Matthew R McGrail1,2, Peter M Wingrove3, Stephen M Petterson3, Andrew W Bazemore3. 1. Monash University, School of Rural Health, Churchill, Victoria, Australia matthew.mcgrail@monash.edu. 2. Centre of Research Excellence in Rural and Remote Primary Health Care, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia. 3. Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite considerable investment in increasing the number of primary care physicians in rural shortage areas, little is known about their movement rates and factors influencing their mobility. We aimed to characterize geographic mobility among rural primary care physicians, and to identify location and individual factors that influence such mobility. METHODS: Using data from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile for each clinically active US physician, we created seven 2-year (biennial) mobility periods during 2000-2014. These periods were merged with county-level "rurality," physician supply, economic characteristics, key demographic measures, and individual physician characteristics. We computed (1) mobility rates of physicians by rurality; (2) linear regression models of county-level rural nonretention (departure); and (3) logit models of physicians leaving rural practice. RESULTS: Biennial turnover was about 17% among physicians aged 45 and younger, compared with 9% among physicians aged 46 to 65, with little difference between rural and metropolitan groups. County-level physician mobility was higher for counties that lacked a hospital (absolute increase = 5.7%), had a smaller population size, and had lower primary care physician supply, but area-level economic and demographic factors had little impact. Female physicians (odds ratios = 1.24 and 1.46 for those aged 45 or younger and those aged 46 to 65, respectively) and physicians born in a metropolitan area (odds ratios = 1.75 and 1.56 for those aged 45 or younger and those aged 46 to 65, respectively) were more likely to leave rural practice. CONCLUSIONS: These flndings provide national-level evidence of rural physician mobility rates and factors associated with both county-level retention and individual-level departures. Outcomes were notably poorer in the most remote locations and those already having poorer physician supply and professional support. Rural health workforce planners and policymakers must be cognizant of these key factors to more effectively target retention policies and to take into account the additional support needed by these more vulnerable communities.
PURPOSE: Despite considerable investment in increasing the number of primary care physicians in rural shortage areas, little is known about their movement rates and factors influencing their mobility. We aimed to characterize geographic mobility among rural primary care physicians, and to identify location and individual factors that influence such mobility. METHODS: Using data from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile for each clinically active US physician, we created seven 2-year (biennial) mobility periods during 2000-2014. These periods were merged with county-level "rurality," physician supply, economic characteristics, key demographic measures, and individual physician characteristics. We computed (1) mobility rates of physicians by rurality; (2) linear regression models of county-level rural nonretention (departure); and (3) logit models of physicians leaving rural practice. RESULTS: Biennial turnover was about 17% among physicians aged 45 and younger, compared with 9% among physicians aged 46 to 65, with little difference between rural and metropolitan groups. County-level physician mobility was higher for counties that lacked a hospital (absolute increase = 5.7%), had a smaller population size, and had lower primary care physician supply, but area-level economic and demographic factors had little impact. Female physicians (odds ratios = 1.24 and 1.46 for those aged 45 or younger and those aged 46 to 65, respectively) and physicians born in a metropolitan area (odds ratios = 1.75 and 1.56 for those aged 45 or younger and those aged 46 to 65, respectively) were more likely to leave rural practice. CONCLUSIONS: These flndings provide national-level evidence of rural physician mobility rates and factors associated with both county-level retention and individual-level departures. Outcomes were notably poorer in the most remote locations and those already having poorer physician supply and professional support. Rural health workforce planners and policymakers must be cognizant of these key factors to more effectively target retention policies and to take into account the additional support needed by these more vulnerable communities.
Authors: Alain Vanasse; Thomas C Ricketts; Josiane Courteau; Maria Gabriela Orzanco; R Randolph; Shabnam Asghari Journal: Rural Remote Health Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Anthony Scott; Julia Witt; John Humphreys; Catherine Joyce; Guyonne Kalb; Sung-Hee Jeon; Matthew McGrail Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2013-07-13 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Peter Meyers; Elizabeth Wilkinson; Stephen Petterson; Davis G Patterson; Randall Longenecker; David Schmitz; Andrew Bazemore Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2020-12-04
Authors: Amy D Lu; Elise Gunzburger; Thomas J Glorioso; William B Smith; Rachael R Kenney; Mary A Whooley; P Michael Ho Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Matthew McGrail; Belinda O'Sullivan; Tiana Gurney; Diann Eley; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mario Cesar Scheffer; Alex Jones Flores Cassenote; Aline Gil Alves Guilloux; Mario Roberto Dal Poz Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2018-05-02