Matthew P Pase1,2,3,4, Alexa S Beiser1,2,5, Jayandra J Himali1,2,5, Claudia L Satizabal1,2,6, Hugo J Aparicio1,2, Charles DeCarli2,7, Geneviève Chêne8, Carole Dufouil8, Sudha Seshadri1,2,6. 1. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts. 3. Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia. 4. Melbourne Dementia Research Centre, The Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer's and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas. 7. Department of Neurology, School of Medicine & Imaging of Dementia and Aging Laboratory, Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California. 8. Inserm Unit 1219 Bordeaux Population Health, CIC 1401-EC (Clinical Epidemiology), University of Bordeaux, ISPED (Bordeaux School of Public Health), Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Abstract
Importance: Blood-based biomarkers have the potential to improve the identification of persons with the greatest dementia risk for inclusion in dementia prevention trials through low-cost and minimally invasive screening. Objective: To investigate the use of plasma total tau as a blood biomarker for dementia and related endophenotypes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study used data from the US community-based Framingham Heart Study with replication in the Memento study, a multicenter cohort of persons with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive complaints recruited from memory clinics across France. Total tau levels were measured from stored plasma samples in Framingham Heart Study participants during 2004 to 2011. Dementia follow-up occurred across a median of 6 years (interquartile range, 5-8 years) for persons 65 years and older who were dementia free at baseline. Plasma and/or cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from Memento study participants from April 19, 2011, to June 22, 2016. Dementia follow-up took place over a median of 4 years (interquartile range, 3-5 years). Data analysis was performed from January to November 2018. Exposures: Plasma total tau level measured using single-molecule array technology. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of dementia of any cause (all dementia) and dementia due to clinical Alzheimer disease (AD dementia). Results: Among the 1453 participants in the Framingham dementia study sample, the mean (SD) age was 75 (7) years; 792 (54.5%) were female. Among the 367 individuals in the replication cohort, the mean (SD) age was 69 (9) years; 217 (59.1%) were female. Of 134 cases of incident all dementia in the Framingham sample, 105 were AD dementia. After adjustment for age and sex, each SD unit increase in the log of plasma total tau level was associated with a 35% increase in AD dementia risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.67). The addition of plasma total tau to a model including age and sex improved the stratification of participants for risk of AD dementia (net reclassification improvement, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.030-0.716). Higher plasma total tau level was associated with poorer cognition across 7 cognitive tasks (P < .05) and smaller hippocampi (hippocampal volume: β [SE] = 0.002 [0.001]; P = .003) as well as neurofibrillary tangles (β [SE] = 0.95 [0.45]; P = .04) and microinfarcts (odds ratio, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.26-7.37) at autopsy. In the replication cohort, plasma total tau level weakly correlated with cerebrospinal fluid total tau level (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.16; P = .07), but plasma total tau was at least as strongly associated with incident AD dementia as cerebrospinal fluid total tau (log plasma total tau: HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.00-5.48; log cerebrospinal fluid total tau: HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.33-3.44) after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that plasma total tau levels may improve the prediction of future dementia, are associated with dementia endophenotypes, and may be used as a biomarker for risk stratification in dementia prevention trials.
Importance: Blood-based biomarkers have the potential to improve the identification of persons with the greatest dementia risk for inclusion in dementia prevention trials through low-cost and minimally invasive screening. Objective: To investigate the use of plasma total tau as a blood biomarker for dementia and related endophenotypes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study used data from the US community-based Framingham Heart Study with replication in the Memento study, a multicenter cohort of persons with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive complaints recruited from memory clinics across France. Total tau levels were measured from stored plasma samples in Framingham Heart Study participants during 2004 to 2011. Dementia follow-up occurred across a median of 6 years (interquartile range, 5-8 years) for persons 65 years and older who were dementia free at baseline. Plasma and/or cerebrospinal fluid samples were obtained from Memento study participants from April 19, 2011, to June 22, 2016. Dementia follow-up took place over a median of 4 years (interquartile range, 3-5 years). Data analysis was performed from January to November 2018. Exposures: Plasma total tau level measured using single-molecule array technology. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incidence of dementia of any cause (all dementia) and dementia due to clinical Alzheimer disease (AD dementia). Results: Among the 1453 participants in the Framingham dementia study sample, the mean (SD) age was 75 (7) years; 792 (54.5%) were female. Among the 367 individuals in the replication cohort, the mean (SD) age was 69 (9) years; 217 (59.1%) were female. Of 134 cases of incident all dementia in the Framingham sample, 105 were AD dementia. After adjustment for age and sex, each SD unit increase in the log of plasma total tau level was associated with a 35% increase in AD dementia risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.67). The addition of plasma total tau to a model including age and sex improved the stratification of participants for risk of AD dementia (net reclassification improvement, 0.382; 95% CI, 0.030-0.716). Higher plasma total tau level was associated with poorer cognition across 7 cognitive tasks (P < .05) and smaller hippocampi (hippocampal volume: β [SE] = 0.002 [0.001]; P = .003) as well as neurofibrillary tangles (β [SE] = 0.95 [0.45]; P = .04) and microinfarcts (odds ratio, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.26-7.37) at autopsy. In the replication cohort, plasma total tau level weakly correlated with cerebrospinal fluid total tau level (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.16; P = .07), but plasma total tau was at least as strongly associated with incident AD dementia as cerebrospinal fluid total tau (log plasma total tau: HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.00-5.48; log cerebrospinal fluid total tau: HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.33-3.44) after adjustment for age and sex. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings suggest that plasma total tau levels may improve the prediction of future dementia, are associated with dementia endophenotypes, and may be used as a biomarker for risk stratification in dementia prevention trials.
Authors: Charles DeCarli; Joseph Massaro; Danielle Harvey; John Hald; Mats Tullberg; Rhoda Au; Alexa Beiser; Ralph D'Agostino; Philip A Wolf Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Bob Olsson; Ronald Lautner; Ulf Andreasson; Annika Öhrfelt; Erik Portelius; Maria Bjerke; Mikko Hölttä; Christoffer Rosén; Caroline Olsson; Gabrielle Strobel; Elizabeth Wu; Kelly Dakin; Max Petzold; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Jason Karlawish; Michael Donohue; David P Salmon; Paul Aisen Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Shorena Janelidze; Philip S Insel; Ulf Andreasson; Erik Stomrud; Sebastian Palmqvist; David Baker; Cristina A Tan Hehir; Andreas Jeromin; David Hanlon; Linan Song; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Michael W Weiner; Oskar Hansson; Kaj Blennow Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Anna E Mullins; Korey Kam; Ankit Parekh; Omonigho M Bubu; Ricardo S Osorio; Andrew W Varga Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Omonigho M Bubu; Andreia G Andrade; Ogie Q Umasabor-Bubu; Megan M Hogan; Arlener D Turner; Mony J de Leon; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Indu Ayappa; Girardin Jean-Louis G; Melinda L Jackson; Andrew W Varga; Ricardo S Osorio Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Matthew P Pase; Jayandra J Himali; Hugo J Aparicio; Jose Rafael Romero; Claudia L Satizabal; Pauline Maillard; Charles DeCarli; Alexa S Beiser; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Matthew P Pase; Jayandra J Himali; Alexa S Beiser; Charles DeCarli; Emer R McGrath; Claudia L Satizabal; Hugo J Aparicio; Hieab H H Adams; Alexander P Reiner; W T Longstreth; Myriam Fornage; Russell P Tracy; Oscar Lopez; Bruce M Psaty; Daniel Levy; Sudha Seshadri; Joshua C Bis Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael A Sugarman; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Yorghos Tripodis; Ann C McKee; Thor D Stein; Brett Martin; Joseph N Palmisano; Eric G Steinberg; Irene Simkin; Andrew E Budson; Ronald Killiany; Maureen K O'Connor; Rhoda Au; Wendy Wei Qiao Qiu; Lee E Goldstein; Neil W Kowall; Jesse Mez; Robert A Stern; Michael L Alosco Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: N J Ashton; A Leuzy; T K Karikari; N Mattsson-Carlgren; A Dodich; M Boccardi; J Corre; A Drzezga; A Nordberg; R Ossenkoppele; H Zetterberg; K Blennow; G B Frisoni; V Garibotto; O Hansson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Shorena Janelidze; Niklas Mattsson; Sebastian Palmqvist; Ruben Smith; Thomas G Beach; Geidy E Serrano; Xiyun Chai; Nicholas K Proctor; Udo Eichenlaub; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Eric M Reiman; Erik Stomrud; Jeffrey L Dage; Oskar Hansson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 53.440