseling and considerations.

Authors:  Teresa N Sparks
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Current attitudes and preconceptions towards expanded carrier screening in the Eastern Chinese reproductive-aged population.

Authors:  Fang Zhang; Jianxin Tan; Binbin Shao; Tao Jiang; Ran Zhou; Yan Wang; Jingjing Zhang; Fengchang Qiao; Xiuqing Ji; Ya Wang; Ping Hu; Zhengfeng Xu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  The use of expanded carrier screening of gamete donors.

Authors:  Molly R Payne; Anne-Bine Skytte; Joyce C Harper
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.353

8.  Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach.

Authors:  Maggie Westemeyer; Jennifer Saucier; Jody Wallace; Sarah A Prins; Aparna Shetty; Meenakshi Malhotra; Zachary P Demko; Christine M Eng; Louis Weckstein; Robert Boostanfar; Matthew Rabinowitz; Peter Benn; Dianne Keen-Kim; Paul Billings
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Time Costs for Genetic Counseling in Preconception Carrier Screening with Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Frances L Lynch; Patricia Himes; Marian J Gilmore; Elissa M Morris; Jennifer L Schneider; Tia L Kauffman; Elizabeth Shuster; Jacob A Reiss; John F Dickerson; Michael C Leo; James V Davis; Carmit K McMullen; Benjamin S Wilfond; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A data-driven evaluation of the size and content of expanded carrier screening panels.

Authors:  Rotem Ben-Shachar; Ashley Svenson; James D Goldberg; Dale Muzzey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.