Literature DB >> 24356996

Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Eyal Peer1, Joachim Vosgerau, Alessandro Acquisti.   

Abstract

Data quality is one of the major concerns of using crowdsourcing websites such as Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to recruit participants for online behavioral studies. We compared two methods for ensuring data quality on MTurk: attention check questions (ACQs) and restricting participation to MTurk workers with high reputation (above 95% approval ratings). In Experiment 1, we found that high-reputation workers rarely failed ACQs and provided higher-quality data than did low-reputation workers; ACQs improved data quality only for low-reputation workers, and only in some cases. Experiment 2 corroborated these findings and also showed that more productive high-reputation workers produce the highest-quality data. We concluded that sampling high-reputation workers can ensure high-quality data without having to resort to using ACQs, which may lead to selection bias if participants who fail ACQs are excluded post-hoc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24356996     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  130 in total

1.  Differential item functioning analysis of the Vanderbilt Expertise Test for cars.

Authors:  Woo-Yeol Lee; Sun-Joo Cho; Rankin W McGugin; Ana Beth Van Gulick; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Estimating utility values for vesicoureteral reflux in the general public using an online tool.

Authors:  Jessica C Lloyd; Talitha Yen; Ricardo Pietrobon; John S Wiener; Sherry S Ross; Paul J Kokorowski; Caleb P Nelson; Jonathan C Routh
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Examining aging sexual stigma attitudes among adults by gender, age, and generational status.

Authors:  Maggie L Syme; Tracy J Cohn
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.658

4.  Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.

Authors:  Justin T Pickett; Sean Patrick Roche
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Survey Satisficing Inflates Reliability and Validity Measures: An Experimental Comparison of College and Amazon Mechanical Turk Samples.

Authors:  Tyler Hamby; Wyn Taylor
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Framing Indoor Tanning Warning Messages to Reduce Skin Cancer Risks Among Young Women: Implications for Research and Policy.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  A Comparison of Three Online Recruitment Strategies for Engaging Parents.

Authors:  Jodi Dworkin; Heather Hessel; Kate Gliske; Jessie H Rudi
Journal:  Fam Relat       Date:  2016-08-26

8.  Improving juror sensitivity to specific eyewitness factors: judicial instructions fail the test.

Authors:  Angela M Jones; Amanda N Bergold; Steven Penrod
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-02-13

9.  Headphone screening to facilitate web-based auditory experiments.

Authors:  Kevin J P Woods; Max H Siegel; James Traer; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Of pathogens and party lines: Social conservatism positively associates with COVID-19 precautions among U.S. Democrats but not Republicans.

Authors:  Theodore Samore; Daniel M T Fessler; Adam Maxwell Sparks; Colin Holbrook
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.