Literature DB >> 28689193

Anticipation, teamwork and cognitive load: chasing efficiency during robot-assisted surgery.

Kevin Sexton1, Amanda Johnson1, Amanda Gotsch1, Ahmed A Hussein1,2, Lora Cavuoto3, Khurshid A Guru1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has changed the traditional operating room (OR), occupying more space with equipment and isolating console surgeons away from the patients and their team. We aimed to evaluate how anticipation of surgical steps and familiarity between team members impacted efficiency.
METHODS: We analysed recordings (video and audio) of 12 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Any requests between surgeon and the team members were documented and classified by personnel, equipment type, mode of communication, level of inconvenience in fulfilling the request and anticipation. Surgical team members completed questionnaires assessing team familiarity and cognitive load (National Aeronautics and Space Administration - Task Load Index). Predictors of team efficiency were assessed using Pearson correlation and stepwise linear regression.
RESULTS: 1330 requests were documented, of which 413 (31%) were anticipated. Anticipation correlated negatively with operative time, resulting in overall 8% reduction of OR time. Team familiarity negatively correlated with inconveniences. Anticipation ratio, per cent of requests that were non-verbal and total request duration were significantly correlated with the console surgeons' cognitive load (r=0.77, p=0.006; r=0.63, p=0.04; and r=0.70, p=0.02, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Anticipation and active engagement by the surgical team resulted in shorter operative time, and higher familiarity scores were associated with fewer inconveniences. Less anticipation and non-verbal requests were also associated with lower cognitive load for the console surgeon. Training efforts to increase anticipation and team familiarity can improve team efficiency during RAS. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audit and feedback; Communication; Human factors; Performance measures; Teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28689193      PMCID: PMC5952358          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  27 in total

1.  A method for measuring team skills.

Authors:  J Annett; D Cunningham; P Mathias-Jones
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Job satisfaction among nurses: a literature review.

Authors:  Hong Lu; Alison E While; K Louise Barriball
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 3.  Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature.

Authors:  S Yule; R Flin; S Paterson-Brown; N Maran
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Distracting communications in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Nick Sevdalis; Andrew N Healey; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 5.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  [Physical and mental strain on the surgeon during minimally invasive surgery].

Authors:  Helga Richert Munch-Petersen; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2008-02-18

7.  Technical mentorship during robot-assisted surgery: a cognitive analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed A Hussein; Somayeh B Shafiei; Mohamed Sharif; Ehsan Esfahani; Basel Ahmad; Justen D Kozlowski; Zishan Hashmi; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.

Authors:  Adrian Park; Gyusung Lee; F Jacob Seagull; Nora Meenaghan; David Dexter
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based practice.

Authors:  Bernard T Lee; Adam M Tobias; Janet H Yueh; Eran D Bar-Meir; Lynn M Darrah; Charlotte L Guglielmi; Elizabeth R Wood; Justine M Carr; Donald W Moorman
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Peri-operative morbidity associated with radical cystectomy in a multicenter database of community and academic hospitals.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; David Schramm; Kelsey Witiuk; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Work-system interventions in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review exploring the gap between challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Falisha Kanji; Ken Catchpole; Eunice Choi; Myrtede Alfred; Kate Cohen; Daniel Shouhed; Jennifer Anger; Tara Cohen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of Flow Disruptions on Mental Workload and Surgical Performance in Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Jeannette Weber; Ken Catchpole; Armin J Becker; Boris Schlenker; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  James M Kinross; Sam E Mason; George Mylonas; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Factors affecting workflow in robot-assisted surgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Jannie Lysgaard Poulsen; Birgitte Bruun; Doris Oestergaard; Lene Spanager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  RoCS: Robotic Curriculum for young Surgeons.

Authors:  Jessica Stockheim; Aristotelis Perrakis; Bernhard A Sabel; Robert Waschipky; Roland S Croner
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

6.  Determinants of hospital variability in perioperative red blood cell transfusions during coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  David C Fitzgerald; Annie N Simpson; Robert A Baker; Xiaoting Wu; Min Zhang; Michael P Thompson; Gaetano Paone; Alphonse Delucia; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Analysis of Dynamic Changes in Cognitive Workload During Cardiac Surgery Perfusionists' Interactions With the Cardiopulmonary Bypass Pump.

Authors:  Lauren R Kennedy-Metz; Roger D Dias; Rithy Srey; Geoffrey C Rance; Heather M Conboy; Miguel E Haime; Jacquelyn A Quin; Steven J Yule; Marco A Zenati
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Communication as a non-technical skill in the operating room: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Sisilie Havnås Skråmm; Inger Lise Smith Jacobsen; Ingrid Hanssen
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-02-25

9.  Systematic review of team performance in minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

Authors:  W J van der Vliet; S M Haenen; M Solis-Velasco; C H C Dejong; U P Neumann; A J Moser; R M van Dam
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-01-30

10.  Implementing structured team debriefing using a Black Box in the operating room: surveying team satisfaction.

Authors:  A S H M van Dalen; M Jansen; M van Haperen; S van Dieren; C J Buskens; E J M Nieveen van Dijkum; W A Bemelman; T P Grantcharov; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.