Literature DB >> 24284898

Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Ritwik K Niyogi1, Yannick-Andre Breton, Rebecca B Solomon, Kent Conover, Peter Shizgal, Peter Dayan.   

Abstract

Dividing limited time between work and leisure when both have their attractions is a common everyday decision. We provide a normative control-theoretic treatment of this decision that bridges economic and psychological accounts. We show how our framework applies to free-operant behavioural experiments in which subjects are required to work (depressing a lever) for sufficient total time (called the price) to receive a reward. When the microscopic benefit-of-leisure increases nonlinearly with duration, the model generates behaviour that qualitatively matches various microfeatures of subjects' choices, including the distribution of leisure bout durations as a function of the pay-off. We relate our model to traditional accounts by deriving macroscopic, molar, quantities from microscopic choices.

Keywords:  economics; leisure; microscopic; normative; reinforcement learning; work

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24284898      PMCID: PMC3869171          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  51 in total

1.  Falsification of matching theory's account of single-alternative responding: Herrnstein's k varies with sucrose concentration.

Authors:  J Dallery; J J McDowell; J S Lancaster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Molar versus as a paradigm clash.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  End effects of rated life quality: the James Dean Effect.

Authors:  E Diener; D Wirtz; S Oishi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

4.  Fundamental dimensional properties of the operant.

Authors:  T F GILBERT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-09       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Economic substitutability of electrical brain stimulation, food, and water.

Authors:  L Green; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A molar theory of reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Selection by consequences.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Serotonin and dopamine: unifying affective, activational, and decision functions.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Kae Nakamura; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Rattus Psychologicus: construction of preferences by self-stimulating rats.

Authors:  Yannick-André Breton; James C Marcus; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Dynamic behavioural changes in the Spontaneously Hyperactive Rat: 2. Control by novelty.

Authors:  Jonathan Williams; Geir Sagvolden; Eric Taylor; Terje Sagvolden
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  9 in total

1.  Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.

Authors:  Sara M Constantino; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Rats delay gratification during a time-based diminishing returns task.

Authors:  Douglas R Schuweiler; Manaahil Rao; Heather J Pribut; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.088

3.  Some work and some play: microscopic and macroscopic approaches to labor and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Tamping Ramping: Algorithmic, Implementational, and Computational Explanations of Phasic Dopamine Signals in the Accumbens.

Authors:  Kevin Lloyd; Peter Dayan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.

Authors:  Rebecca Brana Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Quantitative approaches to energy and glucose homeostasis: machine learning and modelling for precision understanding and prediction.

Authors:  Thomas McGrath; Kevin G Murphy; Nick S Jones
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Learning to use past evidence in a sophisticated world model.

Authors:  Sanjeevan Ahilan; Rebecca B Solomon; Yannick-André Breton; Kent Conover; Ritwik K Niyogi; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  The Convergence Model of Brain Reward Circuitry: Implications for Relief of Treatment-Resistant Depression by Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Medial Forebrain Bundle.

Authors:  Vasilios Pallikaras; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.617

9.  Mesolimbic dopamine signals the value of work.

Authors:  Arif A Hamid; Jeffrey R Pettibone; Omar S Mabrouk; Vaughn L Hetrick; Robert Schmidt; Caitlin M Vander Weele; Robert T Kennedy; Brandon J Aragona; Joshua D Berke
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 24.884

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.