Literature DB >> 28695541

Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments.

Kevin J P Woods1,2, Max H Siegel3, James Traer3, Josh H McDermott3,4.   

Abstract

Psychophysical experiments conducted remotely over the internet permit data collection from large numbers of participants but sacrifice control over sound presentation and therefore are not widely employed in hearing research. To help standardize online sound presentation, we introduce a brief psychophysical test for determining whether online experiment participants are wearing headphones. Listeners judge which of three pure tones is quietest, with one of the tones presented 180° out of phase across the stereo channels. This task is intended to be easy over headphones but difficult over loudspeakers due to phase-cancellation. We validated the test in the lab by testing listeners known to be wearing headphones or listening over loudspeakers. The screening test was effective and efficient, discriminating between the two modes of listening with a small number of trials. When run online, a bimodal distribution of scores was obtained, suggesting that some participants performed the task over loudspeakers despite instructions to use headphones. The ability to detect and screen out these participants mitigates concerns over sound quality for online experiments, a first step toward opening auditory perceptual research to the possibilities afforded by crowdsourcing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audition; Psychometrics/testing; Stimulus control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28695541      PMCID: PMC5693749          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1361-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  20 in total

1.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Eyal Peer; Joachim Vosgerau; Alessandro Acquisti
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-12

3.  Nonnaïveté among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers.

Authors:  Jesse Chandler; Pam Mueller; Gabriele Paolacci
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-03

4.  Individual differences reveal the basis of consonance.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span.

Authors:  Joshua K Hartshorne; Laura T Germine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03-13

6.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

7.  Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Peter J Bex; Russell L Woods
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; John V McDonnell; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Large-Scale Analysis of Auditory Segregation Behavior Crowdsourced via a Smartphone App.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Sukhbinder Kumar; Timothy D Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Crowdsourced single-trial probes of visual working memory for irrelevant features.

Authors:  Hongsup Shin; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  49 in total

1.  Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Schema learning for the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Kevin J P Woods; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cross-frequency coupling explains the preference for simple ratios in rhythmic behaviour and the relative stability across non-synchronous patterns.

Authors:  Dobromir Dotov; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Form and Function in Human Song.

Authors:  Samuel A Mehr; Manvir Singh; Hunter York; Luke Glowacki; Max M Krasnow
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.

Authors:  Nikole Giovannone; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Trait evaluations of faces and voices: Comparing within- and between-person variability.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Mila Mileva; A Mike Burton; Andrew W Young; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-03-18

7.  Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; James S Magnuson; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Explaining face-voice matching decisions: The contribution of mouth movements, stimulus effects and response biases.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Harriet Smith; Li Jiang; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Face masks and speaking style affect audio-visual word recognition and memory of native and non-native speech.

Authors:  Rajka Smiljanic; Sandie Keerstock; Kirsten Meemann; Sarah M Ransom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.