Peter Meyers1, Elizabeth Wilkinson2, Stephen Petterson3, Davis G Patterson4, Randall Longenecker5, David Schmitz6, Andrew Bazemore7. 1. Full-Time Physician, Minnesota Community Care (previously West Side Community Health Services). 2. Junior Analyst, Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care. 3. Research Director, Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care. 4. Research Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine. 5. Professor of Family Medicine and Assistant Dean, Rural and Underserved Programs, Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine. 6. Chair, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences. 7. Senior Vice President of Research and Policy, American Board of Family Medicine, and Co-Director, Center for Professionalism & Value in Healthcare.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rural regions of the United States continue to experience a disproportionate shortage of physicians compared to urban regions despite decades of state and federal investments in workforce initiatives. The graduate medical education system effectively controls the size of the physician workforce but lacks effective mechanisms to equitably distribute those physicians. OBJECTIVE: We created a measurement tool called a "rural workforce year" to better understand the rural primary care workforce. It quantifies the rural workforce contributions of rurally trained family medicine residency program graduates and compares them to contributions of a geographically matched cohort of non-rurally trained graduates. METHODS: We identified graduates in both cohorts and tracked their practice locations from 2008-2018. We compared the average number of rural workforce years in 3 cross sections: 5, 8, and 10 years in practice after residency graduation. RESULTS: Rurally trained graduates practicing for contributed a higher number of rural workforce years in total and on average per graduate compared to a matched cohort of non-rural/rural training tack (RTT) graduates in the same practice intervals (P < .001 in all 3 comparison groups). In order to replace the rural workforce years produced by 1 graduate from the rural/RTT cohort, it would take 2.89 graduates from non-rural/RTT programs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that rural/RTT-trained physicians devote substantially more service to rural communities than a matched cohort of non-rural/RTT graduates and highlight the importance of rural/RTT programs as a major contributor to the rural primary care workforce in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Rural regions of the United States continue to experience a disproportionate shortage of physicians compared to urban regions despite decades of state and federal investments in workforce initiatives. The graduate medical education system effectively controls the size of the physician workforce but lacks effective mechanisms to equitably distribute those physicians. OBJECTIVE: We created a measurement tool called a "rural workforce year" to better understand the rural primary care workforce. It quantifies the rural workforce contributions of rurally trained family medicine residency program graduates and compares them to contributions of a geographically matched cohort of non-rurally trained graduates. METHODS: We identified graduates in both cohorts and tracked their practice locations from 2008-2018. We compared the average number of rural workforce years in 3 cross sections: 5, 8, and 10 years in practice after residency graduation. RESULTS: Rurally trained graduates practicing for contributed a higher number of rural workforce years in total and on average per graduate compared to a matched cohort of non-rural/rural training tack (RTT) graduates in the same practice intervals (P < .001 in all 3 comparison groups). In order to replace the rural workforce years produced by 1 graduate from the rural/RTT cohort, it would take 2.89 graduates from non-rural/RTT programs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that rural/RTT-trained physicians devote substantially more service to rural communities than a matched cohort of non-rural/RTT graduates and highlight the importance of rural/RTT programs as a major contributor to the rural primary care workforce in the United States.
Authors: Therese Zink; Bruce Center; Deborah Finstad; James G Boulger; Lillian A Repesh; Ruth Westra; Raymond Christensen; Kathleen Dwyer Brooks Journal: Acad Med Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ernest Blake Fagan; Claire Gibbons; Sean C Finnegan; Stephen Petterson; Lars E Peterson; Robert L Phillips; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Fam Med Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Stephen M Petterson; Winston R Liaw; Robert L Phillips; David L Rabin; David S Meyers; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Douglas O Staiger; Samuel M Marshall; David C Goodman; David I Auerbach; Peter I Buerhaus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Amelia Goodfellow; Jesus G Ulloa; Patrick T Dowling; Efrain Talamantes; Somil Chheda; Curtis Bone; Gerardo Moreno Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Candice Chen; Stephen Petterson; Robert L Phillips; Fitzhugh Mullan; Andrew Bazemore; Sarah D O'Donnell Journal: Acad Med Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Emily M Hawes; Erin Fraher; Steven Crane; Amanda Weidner; Hope Wittenberg; Judith Pauwels; Randall Longenecker; Frederick Chen; Cristen P Page Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2021-08-13