PURPOSE: To analyze the previously unknown relationships between the specialty plans of entering medical students and their eventual rural practice outcomes. METHOD: For 5,419 graduates from the 1978-2002 classes of Jefferson Medical College, their self-reported specialty plans at the time of matriculation were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, as were their 2007 practice locations. Specialty plans were grouped into 12 categories, and the percentages of graduates initially planning each specialty group who were actually practicing in rural areas were determined. RESULTS: Entering medical students' specialty plans were strongly related to eventual rural practice (P < .001). Those students planning family medicine were "highly likely" to practice in rural areas (29.4%, 238/810). They were 1.5 times as likely to practice rural as a "mid-likely" group (those planning general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, general internal medicine, or one of the medical subspecialties: 19.6% [range 17.9%-21.0%], 229/1,167). Students planning family medicine were also 2.1 times as likely to practice rural as those students planning a "lower-likely" group (those planning general pediatrics, one of the surgical subspecialties, the hospital specialties of radiology, anesthesiology and pathology, and obstetrics-gynecology, or other specialties: 14.0% [range 13.0%-14.3%], 142/1,016). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that students' specialty plans at medical school matriculation are significantly related to rural outcomes, and they provide new information quantifying the absolute and relative likelihood of those planning various specialties to enter rural practice. This information is particularly important for medical schools that have or plan to develop comprehensive rural programs.
PURPOSE: To analyze the previously unknown relationships between the specialty plans of entering medical students and their eventual rural practice outcomes. METHOD: For 5,419 graduates from the 1978-2002 classes of Jefferson Medical College, their self-reported specialty plans at the time of matriculation were obtained from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study, as were their 2007 practice locations. Specialty plans were grouped into 12 categories, and the percentages of graduates initially planning each specialty group who were actually practicing in rural areas were determined. RESULTS: Entering medical students' specialty plans were strongly related to eventual rural practice (P < .001). Those students planning family medicine were "highly likely" to practice in rural areas (29.4%, 238/810). They were 1.5 times as likely to practice rural as a "mid-likely" group (those planning general surgery, psychiatry, emergency medicine, general internal medicine, or one of the medical subspecialties: 19.6% [range 17.9%-21.0%], 229/1,167). Students planning family medicine were also 2.1 times as likely to practice rural as those students planning a "lower-likely" group (those planning general pediatrics, one of the surgical subspecialties, the hospital specialties of radiology, anesthesiology and pathology, and obstetrics-gynecology, or other specialties: 14.0% [range 13.0%-14.3%], 142/1,016). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that students' specialty plans at medical school matriculation are significantly related to rural outcomes, and they provide new information quantifying the absolute and relative likelihood of those planning various specialties to enter rural practice. This information is particularly important for medical schools that have or plan to develop comprehensive rural programs.
Authors: David M Silvestri; Meridith Blevins; Kenneth A Wallston; Arfan R Afzal; Nazmul Alam; Ben Andrews; Miliard Derbew; Simran Kaur; Mwapatsa Mipando; Charles A Mkony; Philip M Mwachaka; Nirju Ranjit; Sten H Vermund Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Amelia Goodfellow; Jesus G Ulloa; Patrick T Dowling; Efrain Talamantes; Somil Chheda; Curtis Bone; Gerardo Moreno Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 6.893